The newsletter fragments from Monocle, Bloomberg, CNBC, the Economist, Semafor, Newsweek, Rest of World and ArtNews from September 8-10, 2025, present a kaleidoscopic view of our contemporary moment—a time when the very foundations of democratic governance appear to be undergoing profound stress tests across multiple dimensions. These dispatches from around the globe reveal not merely discrete political or economic events, but rather interconnected manifestations of what scholars have termed the "democratic recession" (Diamond, 2015) and the emergence of what Levitsky and Ziblatt (2018) describe as "competitive authoritarianism" within ostensibly democratic frameworks.

The newsletter snippets encapsulate a world in flux, where geopolitical skirmishes, economic recalibrations, and cultural shifts intersect in ways that evoke both historical precedents and philosophical quandaries. Drawing from diverse locales—Ukraine's resilient suburbs, Japan's political upheavals, Southeast Asia's simmering border disputes, to the hyper-masculine posturing in U.S. politics—these pieces paint a portrait of a multipolar era marked by fragility and adaptation. Culturally, they reflect narratives of endurance amid adversity; economically, they underscore the tensions between globalization's promises and protectionist realities; policy-wise, they highlight the failures of diplomacy and the rise of unilateralism; and socially, they reveal deepening divides in identity, health, and environmental stewardship. Analytically, these threads interweave to suggest a global order straining under the weight of unresolved conflicts, much like the "clash of civilizations" thesis posited by Huntington (1996), yet complicated by economic interdependencies that defy neat ideological boundaries.

The newsletter’s fragments, taken together, create a layered portrait of late-liberal precarities: ordinary lives lived under the shadow of war and surveillance; states performing strength while governing through insecurity; markets and technologies reconfiguring labour and civic space; and culture (from beaches to design weeks) being both an index and instrument of inequality. These are not isolated phenomena but mutually reinforcing processes — a point the dispatches repeatedly imply and which political theory helps us to name.

Perhaps nowhere is this tension more visible than in the "Gen Z protests" that have erupted from Nepal to France, representing what Beck (2016) would recognize as manifestations of "risk society" consciousness—young people confronting the accumulated failures of previous generations' institutional management. The Nepalese parliamentary fires and the deaths of at least 19 protesters speak to what Gramsci (1971) identified as the crisis of hegemony: "The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear" (p. 276).idea+3

These youth movements differ fundamentally from earlier protest cycles. As research demonstrates, Generation Z activists leverage digital spaces not merely as tools but as primary sites of political identity formation, creating what Castells (2015) terms "networks of outrage and hope". However, these same digital spaces become vectors for the very surveillance capitalism that Zuboff (2019) argues transforms democratic participation into commodified behavioral data, creating a paradox where the tools of resistance become mechanisms of control.bbc+2

The economic dimensions undergirding these protests reflect what Pastor and Veronesi (2020) identify as the fundamental tension between globalization's efficiency gains and its distributional consequences. Their model demonstrates how "economic growth exacerbates inequality due to heterogeneity in preferences, which generates heterogeneity in returns on capital," creating the conditions for populist backlash even in prosperous societies. This dynamic explains why protests emerge not only in economically struggling nations but in relatively wealthy countries like France, where President Macron faces his fifth prime minister in two years amid deepening political gridlock.ssrn+1

The newsletter's coverage of artificial intelligence's expanding role across sectors—from Tesla's workforce reductions to China's stablecoin experiments—reflects what Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014) identified as the "second machine age," where cognitive tasks formerly requiring human judgment become automated. Yet the ethical implications extend far beyond simple job displacement. As Goldman Sachs research suggests, while AI may displace 6-7% of the US workforce, the transition effects create temporary but significant social disruption.sogeti+1

More troubling is AI's integration into democratic processes themselves. The newsletter's mention of AI-generated fashion advertisements in China and "vibe coding" competitions signals the broader phenomenon Pasquale (2015) analyzes in "The Black Box Society"—the increasing opacity of algorithmic decision-making in domains critical to democratic life. When AI systems curate information flows, determine credit worthiness, or influence electoral targeting, they create what Lessig (2006) calls "code as law"—technological architectures that shape behavior as powerfully as formal regulations.

