Subscribe to Nye's Digital Lab to receive new posts directly to your inbox.
Prof Nye's Digital Lab is a weekly blog about the creativity, the game industry, artificial intelligence, distributed computing, and everything creatives and designers might find interesting in tech.
This week I'm thinking about analogous connections and the emotional uniqueness that makes them.
There's something humbling about picking up a book that completely went over your head the first time around. When I read Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach at twenty-three, I seriously had no business being there. The book is this massive exploration of consciousness, self-reference, and how minds work, and I was waaaaaay out of my depth.
But something stuck with me even in my cloud of confusion—Hofstadter's idea about "analogous connections" and how they drive creativity.
Now, years later, I'm putting GEB back on my summer reading list. Maybe with some life experience under my belt, (and a little Claudin') I can actually flip through and mildly understand what Hofstadter was getting at. (The take away is what motivated the writing of this essay.)
Our best creative ideas come from connecting things that don't obviously belong together, and those connections are shaped by our personal experiences and emotions.
As AI is getting scary good at a lot of things, this feels like something worth thinking about—
What makes human creativity special, and how do we hold onto it?
Here's one of Hofstadter's most interesting insights: your brain can only juggle so much at once.
He says our brains have (maybe?) four channels to ingest information, which means we're constantly taking incredibly complex ideas and then boiling it down to something we can actually handle.
Think about the word "airport."
That simple word contains a ridiculous amount of information—terminals, planes, security lines, overpriced food, stressed travelers, baggage claim, that weird duty-free shop selling giant Toblerone bars. You could spend hours just thinking about airplane engines or the psychology of people rushing to catch flights. But somehow, your brain takes all that complexity and packages it into one word that everyone understands.
This isn't just about being efficient—
If we couldn't compress reality like this, we'd be paralyzed by information overload. But here's the interesting part: the way you compress and connect these ideas isn't random. It's shaped by your life experiences and emotions. "Airport" might mean adventure if you love traveling, or anxiety if you hate flying, or boredom if you've spent too many hours waiting for delayed flights.
These emotional connections create unique patterns in how you think. Could a computer algorithm ever have the impulse to connect Tsarist Russia with Pandas?—that's the kind of weird, personal connection that could only come from a human brain that's read both historical tragedy and cartoon absurdity.
Your emotional experiences create a personal map of how ideas connect to each other.
Hofstadter has this concept called the "Godelian Loop"—basically, it's when a system becomes aware of itself. He uses brain-bending sentences like ...
"This sentence no verb"
Even while trying to generate this sentence with Claude, it put the "HAS" in there!
Maybe that validates Hofstadter's point. He thinks this kind of self-awareness is what creates consciousness, and more importantly, what makes creativity possible.
To create something genuinely new, you have to be aware that you're creating it. It's sort of like being "in on your own joke."
Steve Martin was a master of this—his comedy worked because he was always aware he was performing, creating this extra layer that made even simple jokes feel sophisticated.
This self-awareness, somewhat "meta" level, is what lets you work in the spaces between different fields.
The best creative people don't necessarily dominate any single area—they excel at seeing connections others miss.
I use this all the time, but I love this quote from Matt Groening:
"Cartooning is for people who can't quite draw or can't quite write—combine the two half talents and you come up with a career."
That perfectly captures what Hofstadter is talking about.
Most of us live in these "in-between" spaces. You might not be the best writer or the best scientist or the best musician, but you're the only person who sees the world through your particular combination of interests and experiences. Your value comes from creating new connections, analogous connections, not from mastering old categories.
You become the expert on the intersection that only you can see.
When AI beat world chess champion Kasparov, Hofstadter was genuinely unsettled. It wasn't just about chess—it was about what makes human thinking special.
He was alarmed, and so should we be.
Even though Hofstadter's mind is tough to keep up with, I know he believed that human creativity comes from our emotional experience of the world. We don't just process information—we feel it. When the Twin Towers collapsed, when you watch a friend get sick, when you fall in love—these experiences don't just give you information. They actually rewire how your brain connects ideas to each other. When you have a great idea, you are emotionally moved. This is because of the emotional underpinning that drives your connections.
This emotional dimension of analogous connections - is this what AI could be missing?
Sure, AlphaGo can destroy humans at Go, and AI can write essays (without pandas), but these systems don't actually experience anything. They don't have emotional stakes in what they're doing. They can optimize and calculate, but they can't make the kind of deeply personal, weird connections that drive human creativity. This is still me piloting an essay and deciding to use pandas.
Your creativity isn't just about being smart—it's about being you.
The specific combination of things you've experienced, felt, loved, and lost creates a unique pattern of connections in your mind. That's not something an algorithm can replicate, because it's not just about processing information. It's about living through experiences that change how you see everything else.
This doesn't mean AI isn't impressive or useful. But it does suggest that the most valuable human skills might be the ones that come from our messiness—our emotions, our personal histories, our ability to find meaning in unexpected places.
The challenge isn't to compete with AI at what it does best.
We're not going to out-calculate computers or out-optimize algorithms. Instead, the goal is to double down on what humans do uniquely well—making those strange, emotional, personally charged connections between ideas that seem completely unrelated until someone with the right experiences brings them together.
Our strength is in our ability to feel our way toward new ideas, to create meaning from the weird intersections of our personal experiences. The analogous connections we make aren't just intellectual exercises—they're proof that we're not just thinking machines, but conscious beings with inner lives that shape how we see the world.
That's something worth understanding better. Maybe this time around, I'll actually get what Hofstadter was trying to tell me.
Thanks for reading. If you vibe to the ideas I express, please consider subscribing and sharing with friends. We'll see you next time.
Nye Warburton is an artist and educator from Savannah, Georgia experimenting with AI in the 9th Dimension. This essay was created through improvisational passages, and fed through a N8N customized agentic system powered by Anthropic Claude.
For more information visit: https://nyewarburton.com
Reframing Crisis as Opportunity, April 13, 2025
Bear_Rabbit_Robot: Mapping AI's Latent Space, March 13, 2025
Rethinking Innovation: AI and the Problem with Objectives, December 26, 2024
Douglas Hofstadter's book is concerned directly with the nature of "maps" or links between formal systems. However, according to Hofstadter, the formal system that underlies all mental activity transcends the system that supports it. If life can grow out of the formal chemical substrate...
Profile of Douglas Hofstadter.
Douglas Hofstadter, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Gödel, Escher, Bach , thinks we've lost sight of what artificial intelligence really means. His stubborn quest to replicate the human mind.
Nye Warburton
