Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanTeaching you how to use “Twitterscan” to discover NFT wealth
Introduction Twitterscan is a tool that can help users quickly locate popular projects (token or NFT), judge high-quality users, discover new projects, and identify popular topics. The beta1.6 version of the tool includes 5 major sections (Trending Tokens, Trending KOL, New Projects, Trending Topics) and a global search function. Next, I will show you how to use each function panel one by one. Function showcase New NFT ProjectThis functional module is Twitterscan's flagship product, whic...
Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanTwitterScan Raffle Guideline
TwitterScan provides APIs for many platforms, including okx, huobi, bybit, bitkepp, tokenpocket, cyberconnect, nftscan, nftgo, kingdata, une, bitkeep, 98k dao, etc. have all received APIs. After the twitterscan list is equal to the whole network list. This is a flow tool. Login In twitterscan After any user logs in to twitterscan, you can see the lucky draw button "Create Raffle" in the personal centerCreate RaffleWhen the number of Twitter followers is greater than 1,000 and the account has ...
Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanMetaScan: Starting with TwitterScan, building an ecological map across Web2 to Web3
MetaScan: Starting with TwitterScan, building an ecological map across Web2 to Web3How do you quickly assess the value of an NFT collection? Investors and traders use different metrics to assess, most of them are based on the trading data of the corresponding NFT collection, some of them also monitor the popularity of the relevant NFT trend on social media and within communities. The difference between the two metrics is that trading data is on-chain and transparent, which has given rise to a...
a user centered subversive web3.0 social trading network#1 source of #NFT Twitter Analytic Tool web3 Influencers Tracking+ Twitter Analysis
Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanTeaching you how to use “Twitterscan” to discover NFT wealth
Introduction Twitterscan is a tool that can help users quickly locate popular projects (token or NFT), judge high-quality users, discover new projects, and identify popular topics. The beta1.6 version of the tool includes 5 major sections (Trending Tokens, Trending KOL, New Projects, Trending Topics) and a global search function. Next, I will show you how to use each function panel one by one. Function showcase New NFT ProjectThis functional module is Twitterscan's flagship product, whic...
Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanTwitterScan Raffle Guideline
TwitterScan provides APIs for many platforms, including okx, huobi, bybit, bitkepp, tokenpocket, cyberconnect, nftscan, nftgo, kingdata, une, bitkeep, 98k dao, etc. have all received APIs. After the twitterscan list is equal to the whole network list. This is a flow tool. Login In twitterscan After any user logs in to twitterscan, you can see the lucky draw button "Create Raffle" in the personal centerCreate RaffleWhen the number of Twitter followers is greater than 1,000 and the account has ...
Metascan.Pro | TwitterscanMetaScan: Starting with TwitterScan, building an ecological map across Web2 to Web3
MetaScan: Starting with TwitterScan, building an ecological map across Web2 to Web3How do you quickly assess the value of an NFT collection? Investors and traders use different metrics to assess, most of them are based on the trading data of the corresponding NFT collection, some of them also monitor the popularity of the relevant NFT trend on social media and within communities. The difference between the two metrics is that trading data is on-chain and transparent, which has given rise to a...
a user centered subversive web3.0 social trading network#1 source of #NFT Twitter Analytic Tool web3 Influencers Tracking+ Twitter Analysis
Subscribe to Metascan.Pro | Twitterscan
Subscribe to Metascan.Pro | Twitterscan
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Recently $RND became a hit because of the huge increase in token price. However, most people only saw the increase but not the reasons behind.
Some people may say that because some people bought it, there were large investors operating funds, the market sentiment has arrived, and the short position is over.
These are only on the surface, the real information, hidden in on-chain purchase records and casual remarks on the Internet. Well, I saw it and read it. The reasons why I am willing to say is because in addition to the tool products I am making, it is also because the big players have started a social experiment, and this lab was born out of $SHIB.
Yes, you read that right, there is an inevitable connection between the two, except that it looks like an accident, more of is it’s the same person behind the scenes.
