Power Changes Responsibility: Different Advice for the Socialist International and the Fourth Intern…
Introduction: The Left’s Crisis Is Not Ideological, but RelationalThe contemporary Left does not suffer from a lack of ideals. It suffers from a refusal to differentiate responsibility according to power. For more than a century, internal debates have treated left-wing organisations as if they occupied comparable positions in the world system. They do not. Some hold state power, legislative leverage, regulatory capacity, and international access. Others hold little more than critique, memory,...
Loaded Magazines and the Collapse of Political Legitimacy:A Risk-Ethical and Political-Economic Anal…
Political legitimacy does not collapse at the moment a weapon is fired. It collapses earlier—at the moment a governing authority accepts the presence of live ammunition in domestic crowd control as a legitimate option. The decision to deploy armed personnel carrying loaded magazines is not a neutral security measure. It is a risk-ethical commitment. By definition, live ammunition introduces a non-zero probability of accidental discharge, misjudgment, panic escalation, or chain reactions leadi...
Cognitive Constructivism: Narrative Sovereignty and the Architecture of Social Reality-CC0
An archival essay for independent readingIntroduction: From “What the World Is” to “How the World Is Told”Most analyses of power begin inside an already-given reality. They ask who controls resources, institutions, or bodies, and how domination operates within these parameters. Such approaches, while necessary, leave a deeper question largely untouched:How does a particular version of reality come to be accepted as reality in the first place?This essay proposes a shift in analytical focus—fro...
<100 subscribers
Power Changes Responsibility: Different Advice for the Socialist International and the Fourth Intern…
Introduction: The Left’s Crisis Is Not Ideological, but RelationalThe contemporary Left does not suffer from a lack of ideals. It suffers from a refusal to differentiate responsibility according to power. For more than a century, internal debates have treated left-wing organisations as if they occupied comparable positions in the world system. They do not. Some hold state power, legislative leverage, regulatory capacity, and international access. Others hold little more than critique, memory,...
Loaded Magazines and the Collapse of Political Legitimacy:A Risk-Ethical and Political-Economic Anal…
Political legitimacy does not collapse at the moment a weapon is fired. It collapses earlier—at the moment a governing authority accepts the presence of live ammunition in domestic crowd control as a legitimate option. The decision to deploy armed personnel carrying loaded magazines is not a neutral security measure. It is a risk-ethical commitment. By definition, live ammunition introduces a non-zero probability of accidental discharge, misjudgment, panic escalation, or chain reactions leadi...
Cognitive Constructivism: Narrative Sovereignty and the Architecture of Social Reality-CC0
An archival essay for independent readingIntroduction: From “What the World Is” to “How the World Is Told”Most analyses of power begin inside an already-given reality. They ask who controls resources, institutions, or bodies, and how domination operates within these parameters. Such approaches, while necessary, leave a deeper question largely untouched:How does a particular version of reality come to be accepted as reality in the first place?This essay proposes a shift in analytical focus—fro...
Once, there was a great city that lived under the shadow of a dragon.
The dragon coiled around the tallest tower, its smoke drifting through the streets. People walked with lowered heads, learning to live with fear as if it were a season that never changed.
One day, a young dragon-slayer rose from among them.
He did not lift his sword for himself. The people placed their hopes, their wounds, and their dreams upon his shoulders. They marched behind him — and together, they fought.
The dragon fell.
And in the city square, torches burned late into the night. People said:
“Never again shall we be ruled by a dragon.”
The slayer stood upon the tower not as a conqueror, but as a promise. His sword was planted at the city gate as a reminder of the oath:
You are here not to become the dragon —
but to ensure no dragon returns.
He nodded.
Time passed.
The city grew larger, more complicated. Roads had to be built. Grain stored. Disputes judged. Voices multiplied — loud, tangled, irreconcilable.
Order was needed. Stability was demanded.
The dragon-slayer began to tell himself:
“I am still protecting the city…
even when I must silence noise.”
Those who once walked beside him — the watchers, the questioners, the ones who reminded him of the oath — were slowly moved away from the walls.
They left with a quiet blessing:
“May you always remember why you raised the sword,
and not only why you hold the tower.”
But the wind was strong, and their words scattered.
In time, the city’s officials learned a language made of careful pauses.
New faces rose — cautious, obedient, guarded. The dragon-slayer watched from the tower and felt an unease he could not name.
“Is the city,” he wondered,
“beginning to resemble the dragon again?”
The reply he received was always the same:
“No, my lord.
