Subscribe to Network Goods Institute
Support Network Goods Institute
Network Goods InstituteIntroducing Negation Game: A New Canvas for Collaborative Reasoning
Network Goods InstituteNegation Game: An Info Market for the Overton Window
InfoFi is on the rise. Crypto has been on a decades-long journey to find its killer application. It's been found, and now it's being acknowledged by the wider society: Prediction Markets The power comes from creating markets where the self-interested objectives of searching for upside produce positive externalities in the form of reliable information. If you make those markets competitive enough, you can trust the bottom-line to reasonably correlate with reality Prediction Markets work great ...
Network Goods InstituteEpistocracy
How Markets Can Reward Being Wrong
Network Goods InstituteWhy decline VC?
Recently, Volky and I made the fairly difficult choice not to accept the 1.2m funding offer that BlueYard made. What I hope to very briefly do is to communicate why VC isn't the funding path we'll be pursuing. Long story short, we feel that because of the particular thing we’re building, there are options for how to fund ourselves and make us sustainable that are better incentive aligned and more true to our values.What are we building?With the Network Goods Institute, Volky and I are interes...
>200 subscribers
Subscribe to Network Goods Institute
>200 subscribers
Support Network Goods Institute
Network Goods InstituteIntroducing Negation Game: A New Canvas for Collaborative Reasoning
Network Goods InstituteNegation Game: An Info Market for the Overton Window
InfoFi is on the rise. Crypto has been on a decades-long journey to find its killer application. It's been found, and now it's being acknowledged by the wider society: Prediction Markets The power comes from creating markets where the self-interested objectives of searching for upside produce positive externalities in the form of reliable information. If you make those markets competitive enough, you can trust the bottom-line to reasonably correlate with reality Prediction Markets work great ...
Network Goods InstituteEpistocracy
How Markets Can Reward Being Wrong
Network Goods InstituteWhy decline VC?
Recently, Volky and I made the fairly difficult choice not to accept the 1.2m funding offer that BlueYard made. What I hope to very briefly do is to communicate why VC isn't the funding path we'll be pursuing. Long story short, we feel that because of the particular thing we’re building, there are options for how to fund ourselves and make us sustainable that are better incentive aligned and more true to our values.What are we building?With the Network Goods Institute, Volky and I are interes...
Hey Kialo community,
I'm Connor, and like many of you, I've spent years using Kialo to map arguments and explore complex questions. You can see my profile here if you're curious about my history with the platform.
I wanted to share a project I've been building that was partially inspire d by Kialo: Negation Game. It's designed to preserve what we love about Kialo — critical thinking, collaborative truth-finding, and genuine engagement with opposing views — while exploring some different structural approaches.
1. Relevance and truth-value are separate dimensions
You know that longstanding discussion about whether Kialo should separate impact voting into relevance and veracity? Negation Game treats these as distinct from the ground up. You can debate whether a claim is relevant to the discussion, not just whether it's true.
2. Graph-based canvas with real-time multiplayer
Rather than a tree structure, Negation Game uses a flexible canvas where you can spatially arrange arguments and see how claims relate to each other. Multiple people can work on the same board simultaneously, making it feel more like collaborative whiteboarding.
3. Built for strategic decisions, works for philosophy
While the tool is designed with strategic decision-making in mind, it handles philosophical discussions just as well:
4. Designed to reduce moderation needs
The structure aims to create a space where critical thinking and mind-changing can flourish without requiring heavy-handed moderation.
Most of the time instead of saying "delete, this doesn't belong here" you can just add an objection explicitly saying why it doesn't belong there.
Beyond debate mapping, we're exploring how to build a full collective decision-making tool that uses market mechanisms to reveal private preferences and align groups. If you're interested in the research direction:
I'd love to hear what you think, especially from fellow Kialo users who care deeply about structured discourse and collaborative reasoning.
Hey Kialo community,
I'm Connor, and like many of you, I've spent years using Kialo to map arguments and explore complex questions. You can see my profile here if you're curious about my history with the platform.
I wanted to share a project I've been building that was partially inspire d by Kialo: Negation Game. It's designed to preserve what we love about Kialo — critical thinking, collaborative truth-finding, and genuine engagement with opposing views — while exploring some different structural approaches.
1. Relevance and truth-value are separate dimensions
You know that longstanding discussion about whether Kialo should separate impact voting into relevance and veracity? Negation Game treats these as distinct from the ground up. You can debate whether a claim is relevant to the discussion, not just whether it's true.
2. Graph-based canvas with real-time multiplayer
Rather than a tree structure, Negation Game uses a flexible canvas where you can spatially arrange arguments and see how claims relate to each other. Multiple people can work on the same board simultaneously, making it feel more like collaborative whiteboarding.
3. Built for strategic decisions, works for philosophy
While the tool is designed with strategic decision-making in mind, it handles philosophical discussions just as well:
4. Designed to reduce moderation needs
The structure aims to create a space where critical thinking and mind-changing can flourish without requiring heavy-handed moderation.
Most of the time instead of saying "delete, this doesn't belong here" you can just add an objection explicitly saying why it doesn't belong there.
Beyond debate mapping, we're exploring how to build a full collective decision-making tool that uses market mechanisms to reveal private preferences and align groups. If you're interested in the research direction:
I'd love to hear what you think, especially from fellow Kialo users who care deeply about structured discourse and collaborative reasoning.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
1 comment
Good thought whoever u are I'm a podcaster and a poet myself I do get ur idea