We're talking about the hot $RND right now. We analyze RND from the following dimensions, starting with on-chain data analysis.
According to information on ethplorer.io, we checked the top ten addresses and in turn we see how their tokens are obtained.
The first is 38%, the second is 12%, and the third is Poloniex. The first and second are written in the previous contract, and the third is an exchange.
Let's start with the fourth one. It was found that this address received the first token from 2022-2-6, which was released from the contract.
This means that the owner of this address noticed the project very early and received the token. He/she started purchasing since 2022-2-7.
The price of first purchases is not high, I personally tend to keep a wait-and-see attitude towards this project and give it a try. There is a gene for curiosity about new things. This is the greatest possibility for a person to make money in the currency circle and that is to always remain curious about new things. Also, be cautious about new things, such as going ‘all in’.
On 2022-2-7, this address purchased RND from the uniswap transaction pool unexpectedly. I also noticed that the address was transferring $RND tokens from other addresses.
It indicates that the holder of this address also has records of other addresses purchasing $RND. It's a good habit to buy with different addresses, so no one else notices in the early days.
According to the public records of ethplorer, the address spent a total of 0.8 ETH through uniswap. Obviously, this purchase amount is not enough to become the 4th largest holding address. From public records, most of the tokens were transferred from another address.
Then we go to check how many tokens were purchased by the transferred address.
Taking advantage of nansen's wallet profiler for token feature. We now know that a total of 1.21T tokens were purchased for that address.
716.9 billion tokens were transferred to the 4th-ranked address.
Added 290 billion tokens to uniswap pool.
Then the address still holds 120 billion tokens.
Bought 27 times.
The two addresses combined made 31 purchases, costing about 35 ETH.
Obtained income is 671677+120152=791,829 usdt income + 290 billion uniswap LP income.
The ETH required by LP is: 4+2+3.2=9.2ETH
To understand the amount of 1.21T, the total amount of RND is 37.8T, which means that the owner of this address purchased a total of 3.2% of the total amount of tokens.
Except for the two addresses of 12%+38%, it is the one with the most tokens on the market.
The 4th ranked address holds 727B of $RND.
It is very strange that this address is not displayed in the nansen token god mode, and the current price, market value and other information of the token are not correctly parsed. It means that nansen does not fully parse protocols such as uni but calls of other data sources.
We have finished analyzing the fourth-ranked address. Let's see if there is any other interesting information about the other addresses in the top ten.
The fifth is the contract address of uniswap V3, which holds 1.36% of the amount.
There is a total of 513B tokens. Combining the above, we know that the fourth-ranked address in this contract provides 290 billion LPs. Although the data has shifted, we can assume that most of the fifth-ranked contract addresses are liquidity provided by the fourth-ranked address.
It is quite scary to think of this, it is equivalent to saying that except the initiator of this project, it is the holder of this address who has the final say.
Next, we look at what’s happening to the 6th-ranked address.
The number is neat and interesting. Let's take a closer look at the data on the chain.
Through nansen's token profiler for token, we can clearly see the inflow and outflow.
This address, while buying a large number of tokens from dex, eventually locked the token amount at 450 billion. At the same time, the token initially entered into the account did not come from the dex transactions but was transferred from another address. Let's take a look at what this address is like.
This address is marked by nansen as passive uniswap V3 LP, and the address $RND is inactive for sufficient time to provide transaction volume. It is not use for the purpose of purchasing, but for the purpose of brushing orders to create an operation where someone buys and sells. It means that the address brushes orders for the other addresses.
This address is marked by nansen as passive uniswap V3 LP, and the address $RND is inactive for sufficient time to provide transaction volume. It is not use for the purpose of purchasing, but for the purpose of brushing orders to create an operation where someone buys and sells. It means that the address brushes orders for the other addresses.
