INDUSTRIAL CURRENCY IS A TOOL FOR A FAIR REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH AND

BRIDGE FOR THE FLOW OF CAPITAL TO THE COMMUNITY OF CREATORS

Processes of globalization of the world economy and the evolution of human civilization "flatten" the differences between the economies of different countries by integrating them into a single continuously developing economic infrastructure and accelerating the adoption of full-fledged market principles of operation by all socio-economic systems of the world.

Within the framework of the accelerating evolution of social and economic institutions, the multi-currency market system of the old type, established during a long historical period, ceases to be relevant in terms of its inconsistency with modern demands and the growing globalization of markets. The changed logic of world economy development, processes of decentralization of relations between economic subjects in the global network and appearance of global markets accessible to each inhabitant of the Earth in the virtual environment have led to appearance of decentralized means of exchange, whose acceptance and popularity seem to be logical phenomena.

The financial authorities of the world are faced with the necessity of reforming the monetary system due to the hitherto unprecedented spontaneous modernisation of global finance. In the global economy of the future the exchange rates of national currencies, which in theory are supposed to reflect the demand for the local gross product produced in them, will lose their relevance. Instead of competition between national currencies representing (1) the gross domestic product and (2) the local economic environment, we will see a more sympathetic competition between industry currencies, where the role of the local economic environment will gradually diminish. How did we arrive at this conclusion?

As such, universal money did not and still does not carry in itself the use value of exchangeable valuables. In its time, as an essence giving market liquidity to all forms of property, it took the form of a calculable symbol of wealth that was convenient to store and record - gold. Being merely an intermediary in the exchange of value, gold nevertheless possessed valuable qualities and functionality in terms of intermediation and the ability to provide liquidity in commodity exchange until about the middle of the 18th century. The symbiosis of these valuable qualities and the universal character of this means of exchange (everything can be bought for gold) made gold itself an absolute value and the most coveted commodity with the most powerful demand and supply. This circumstance exalted the intermediary in trade BEFORE the exchanged values of various branches, which had a real use value for a man. The ultimate goal of man's trade-productive activity all over the world became the desire to earn as much conventional gold as possible.

It could not be otherwise with the former level of consciousness and technologies, for it was necessary to solve the problem of making money liquid and transferring speed to satisfy the growing scales of commodity turnover. Universal means of exchange coped with the task of their own modernization in this very way. Each new stage of their modernization, mainly starting from the 19th century, was an adequate response to growth of production volumes, productivity and expansion of geographical scale of trade operations as a result of scientific and technological revolution. So first, banknotes replaced the less liquid metal, becoming, in effect, a token of gold backed by gold bank vaults. Then, in the 20th century, following the increase in global commodity turnover, banknotes were already replaced by electronic records thanks to the development of information technology. Finally, the final abandonment of the gold standard in 1975 was already the first qualitative manifestation of the evolution of money in terms of "tying" them to values - the mass of goods. Money began to reflect real GDP produced by economies to a greater extent than before through market mechanisms. But, because of its universality and susceptibility to non-market regulation, money cannot be considered secured by the real commodity mass in full measure, distorts fair value and remains a "value in itself" - the most coveted goal in the process of creation.

Today, gold has been replaced by the U.S. dollar as universal money, but the essence has not changed. In addition, being a national currency, even in the most developed country, the dollar "drags" the lion's share of surplus value in favor of a certain part of the world population, rather than in favor of producers of the most demanded categories of value, regardless of geography of production and nationality. Hence the destructive fiddling associated with trade wars and currency manipulation by the authorities of competing economies.

The difference in prices for different groups of goods denominated in gold, dollar or bitcoin because of their universality does not reflect the real ratio of supply and demand for different types of products: if the rate of return on production of boots or potato chips is equal, a person will choose production of the commodity that is less labor-intensive - chips. This is despite the fact that society's need for boots is probably higher. If each industry had its own currency, the exchange rate of the "boot" currency would be higher, which would lead to an influx of investment in that particular industry, and the shoemaker would increase his welfare at the expense of a higher exchange rate of his currency.

This discrepancy occurs because gold, the dollar, or bitcoin are the primary end goal of production or trade. - Mathematically speaking, the "common denominator" for all assets to determine the price of each. There is no variable in this equation that takes into account the degree of real utility of each asset or product. The greatest benefit should come from the creation of the value most needed by the individual at the moment, rather than the extraction of price units. Yes, to some extent gold or dollar solved the problems of the market in terms of simplifying the exchange process. Now the possibility of eliminating the economy's age-old dependence on the hegemony of the intermediary - gold in all its forms (the dollar, bitcoin, etc.) is becoming clearer.