The simultaneous rise of disinformation campaigns and AI-powered content creation represents what Rosen (2017) terms the "epistemic crisis" of democratic societies—the breakdown of shared frameworks for determining truth. The newsletter's references to various governments restricting social media access, from Nepal to Turkey, reflect authoritarian responses to this crisis, but ones that paradoxically undermine the very democratic discourse they purport to protect.mdpi+2

The U.S.-centric snippets reveal a hyper-masculine political theater, where Democrats ape Republican "macho tactics" (McDonald-Gibson, 2025), from bench-press challenges to workout videos, in a bid to reclaim young male voters. This performative masculinity evokes Connell's (2005) concept of "hegemonic masculinity" in Masculinities, where dominance is enacted through bodily prowess, often masking policy voids. Socially, it intersects with health crises, as in the WHO's designation of semaglutide as an "essential medicine" (2025 snippet), addressing obesity's rise—a condition linked to sedentary lifestyles and inequality, per research in The Lancet (Swinburn et al., 2019). Economically, this ties to business news like China's EV dominance in Munich (2025 snippet), where subsidies fuel cutthroat competition, potentially dooming 100 brands, as BYD predicts. This mirrors Schumpeter's (1942/1976) "creative destruction" in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, where innovation disrupts markets, yet in China's case, state intervention distorts it, interrelating with global tariffs under Trump (various snippets), which weaponize trade against Russia and allies.

The economic and political realignments evident throughout the newsletter—from BRICS meetings to discuss US tariffs to China's expanding influence in Africa—reflect what Rachman (2022) describes as the "age of the strongman" and the broader shift toward what Kagan (2018) terms "the jungle grows back"—a return to great power competition after the brief unipolar moment following the Cold War.

The US imposition of 30% tariffs on South Africa while China deepens its investments across the continent illustrates what Ikenberry (2018) analyzes as the "crisis of the liberal international order." This is not merely about trade policy but about competing visions of modernity itself. The newsletter's mention of Chinese brands gaining prominence in Southeast Asia and Chinese companies pioneering stablecoin technology represents what Economy (2018) describes as China's effort to create "parallel institutions" that challenge Western-dominated economic architectures.credendo+2

Saudi Arabia's cultural diplomacy efforts—from hosting Metropolitan Opera performances to funding art residencies—reflect what Nye (2004) conceptualized as "soft power" competition, but in a multipolar rather than bipolar context. The kingdom's simultaneous courting of both US and Chinese investment demonstrates what Kupchan (2012) calls "no one's world"—a condition where multiple powers vie for influence without any single hegemon capable of imposing universal norms.

In the realm of geopolitical affairs, the newsletter's focus on Ukraine's "road to Kyiv" (Jenne, 2025) poignantly illustrates the human cost of protracted conflict, where fruit-laden trees and familial bonds persist amid drone strikes and basement shelters. This personal vignette resonates with the philosophical stoicism of Viktor Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning (1946/2006), where he argues that "everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances" (p. 66). Socially, it underscores the erosion of normalcy, with women-led defense units like the "Witches of Bucha" symbolizing a gendered shift in resistance, akin to the feminist analyses in Enloe's (2014) Bananas, Beaches and Bases, which explores how wars reshape women's roles in militarized societies. Interrelatedly, this ties to the Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire's fragility (Kennedy & Southern, 2025), where propaganda supplants gunfire, and U.S.-brokered truces falter amid landmine accusations and nationalist marches. Policy implications here are stark: The involvement of far-right media in geopolitical narratives echoes Habermas's (1989) critique of the public sphere's distortion in The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, where mediated discourse becomes a tool for manipulation rather than rational debate. Economically, such instability disrupts border trade, exacerbating poverty in regions already vulnerable, as noted in research by the World Bank (2023) on conflict-induced economic fragmentation in Southeast Asia.

Climate change threads throughout these newsletters not as a discrete policy issue but as what Beck (2009) termed a "world risk"—a challenge that transcends national boundaries and existing institutional capacities. Ethiopia's completion of the controversial Renaissance Dam, despite opposition from downstream nations, exemplifies what Eckersley (2004) analyzes as the tension between democratic sovereignty and ecological interdependence.

The broader question of whether democratic systems can respond effectively to long-term environmental threats has prompted concerning discussions of "authoritarian environmentalism"—the notion that only non-democratic systems possess the decisional capacity for rapid decarbonization (Beeson, 2010). This represents perhaps the most profound challenge to democratic theory since the rise of fascism, as it questions whether the core democratic values of pluralism, deliberation, and consent can survive contact with biophysical limits.nataliekoch+1

Underlying these political and economic dynamics are deeper questions about identity and belonging in an interconnected world. The newsletter's coverage of various cultural controversies—from British Museum debates over the Parthenon Marbles to discussions of "Blueskyism" among progressive activists—reflects what Taylor (1992) analyzed as the "politics of recognition" in multicultural societies.