We analyze the 6th-ranked address, which was purchased from 2022-2-21 to 2022-3-7. This period is a period when the currency price is low, and no one buys. It's a great time to stock up on coins at low prices. If the address is an old address with many other transaction records, then it has a high probability that this address has nothing to do with the fourth-ranked address above.
However, when I checked the registration time of the address through my browser, I found something tricky.
This address is a brand-new address and only has record of withdrawing coins from OKex.
The address transferred ETH from the previous addresses.
Explaining that the sixth-ranked address and the frequently traded address are the same person or people acting concurrently.
The original ETH of the address where the transaction is usually done is also from OKEX withdrawal.
The new addresses were generated on 2022-2-10 & 2022-2-21 respectively. There is almost no transaction data for the changed period.
Each OKEX address is 0xA7EFAe728D2936e78BDA97dc267687568dD593f3
Just ask yourselves, who will take the initiative to brush orders when there is no trading volume, except those with the greatest at stake. Who is motivated to open a new account, make a confusion about withdrawing money from the exchange, and then quietly buy tokens on dex, buying to the sixth. The total amount of coins held is 1.19%. It is also the one with the greatest at stake.
I am making a bold guess. Behind the addresses ranked No. 4, No. 6, there are people with the same interests, or the same person.
In the liquidity pool ranked No. 5, most of the liquidity is also controlled by the above-mentioned personnel.
Let's see what is happening to the 7th-ranked address.
When observing the transaction records through ethplorer, I keenly found a token, not $RND, but $MOONEY.
Why am I so vigilant about this token, because this token also appeared in the addresses I checked previously.
At the same time that these three appeared $RND, other identical tokens appeared, which made my nerves tense up unconsciously.
I used the nansen wallet pair profiler function to see if there is a correlation between the addresses, because there may be transfers of other tokens between the user's multiple wallets.
On the left is the address that is strongly associated with the sixth-ranked address, and on the right is the seventh-ranked address. Both had an ETH transfer 3 days ago.
Again, the two addresses are either acquaintances or persons acting concurrently.
At this point, the addresses ranked 4, 5, 6, and 7 are all associated. So far, I do not care how much the 7th-ranked address spended on RND. I just want to know if the other addresses in the top 10 are related. . . . .
As a result, I found something different in the 10th place. This address is a new address, generated on 2022-3-11, and only withdraws coins from FTX, and then only buys $RND.
This address may be associated with the previous large holders.
Remark:
Current #4 address: 0xb54640d76AAB622214607833CCF3118A4810E151
Current #5 address: 0x96b0837489d046a4f5aa9ac2fc9e086bd14bac1e
Address currently ranked 6: 0x328d8A57A9e89Da18e8331Eb8218292CccB37379
Current 7th address: 0xacc6233b0aBc7327Ed0C71084328d172161F1297
Current 10th address: 0x735BC20Cd8ca6495913A9196253a95e43347B09E
The above information is what I interpreted from the chain, and does not involve Twitter’s keyword analysis.
Interpret it through the position address, transaction record, associated address, purchase time, and other token information in the address. Potential associations with the current top ten addresses in $RND were found. It is possible that the bookmaker holds about 5% of the liquidity in the market.
I'm a product manager on the metascan.pro team, and I'm good at interpreting on-chain information. The interpretation of the above information is based on ethplorer + nansen + etherscan. The product I created hopes to open the correlation between the data on the chain and the data on the Internet, helping users analyze valuable information. I believe that readers can understand my sensitivity to information on chain transactions through the above analysis. I also hope to convert this kind of sensitivity to information into a program and present it to the user in a visual way.
We will also interpret more popular tokens, including how to see the surge of shib from the chain, etc. Follow us and stay tuned.
Twitter ID： MetascanPro
Discord：
Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.
Recently $RND became a hit because of the huge increase in token price. However, most people only saw the increase but not the reasons behind.
Some people may say that because some people bought it, there were large investors operating funds, the market sentiment has arrived, and the short position is over.