If each industry had its own secured currency and had the necessary qualities of money, this disadvantage would be eliminated by direct exchange without the intermediary of universal money. Producers of more demanded commodity categories would gain a market advantage in the form of higher profits or inflows of investment from less demanded industries due to the high exchange rate of their sectoral currency.

While bitcoin has solved a number of shortcomings of modern money, it also carries with it the inherent lack of universality of money. It is essentially the next generation of good old-fashioned but useless gold. Plus, bitcoin, being the "best gold" in terms of its absolute rarity, is simply doomed to perpetual appreciation due to its deflationary nature. But then a bitcoin investor is less interested in investing in projects with any kind of long production cycle, because there is a high probability that the future benefit from the project will be lower than the guaranteed benefit from simply keeping bitcoin in the wallet.

It turns out that bitcoin does not stimulate creative activity, but inhibits it, despite a number of advantages over "old money".

Whereas the dollar, being centralized, on the contrary, due to unjustified emission, over time depreciates people's savings in unsecured currency.

The differences between bitcoin and the dollar in this context are just two sides of the same coin - the universal nature of the intermediary function of money not related to created value.

As a result, in both cases the reason for economic activity is the desire to possess more and more universal means of exchange. Whereas in the case of a sectoral multicurrency monetary system, to achieve the same goal - wealth accumulation - a person could more accurately identify the values most sought after by society, as these would be the ones that bring the greatest profit. Obviously, gold, the dollar or bitcoin, being universal means of exchange, have been an end in themselves to economic activity since long ago and until now.

The nature of today's money in any of its existing forms distorts the value of the objects of exchange, and hence the economic essence of trade.

A universal medium of exchange in any form "draws" value on itself, becoming an object of accumulation, a meaningless commodity and a symbol of wealth in one person. Whereas wealth formed from sectoral currencies would motivate a person to move capital periodically, supporting precisely the sector that is in high demand. From the point of view of market logic and economics, this is true if one takes the understanding of this issue seriously.

We are confident that as the global industry infrastructure develops, consciously or by instinct, the monetary system will change according to the logic described above. Not only that, but the level of information technology is already ready for it, and its integration into the global financial market infrastructure is just a matter of time.

Industry enterprises with the necessary infrastructure that will participate in a properly designed tokenization will have a competitive advantage over other players, as they will be the first beneficiaries of the growth of industry currency capitalization right from the start. And the industry they represent will become a pioneer in the process of industries acquiring their own currency, with all the resulting positive consequences for it.

We have developed a tokenization project concept in which enterprises will not incur any commercial risks, nor will changes be required in their ownership and management structure or in their business processes. But the most important feature of the tokenization project we have developed is the combination of perfect security, guaranteed capitalization growth and exchange rate growth in a token relative to other financial assets and even currencies.

Key criteria for an industry ready for such tokenization:

▪ The industry's products represent value   of a strategic nature or have a global demand;

▪ Availability of warehouses, hubs or other storage facilities for finished products or strategic raw materials in the industry, equipped with precise accounting systems. Their role would be similar to that of bank vaults for gold as collateral for banknotes;

▪ The ideal criterion is for companies in the industry to have storage facilities (finished product storage) equipped with smart precision metering sensors to stream them to cloud databases.

An essential feature of our proposed project concept is a mechanism of guaranteed economic effect for all market participants. But, being the sources of economic benefits themselves, industry players are its main beneficiaries.

Having studied the proposed principle of financial interaction between market participants in case of project implementation, you will see that it is logical for the economy of any industry. But it is the green energy industry, due to its specifics, that already has the infrastructure ideally suited for the full-fledged tokenization of its product - electricity.

The energy industry occupies the most important place in the global economy, since energy is a basic resource for mankind as well as for all living things.

We have no doubt that in the near future, renewable energy producers will become similar to oil and gas companies in terms of the profits they generate as a result of the growing attractiveness of the industry for investors. This will happen sooner or later as new technologies develop and emerge that increase the efficiency of renewable energy generation. We have found a way to increase the wealth of green energy producers and attract market capital to the industry now, and we are confident that this project will bring the future closer.

To provide an inflow of investments into green energy by a market mechanism through tokenization of energy in Storage Systems (accumulating accumulators). The idea is to create a real energy secured token with profitable tokenomics for investors. As a result, making green energy a liquid commodity on a global scale.

Practical purpose

Make the capital market available to green energy producers. Provide green energy players and the industry as a whole with a market-based tool for attracting investment to develop and grow the wealth of industry players. Make the industry profitable for private investment, which would in turn remove the need for national governments to subsidize it with taxpayer funds.

A FULL DESCRIPTION OF TOKENOMICS AND THE MECHANISM OF INTERACTION OF MARKET PARTICIPANTS FOLLOWS...