The rise of what Mudde (2007) terms "populist radical right" parties across Europe and beyond represents not merely economic grievance but what Inglehart and Norris (2019) identify as "cultural backlash" against cosmopolitan values. This dynamic appears in various forms throughout the newsletter—from Hungarian resistance to EU energy policies to French political fragmentation to Japanese political instability following electoral setbacks.

Yet the cultural politics of our moment cannot be reduced to simple binaries between "globalist" and "nationalist" worldviews. As Anderson (2006) presciently observed in "Imagined Communities," national identity was always a cultural construction, and digital technologies are creating new forms of "imagined communities" that transcend territorial boundaries while sometimes reinforcing parochial identities.

Shifting to East Asian politics, Japan's "Tokyo drift" with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's resignation (Wilson, 2025) highlights internal party fractures amid electoral bruises, potentially ushering in Sanae Takaichi as the first female leader. This moment invokes Simone de Beauvoir's (1949/2011) existential feminism in The Second Sex, where she posits that women's ascension to power challenges patriarchal norms, yet often within conservative frameworks—Takaichi's "tough right-winger" stance may reinforce rather than subvert them. Culturally, it connects to the newsletter's later design focus on Helsinki Design Week (Burtsoff, 2025), a family-run event thriving amid Nordic rivals, symbolizing how cultural institutions foster community resilience. Burtsoff's emphasis on "long-term stewardship" mirrors Putnam's (2000) Bowling Alone, which laments the decline of social capital in modern societies; here, the Korkmans' multigenerational model counters bureaucratic inertia, offering a policy blueprint for cultural sustainability. Economically, these cultural exports bolster soft power, as seen in Finland's "happiest nation" branding, per the World Happiness Report (Helliwell et al., 2025), interrelating with global tourism trends amid post-pandemic recovery.

The recurring theme of governmental instability throughout the newsletters—from Japanese prime ministerial resignations to French prime ministerial turnover to Nepalese governmental collapse—reflects what Fukuyama (2014) describes as "political decay": the inability of existing institutions to adapt to changing social and economic conditions.

This institutional sclerosis appears not only in formal governmental structures but in the broader ecosystem of democratic life. The newsletter's mentions of declining faith in traditional media, the rise of alternative information sources, and the increasing polarization of public discourse reflect what Habermas (2006) warned about as the "refeudalization of the public sphere"—its fragmentation into narrow communities of shared belief rather than spaces for reasoned deliberation.

Yet amid these challenges, the newsletters also hint at potential sources of renewal. The youth movements, despite their sometimes destructive manifestations, represent what Tilly (2004) called "repertoires of contention"—new forms of political participation that may ultimately strengthen democratic responsiveness. The technological innovations that threaten democratic norms also create possibilities for enhanced participation and transparency.

The patterns evident across these newsletters suggest we may be witnessing not merely a crisis of liberal democracy but its evolution into something new—what Mudde and Kaltwasser (2017) call "illiberal democracy" or what Zakaria (2003) earlier termed "the rise of illiberal democracy." This involves the formal maintenance of electoral procedures alongside the erosion of liberal constraints on majority power.

However, this evolution need not necessarily be dystopian. As Mouffe (2005) argues in "On the Political," democratic politics always involves an element of conflict and exclusion; the liberal dream of rational consensus was perhaps always illusory. The question becomes whether new forms of democratic practice can emerge that acknowledge this agonistic dimension while maintaining commitments to pluralism and human dignity.

The global nature of contemporary challenges—from climate change to technological disruption to economic inequality—requires what Held (2010) calls "cosmopolitan democracy": institutional innovations that extend democratic accountability beyond national boundaries. The newsletter's coverage of international cooperation on various issues, from climate finance to technology standards, suggests halting movement in this direction.

Middle Eastern tensions, particularly Qatar's post-strike dilemma (Rashid, 2025), underscore policy shifts toward pragmatism over ideology, as Doha weighs expelling Hamas amid U.S. alliances. This evokes Said's (1978) Orientalism, critiquing Western interventions that reshape regional identities, here amplified by Trump's "permissive attitude." Culturally, it connects to the newsletter's art headlines, like the Bayeux Tapestry loan (2025 snippet), a diplomatic gesture amid Franco-British ties, symbolizing how cultural artifacts mediate policy disputes, per Anderson's (1983) Imagined Communities. Economically, these interrelate with Saudi investments in golf and opera (2025 snippets), using wealth to export influence, akin to Nye's (2004) soft power framework in Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics.