These are only on the surface, the real information, hidden in on-chain purchase records and casual remarks on the Internet. Well, I saw it and read it. The reasons why I am willing to say is because in addition to the tool products I am making, it is also because the big players have started a social experiment, and this lab was born out of $SHIB.
Yes, you read that right, there is an inevitable connection between the two, except that it looks like an accident, more of is it’s the same person behind the scenes.
We're talking about the hot $RND right now. We analyze RND from the following dimensions, starting with on-chain data analysis.
According to information on ethplorer.io, we checked the top ten addresses and in turn we see how their tokens are obtained.
The first is 38%, the second is 12%, and the third is Poloniex. The first and second are written in the previous contract, and the third is an exchange.
Let's start with the fourth one. It was found that this address received the first token from 2022-2-6, which was released from the contract.
This means that the owner of this address noticed the project very early and received the token. He/she started purchasing since 2022-2-7.
The price of first purchases is not high, I personally tend to keep a wait-and-see attitude towards this project and give it a try. There is a gene for curiosity about new things. This is the greatest possibility for a person to make money in the currency circle and that is to always remain curious about new things. Also, be cautious about new things, such as going ‘all in’.
On 2022-2-7, this address purchased RND from the uniswap transaction pool unexpectedly. I also noticed that the address was transferring $RND tokens from other addresses.
It indicates that the holder of this address also has records of other addresses purchasing $RND. It's a good habit to buy with different addresses, so no one else notices in the early days.
According to the public records of ethplorer, the address spent a total of 0.8 ETH through uniswap. Obviously, this purchase amount is not enough to become the 4th largest holding address. From public records, most of the tokens were transferred from another address.
Then we go to check how many tokens were purchased by the transferred address.
Taking advantage of nansen's wallet profiler for token feature. We now know that a total of 1.21T tokens were purchased for that address.
716.9 billion tokens were transferred to the 4th-ranked address.
Added 290 billion tokens to uniswap pool.
Then the address still holds 120 billion tokens.
Bought 27 times.
The two addresses combined made 31 purchases, costing about 35 ETH.
Obtained income is 671677+120152=791,829 usdt income + 290 billion uniswap LP income.
The ETH required by LP is: 4+2+3.2=9.2ETH
To understand the amount of 1.21T, the total amount of RND is 37.8T, which means that the owner of this address purchased a total of 3.2% of the total amount of tokens.
Except for the two addresses of 12%+38%, it is the one with the most tokens on the market.
The 4th ranked address holds 727B of $RND.
It is very strange that this address is not displayed in the nansen token god mode, and the current price, market value and other information of the token are not correctly parsed. It means that nansen does not fully parse protocols such as uni but calls of other data sources.
We have finished analyzing the fourth-ranked address. Let's see if there is any other interesting information about the other addresses in the top ten.
The fifth is the contract address of uniswap V3, which holds 1.36% of the amount.
There is a total of 513B tokens. Combining the above, we know that the fourth-ranked address in this contract provides 290 billion LPs. Although the data has shifted, we can assume that most of the fifth-ranked contract addresses are liquidity provided by the fourth-ranked address.
It is quite scary to think of this, it is equivalent to saying that except the initiator of this project, it is the holder of this address who has the final say.
Next, we look at what’s happening to the 6th-ranked address.
The number is neat and interesting. Let's take a closer look at the data on the chain.
Through nansen's token profiler for token, we can clearly see the inflow and outflow.
This address, while buying a large number of tokens from dex, eventually locked the token amount at 450 billion. At the same time, the token initially entered into the account did not come from the dex transactions but was transferred from another address. Let's take a look at what this address is like.
This address is marked by nansen as passive uniswap V3 LP, and the address $RND is inactive for sufficient time to provide transaction volume. It is not use for the purpose of purchasing, but for the purpose of brushing orders to create an operation where someone buys and sells. It means that the address brushes orders for the other addresses.