INDUSTRIAL CURRENCY IS A TOOL FOR A FAIR REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH AND

BRIDGE FOR THE FLOW OF CAPITAL TO THE COMMUNITY OF CREATORS

Processes of globalization of the world economy and the evolution of human civilization "flatten" the differences between the economies of different countries by integrating them into a single continuously developing economic infrastructure and accelerating the adoption of full-fledged market principles of operation by all socio-economic systems of the world.

Within the framework of the accelerating evolution of social and economic institutions, the multi-currency market system of the old type, established during a long historical period, ceases to be relevant in terms of its inconsistency with modern demands and the growing globalization of markets. The changed logic of world economy development, processes of decentralization of relations between economic subjects in the global network and appearance of global markets accessible to each inhabitant of the Earth in the virtual environment have led to appearance of decentralized means of exchange, whose acceptance and popularity seem to be logical phenomena.

The financial authorities of the world are faced with the necessity of reforming the monetary system due to the hitherto unprecedented spontaneous modernisation of global finance. In the global economy of the future the exchange rates of national currencies, which in theory are supposed to reflect the demand for the local gross product produced in them, will lose their relevance. Instead of competition between national currencies representing (1) the gross domestic product and (2) the local economic environment, we will see a more sympathetic competition between industry currencies, where the role of the local economic environment will gradually diminish. How did we arrive at this conclusion?

As such, universal money did not and still does not carry in itself the use value of exchangeable valuables. In its time, as an essence giving market liquidity to all forms of property, it took the form of a calculable symbol of wealth that was convenient to store and record - gold. Being merely an intermediary in the exchange of value, gold nevertheless possessed valuable qualities and functionality in terms of intermediation and the ability to provide liquidity in commodity exchange until about the middle of the 18th century. The symbiosis of these valuable qualities and the universal character of this means of exchange (everything can be bought for gold) made gold itself an absolute value and the most coveted commodity with the most powerful demand and supply. This circumstance exalted the intermediary in trade BEFORE the exchanged values of various branches, which had a real use value for a man. The ultimate goal of man's trade-productive activity all over the world became the desire to earn as much conventional gold as possible.

It could not be otherwise with the former level of consciousness and technologies, for it was necessary to solve the problem of making money liquid and transferring speed to satisfy the growing scales of commodity turnover. Universal means of exchange coped with the task of their own modernization in this very way. Each new stage of their modernization, mainly starting from the 19th century, was an adequate response to growth of production volumes, productivity and expansion of geographical scale of trade operations as a result of scientific and technological revolution. So first, banknotes replaced the less liquid metal, becoming, in effect, a token of gold backed by gold bank vaults. Then, in the 20th century, following the increase in global commodity turnover, banknotes were already replaced by electronic records thanks to the development of information technology. Finally, the final abandonment of the gold standard in 1975 was already the first qualitative manifestation of the evolution of money in terms of "tying" them to values - the mass of goods. Money began to reflect real GDP produced by economies to a greater extent than before through market mechanisms. But, because of its universality and susceptibility to non-market regulation, money cannot be considered secured by the real commodity mass in full measure, distorts fair value and remains a "value in itself" - the most coveted goal in the process of creation.

Today, gold has been replaced by the U.S. dollar as universal money, but the essence has not changed. In addition, being a national currency, even in the most developed country, the dollar "drags" the lion's share of surplus value in favor of a certain part of the world population, rather than in favor of producers of the most demanded categories of value, regardless of geography of production and nationality. Hence the destructive fiddling associated with trade wars and currency manipulation by the authorities of competing economies.

The difference in prices for different groups of goods denominated in gold, dollar or bitcoin because of their universality does not reflect the real ratio of supply and demand for different types of products: if the rate of return on production of boots or potato chips is equal, a person will choose production of the commodity that is less labor-intensive - chips. This is despite the fact that society's need for boots is probably higher. If each industry had its own currency, the exchange rate of the "boot" currency would be higher, which would lead to an influx of investment in that particular industry, and the shoemaker would increase his welfare at the expense of a higher exchange rate of his currency.

This discrepancy occurs because gold, the dollar, or bitcoin are the primary end goal of production or trade. - Mathematically speaking, the "common denominator" for all assets to determine the price of each. There is no variable in this equation that takes into account the degree of real utility of each asset or product. The greatest benefit should come from the creation of the value most needed by the individual at the moment, rather than the extraction of price units. Yes, to some extent gold or dollar solved the problems of the market in terms of simplifying the exchange process. Now the possibility of eliminating the economy's age-old dependence on the hegemony of the intermediary - gold in all its forms (the dollar, bitcoin, etc.) is becoming clearer.