Broader economic narratives, from U.S. job revisions down 911,000 (2025 snippet) to Italy's beach privatization debates (Stocker, 2025), highlight inequality's persistence. The former fuels recession fears, echoing Keynes's (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, advocating stimulus amid weakening demand; the latter critiques neoliberal enclosures, per Harvey's (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, where public spaces become commodified. Socially, this links to Africa's climate summit pleas (2025 snippet), where Ruto decries broken "climate blood pacts," invoking Rawls's (1971) veil of ignorance in A Theory of Justice for equitable global policies. Interrelations abound: Conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza disrupt energy flows, per the Druzhba pipeline attacks (2025 snippet), exacerbating deflation in China and tariffs worldwide, forming a polycrisis as described by Tooze (2021) in Shutdown.

Support

The newsletters reveal democracy grappling with what scholars increasingly recognize as "Anthropocene politics"—governance in an era when human activity has become the dominant influence on climate and environment (Dryzek & Pickering, 2018). This represents a fundamental shift from the Holocene conditions under which democratic institutions originally developed.

The youth protesters burning parliaments in Nepal, the AI systems displacing human workers, the great powers fragmenting the global economy, and the climate activists demanding emergency action all reflect aspects of this deeper transformation. As Latour (2017) argues in "Facing Gaia," we are "landing on Earth" after centuries of believing in infinite progress and unlimited growth.

The question that emerges from these fragments is whether democratic institutions can adapt to these new conditions or whether, as Schmitt (2005) grimly prophesied, the exception will become the rule. The evidence suggests both dystopian and utopian possibilities. The challenge for democratic theorists and practitioners is to help shape the direction of this evolution toward greater rather than lesser human flourishing.

As Hannah Arendt (1958) observed, "Power corresponds to the human ability not just to act but to act in concert" (p. 200). The global challenges evident in these newsletters require unprecedented levels of such collective action. Whether democratic institutions can facilitate rather than frustrate such cooperation may determine not only their survival but the survival of the conditions that make human civilization possible.

Julia Jenne’s eyewitness account of Bucha (walking fields, fruit trees, the ritual of a lakeside, then the sudden arithmetic of counting drones and surviving nights in basements) insists that war is not only front-line spectacle but a reorganisation of family time, place attachment and daily rituals. The civilian choreography of listening to Telegram alerts, watching volunteer air-defence crews (“the Witches of Bucha”), and reworking migration and kinship horizons captures what scholars of social suffering call the moral labour of endurance — how ordinary people reorder values and practices to keep social life intact amid chronic risk.

This intimate register calls to mind Arendt’s insistence that political catastrophe reconstitutes the boundaries of the private and public (Arendt, 1951). We should read Jenne’s vignette as evidence that the political — the decision to wage war — permeates the private in a way that compels everyday improvisation and new solidarities.

The Cambodia–Thailand episode shows how the performance of legitimacy is mediated through curated spectacle and partisan media intermediaries. Phnom Penh’s adoption of a far-right U.S. outlet’s correspondent as a diplomatic amplifier illustrates a contemporary logic: when institutions of verification are weak or captured, the interstate contest shifts to performative arenas — pageantry, video testimony, and curated outrage — to shape both domestic nationalism and external sympathy.

Walter Benjamin’s old argument about reproducibility is instructive here: the aura of state action is now manufactured by mediated repetition and circulation (Benjamin, 1968). More prosaically, this is also a demonstration of how soft power is being outsourced to ideologically aligned media networks, producing geopolitical effects that evade classic diplomatic accountability.

France and Japan, as presented in the newsletter, reveal a different but related dimension: political instability inside democratic polities that are nonetheless central actors in global capital circuits (Bayrou’s fall in France; Ishiba’s resignation in Japan). These episodes are not mere domestic turbulence but structural signals of elites’ diminishing capacity to enact coherent policy amid polarized electorates and coalition fragility.

Gramsci’s notion of hegemony — the contingent assent that binds civil society to state arrangements — helps explain why frequent ministerial turnover corrodes policy continuity: when compromise mechanisms fail, elites rely on short-term managerial fixes rather than long-range legitimacy projects (Gramsci, 1971).

The coverage of the weak August jobs report and the market’s paradoxical buoyancy is a snapshot of a broader conjuncture: financial markets, buffeted by tech profits and AI narratives, decouple increasingly from mass labour conditions. This decoupling — capital’s ability to leap ahead even as employment softens — is a structural feature of late capitalism that scholars such as Harvey and Piketty have linked to financialisation and growing capital concentration (Harvey, 2005; Piketty, 2014).

The political consequence is twofold. First, central banks are pressured into ad hoc, technical remedies (rate cuts, forward guidance) that paper over distributional tensions without addressing structural unemployment or labour bargaining power. Second, narratives of technological salvation (AI as productivity engine) risk naturalising job loss as innovation’s necessary cost — a moral fantasy that legitimates inequality rather than redresses it.