This address is marked by nansen as passive uniswap V3 LP, and the address $RND is inactive for sufficient time to provide transaction volume. It is not use for the purpose of purchasing, but for the purpose of brushing orders to create an operation where someone buys and sells. It means that the address brushes orders for the other addresses.
We analyze the 6th-ranked address, which was purchased from 2022-2-21 to 2022-3-7. This period is a period when the currency price is low, and no one buys. It's a great time to stock up on coins at low prices. If the address is an old address with many other transaction records, then it has a high probability that this address has nothing to do with the fourth-ranked address above.
However, when I checked the registration time of the address through my browser, I found something tricky.
This address is a brand-new address and only has record of withdrawing coins from OKex.
The address transferred ETH from the previous addresses.
Explaining that the sixth-ranked address and the frequently traded address are the same person or people acting concurrently.
The original ETH of the address where the transaction is usually done is also from OKEX withdrawal.
The new addresses were generated on 2022-2-10 & 2022-2-21 respectively. There is almost no transaction data for the changed period.
Each OKEX address is 0xA7EFAe728D2936e78BDA97dc267687568dD593f3
Just ask yourselves, who will take the initiative to brush orders when there is no trading volume, except those with the greatest at stake. Who is motivated to open a new account, make a confusion about withdrawing money from the exchange, and then quietly buy tokens on dex, buying to the sixth. The total amount of coins held is 1.19%. It is also the one with the greatest at stake.
I am making a bold guess. Behind the addresses ranked No. 4, No. 6, there are people with the same interests, or the same person.
In the liquidity pool ranked No. 5, most of the liquidity is also controlled by the above-mentioned personnel.
Let's see what is happening to the 7th-ranked address.
When observing the transaction records through ethplorer, I keenly found a token, not $RND, but $MOONEY.
Why am I so vigilant about this token, because this token also appeared in the addresses I checked previously.
At the same time that these three appeared $RND, other identical tokens appeared, which made my nerves tense up unconsciously.
I used the nansen wallet pair profiler function to see if there is a correlation between the addresses, because there may be transfers of other tokens between the user's multiple wallets.
On the left is the address that is strongly associated with the sixth-ranked address, and on the right is the seventh-ranked address. Both had an ETH transfer 3 days ago.
Again, the two addresses are either acquaintances or persons acting concurrently.
At this point, the addresses ranked 4, 5, 6, and 7 are all associated. So far, I do not care how much the 7th-ranked address spended on RND. I just want to know if the other addresses in the top 10 are related. . . . .
As a result, I found something different in the 10th place. This address is a new address, generated on 2022-3-11, and only withdraws coins from FTX, and then only buys $RND.
This address may be associated with the previous large holders.
Remark:
Current #4 address: 0xb54640d76AAB622214607833CCF3118A4810E151
Current #5 address: 0x96b0837489d046a4f5aa9ac2fc9e086bd14bac1e
Address currently ranked 6: 0x328d8A57A9e89Da18e8331Eb8218292CccB37379
Current 7th address: 0xacc6233b0aBc7327Ed0C71084328d172161F1297
Current 10th address: 0x735BC20Cd8ca6495913A9196253a95e43347B09E
The above information is what I interpreted from the chain, and does not involve Twitter’s keyword analysis.
Interpret it through the position address, transaction record, associated address, purchase time, and other token information in the address. Potential associations with the current top ten addresses in $RND were found. It is possible that the bookmaker holds about 5% of the liquidity in the market.
I'm a product manager on the metascan.pro team, and I'm good at interpreting on-chain information. The interpretation of the above information is based on ethplorer + nansen + etherscan. The product I created hopes to open the correlation between the data on the chain and the data on the Internet, helping users analyze valuable information. I believe that readers can understand my sensitivity to information on chain transactions through the above analysis. I also hope to convert this kind of sensitivity to information into a program and present it to the user in a visual way.
We will also interpret more popular tokens, including how to see the surge of shib from the chain, etc. Follow us and stay tuned.
Twitter ID： MetascanPro
Discord：
Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.
No activity yet