I’ve been thinking about how outdated streaming pricing feels — compared to gaming.

In gaming, they’ve figured out consumer surplus: some players (the “whales”) willingly spend hundreds through in-app purchases, limited drops, or skins, etc. The model lets them express that willingness to pay.
Streaming once had its own version through windowed releases — pay more for early access — but gave that up for simplicity: one flat monthly fee for everything.

Now, ad tiers are supposed to bring back pricing flexibility. But here’s the question — do they really capture more surplus, or less?
If I’m a heavy watcher on an ad tier, am I actually generating more ARPU than someone on a higher-priced ad-free plan? Or did the service just give me a cheaper option I would’ve paid more for if that were the only choice?

📺 Maybe the economics are just different. Gaming and live events thrive on variable pricing and a few high-spending users. Streaming, meanwhile, relies on scale — millions of moderate-paying users, not whales.
But in a world where people cancel or pause subscriptions right after their favorite show ends, are streamers even capturing any surplus?
The consumer has become too smart — they pay for what they want, binge, and leave, often getting more value than what they paid for.

So what if we started rethinking pricing itself — more like gaming?
-- Could Disney sell Marvel Coins to access Marvel content across any platform like Disney+, Hulu, or even elsewhere?

--What if platforms offered prepaid or weekly passes, so users pay upfront without the free trial trap — and can later convert that to a longer plan?

--Could studios price content categories differently based on fandom or viewing elasticity, instead of using one-size-fits-all pricing?

Just thought starters — ways to show how streaming could evolve beyond “flat fee forever.” Or is to too late?

I think its about designing systems that let consumers express their willingness to pay — just like in gaming.