The small but revealing piece on Italy’s beaches — public shorelines captured by private concessionaires — is emblematic: public commons are monetised, aestheticised and rationed. This is not merely about tourism revenue; it is about the normative ordering of access and the production of exclusivity through cultural consumption.

Bourdieu’s analysis of taste clarifies how cultural goods become mechanisms of social distinction: the privatized “right to the sea” is enforced not only through law but through the symbolic economy of leisure and display (Bourdieu, 1984). In policy terms, debates over “public right” will increasingly be terrain for broader struggles over redistribution and urban commons.

Finally, the Israeli strike in Doha — unprecedented and geopolitically loaded — signals a breakdown in the rules that protected mediating states. Qatar’s dilemma — to double down on a mediating identity or pivot pragmatically toward protectionist alignment — is a case study in how small states navigate asymmetrical coercion. The rupture has cascading effects for regional diplomacy and the architecture of conflict resolution.

Sassen’s work on global cities and strategic nodes helps us see Qatar’s role not simply as a national actor but as a node within transnational negotiation infrastructures; when the node is struck, the system’s capacity for arbitration is diminished (Sassen, 2001).

Read together, the newsletter vignettes map a world where violence, media, markets and cultural consumption are braided into a single structure of insecurity. The theoretical lens that seems most helpful is relational and dialectical: states and markets do not simply fail or succeed in isolation; they co-produce conditions in which everyday survival is itself a political practice. Addressing these convergences requires interventions that are institutional (rebuilding public verification, strengthening labour bargaining), normative (reclaiming commons), and geopolitical (protecting mediation infrastructures), not merely technical fixes.

In sum, these snippets associatively weave a tapestry of interdependence, where local resolve (Ukraine's gardens) confronts global machinations (Trump's tariffs), urging a philosophical pivot toward cosmopolitanism, as in Appiah's (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. Yet, as Camus (1942/1955) reminds in The Myth of Sisyphus, "one must imagine Sisyphus happy" (p. 123)—perhaps humanity's task is to find meaning amid these rolling boulders of conflict and change.

Subscribe

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. W.W. Norton & Company.

Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt.

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity Press.

Beck, U. (2016). The metamorphosis of the world. Polity Press.

Beeson, M. (2010). The coming of environmental authoritarianism. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 276-294.

Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans.). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1936)

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton.

Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus (J. O'Brien, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1942)

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Polity Press.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

de Beauvoir, S. (2011). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1949)

Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141-155.

Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2018). The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press.

Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. MIT Press.

Economy, E. (2018). The third revolution: Xi Jinping and the new Chinese state. Oxford University Press.

Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man's search for meaning. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1946)

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Polity Press.

Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., De Neve, J.-E., Aknin, L. B., & Wang, S. (Eds.). (2025). World happiness report 2025. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23.

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Kagan, R. (2018). The jungle grows back: America and our imperiled world. Knopf.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Kupchan, C. A. (2012). No one's world: The West, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity Press.

Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.

Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2020). Inequality aversion, populism, and the backlash against globalization. The Journal of Finance, 75(6), 2829-2874.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Rachman, G. (2022). The age of the strongman: How the cult of the leader threatens democracy around the world. Other Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Rosen, J. (2017). What are journalists for? Yale University Press.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (5th ed.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1942)

Swinburn, B. A., Kraak, V. I., Allender, S., Atkins, V. J., Baker, P. I., Bogard, J. R., Brinsden, H., Borja, A., Brug, J., Campbell, M., & Dietz, W. H. (2019). The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. The Lancet, 393(10173), 791–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8

Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton University Press.

Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768-2004. Paradigm Publishers.

Tooze, A. (2021). Shutdown: How Covid shook the world's economy. Viking.

World Bank. (2023). Conflict and fragility in Southeast Asia: Economic impacts and policy responses [Report]. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eap/publication/conflict-and-fragility-in-southeast-asia

Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. W. W. Norton.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

[Written, Researched, and Edited by Pablo Markin. Some parts of the text have been produced with the aid of Research, Perplexity, ChatGPT, OpenAI, and Grok, xAI, tools (September 15, 2025). The featured image has been generated in Canva (September 15, 2025).]

[Support the Open Culture Blog: https://ko-fi.com/theopenaccessblogs/tip.]

OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Pablo Markin (September 15, 2025). The Fractured Mirror: Navigating Democracy’s Contemporary Malaise in Everyday Life, Performance Politics, and the Political Economy of Insecurity. Open Access Blog.

Share