If each industry had its own secured currency and had the necessary qualities of money, this disadvantage would be eliminated by direct exchange without the intermediary of universal money. Producers of more demanded commodity categories would gain a market advantage in the form of higher profits or inflows of investment from less demanded industries due to the high exchange rate of their sectoral currency.

While bitcoin has solved a number of shortcomings of modern money, it also carries with it the inherent lack of universality of money. It is essentially the next generation of good old-fashioned but useless gold. Plus, bitcoin, being the "best gold" in terms of its absolute rarity, is simply doomed to perpetual appreciation due to its deflationary nature. But then a bitcoin investor is less interested in investing in projects with any kind of long production cycle, because there is a high probability that the future benefit from the project will be lower than the guaranteed benefit from simply keeping bitcoin in the wallet.

It turns out that bitcoin does not stimulate creative activity, but inhibits it, despite a number of advantages over "old money".

Whereas the dollar, being centralized, on the contrary, due to unjustified emission, over time depreciates people's savings in unsecured currency.

The differences between bitcoin and the dollar in this context are just two sides of the same coin - the universal nature of the intermediary function of money not related to created value.

As a result, in both cases the reason for economic activity is the desire to possess more and more universal means of exchange. Whereas in the case of a sectoral multicurrency monetary system, to achieve the same goal - wealth accumulation - a person could more accurately identify the values most sought after by society, as these would be the ones that bring the greatest profit. Obviously, gold, the dollar or bitcoin, being universal means of exchange, have been an end in themselves to economic activity since long ago and until now.

The nature of today's money in any of its existing forms distorts the value of the objects of exchange, and hence the economic essence of trade.

A universal medium of exchange in any form "draws" value on itself, becoming an object of accumulation, a meaningless commodity and a symbol of wealth in one person. Whereas wealth formed from sectoral currencies would motivate a person to move capital periodically, supporting precisely the sector that is in high demand. From the point of view of market logic and economics, this is true if one takes the understanding of this issue seriously.

We are confident that as the global industry infrastructure develops, consciously or by instinct, the monetary system will change according to the logic described above. Not only that, but the level of information technology is already ready for it, and its integration into the global financial market infrastructure is just a matter of time.

Industry enterprises with the necessary infrastructure that will participate in a properly designed tokenization will have a competitive advantage over other players, as they will be the first beneficiaries of the growth of industry currency capitalization right from the start. And the industry they represent will become a pioneer in the process of industries acquiring their own currency, with all the resulting positive consequences for it.

We have developed a tokenization project concept in which enterprises will not incur any commercial risks, nor will changes be required in their ownership and management structure or in their business processes. But the most important feature of the tokenization project we have developed is the combination of perfect security, guaranteed capitalization growth and exchange rate growth in a token relative to other financial assets and even currencies.

Key criteria for an industry ready for such tokenization:

▪ The industry's products represent value   of a strategic nature or have a global demand;

▪ Availability of warehouses, hubs or other storage facilities for finished products or strategic raw materials in the industry, equipped with precise accounting systems. Their role would be similar to that of bank vaults for gold as collateral for banknotes;

▪ The ideal criterion is for companies in the industry to have storage facilities (finished product storage) equipped with smart precision metering sensors to stream them to cloud databases.

An essential feature of our proposed project concept is a mechanism of guaranteed economic effect for all market participants. But, being the sources of economic benefits themselves, industry players are its main beneficiaries.

Having studied the proposed principle of financial interaction between market participants in case of project implementation, you will see that it is logical for the economy of any industry. But it is the green energy industry, due to its specifics, that already has the infrastructure ideally suited for the full-fledged tokenization of its product - electricity.

The energy industry occupies the most important place in the global economy, since energy is a basic resource for mankind as well as for all living things.

We have no doubt that in the near future, renewable energy producers will become similar to oil and gas companies in terms of the profits they generate as a result of the growing attractiveness of the industry for investors. This will happen sooner or later as new technologies develop and emerge that increase the efficiency of renewable energy generation. We have found a way to increase the wealth of green energy producers and attract market capital to the industry now, and we are confident that this project will bring the future closer.

To provide an inflow of investments into green energy by a market mechanism through tokenization of energy in Storage Systems (accumulating accumulators). The idea is to create a real energy secured token with profitable tokenomics for investors. As a result, making green energy a liquid commodity on a global scale.

Practical purpose

Make the capital market available to green energy producers. Provide green energy players and the industry as a whole with a market-based tool for attracting investment to develop and grow the wealth of industry players. Make the industry profitable for private investment, which would in turn remove the need for national governments to subsidize it with taxpayer funds.

A FULL DESCRIPTION OF TOKENOMICS AND THE MECHANISM OF INTERACTION OF MARKET PARTICIPANTS FOLLOWS...