This is to prevent the dragon’s return.”
One day, he realized the air at the top of the tower had grown cold.
The sounds of the streets no longer reached him. The people were distant; their voices filtered through walls of translation and loyalty.
So he gripped the hilt of the old sword once more.
“Perhaps I must slay the dragon again,”
he whispered.
“Only this time… the dragon lives inside the city.”
The city trembled.
The young were called forth again. Banners rose, chants returned — but this time, anger ran faster than wisdom. Some carried wounds disguised as justice; others wore ambition clothed in ideals. Old grievances walked the streets dressed as righteousness.
The oath dissolved into noise.
When the dust cleared, the city stood —
but those who now ruled it
were no longer the same ones who had set out.
Years later, the dragon-slayer finally understood:
The dragon had never been only a creature.
It was the shadow cast by power itself.
It lived in the loneliness of the tower,
in the structures that reshape those who climb them,
in every silence that grows where speech once stood.
He looked at the city lights below and asked:
“Did I come to slay the dragon…
or did I simply learn to rule as it once did?”
No answer came — only the quiet breath of the wind through empty halls.
And so, the city passed down a story:
In every generation, someone will lift a sword and declare,
“I am the new dragon-slayer.”
And the people — silently, cautiously — will ask:
“And when the battle is over…
will you become the dragon, too?”
Somewhere, in a hidden notebook, a different line is written:
“Perhaps the true task is not to find a better slayer —
but to build a city that no longer needs one.”
Once, there was a great city that lived under the shadow of a dragon.
The dragon coiled around the tallest tower, its smoke drifting through the streets. People walked with lowered heads, learning to live with fear as if it were a season that never changed.
One day, a young dragon-slayer rose from among them.
He did not lift his sword for himself. The people placed their hopes, their wounds, and their dreams upon his shoulders. They marched behind him — and together, they fought.
The dragon fell.
And in the city square, torches burned late into the night. People said:
“Never again shall we be ruled by a dragon.”
The slayer stood upon the tower not as a conqueror, but as a promise. His sword was planted at the city gate as a reminder of the oath:
You are here not to become the dragon —
but to ensure no dragon returns.
He nodded.
Time passed.
The city grew larger, more complicated. Roads had to be built. Grain stored. Disputes judged. Voices multiplied — loud, tangled, irreconcilable.
Order was needed. Stability was demanded.
The dragon-slayer began to tell himself:
“I am still protecting the city…
even when I must silence noise.”
Those who once walked beside him — the watchers, the questioners, the ones who reminded him of the oath — were slowly moved away from the walls.
They left with a quiet blessing:
“May you always remember why you raised the sword,
and not only why you hold the tower.”
But the wind was strong, and their words scattered.
In time, the city’s officials learned a language made of careful pauses.
New faces rose — cautious, obedient, guarded. The dragon-slayer watched from the tower and felt an unease he could not name.
“Is the city,” he wondered,
“beginning to resemble the dragon again?”
The reply he received was always the same:
“No, my lord.
This is to prevent the dragon’s return.”
One day, he realized the air at the top of the tower had grown cold.
The sounds of the streets no longer reached him. The people were distant; their voices filtered through walls of translation and loyalty.
So he gripped the hilt of the old sword once more.
“Perhaps I must slay the dragon again,”
he whispered.
“Only this time… the dragon lives inside the city.”
The city trembled.
The young were called forth again. Banners rose, chants returned — but this time, anger ran faster than wisdom. Some carried wounds disguised as justice; others wore ambition clothed in ideals. Old grievances walked the streets dressed as righteousness.
The oath dissolved into noise.
When the dust cleared, the city stood —
but those who now ruled it
were no longer the same ones who had set out.
Years later, the dragon-slayer finally understood:
The dragon had never been only a creature.
It was the shadow cast by power itself.
It lived in the loneliness of the tower,
in the structures that reshape those who climb them,
in every silence that grows where speech once stood.
He looked at the city lights below and asked:
“Did I come to slay the dragon…
or did I simply learn to rule as it once did?”
No answer came — only the quiet breath of the wind through empty halls.
And so, the city passed down a story:
In every generation, someone will lift a sword and declare,
“I am the new dragon-slayer.”
And the people — silently, cautiously — will ask:
“And when the battle is over…
will you become the dragon, too?”
Somewhere, in a hidden notebook, a different line is written:
“Perhaps the true task is not to find a better slayer —
but to build a city that no longer needs one.”
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet