Share Share Share Pin

Telegram has long stood out among messaging platforms for allowing users to upload files of up to 2 gigabytes each at no cost. This decision raises questions about how the company can shoulder the enormous infrastructure costs, where the funding comes from, and whether the stored data is truly safe. With over one billion monthly active users as of 2025, Telegram’s ability to manage global-scale infrastructure places it among the largest communication platforms worldwide. Yet behind the ease experienced by users lies a complex blend of financial strategy, technical architecture, and data protection policies.

At its inception, Telegram was funded directly by its founder, Pavel Durov, who used personal wealth to keep the app free from traditional ads. As user growth accelerated, however, the demand for funding soared. Telegram turned to large-scale bond issuances, including a $1 billion round in 2021 and an additional $330 million in 2024. Bonds allowed Telegram to secure financing without handing over corporate control to outside stakeholders.

Beyond bond financing, Telegram now generates revenue from several streams. Telegram Premium, a paid subscription, offers benefits such as uploads of up to 4 gigabytes per file, exclusive stickers, and increased limits. Telegram also runs Sponsored Messages, an ad format visible only in large public channels. In addition, the platform introduced Telegram Stars, an internal virtual currency that facilitates digital transactions. Together, these streams form the financial backbone sustaining server costs and infrastructure maintenance.

This revenue model enables Telegram to provide generous upload features for free users without relying on intrusive advertising in private conversations. The approach contrasts sharply with other platforms that depend heavily on massive ad revenue to cover operational expenses.

Technically, Telegram’s large-file upload system runs on a centralized cloud infrastructure distributed across global data centers. When a user uploads a large file, it is not stored fully on the device but in Telegram’s servers. The app only keeps a small local cache for faster access, while the full file is available in the cloud for seamless retrieval across devices.

This design enables smooth synchronization and cross-device accessibility. Whether a user switches phones or logs in on a desktop, files remain accessible because they are stored in Telegram’s cloud. This sets Telegram apart from peer-to-peer messaging apps or platforms limited to local storage.

On the backend, Telegram balances demand with distributed servers and bandwidth optimization. Frequently accessed files are cached closer to user locations, reducing latency. Such infrastructure naturally requires storage in the scale of exabytes, though Telegram has not disclosed official figures for its global capacity.

Another major concern revolves around data safety. Telegram does offer encryption, but it is important to note that only Secret Chats are fully end-to-end encrypted. Regular chats and uploaded files are protected with client-server encryption, meaning files are encrypted in transit and then stored on Telegram servers.

In practice, this implies Telegram could theoretically access user content stored on its servers. The company, however, has repeatedly stated that it has never disclosed a byte of user data to third parties, and it maintains transparency reports on government data requests.

For users seeking maximum privacy, Secret Chats remain the safest option. These ensure that files and messages can only be read by the sender and recipient, with no server-level access. Still, Telegram’s cloud model represents a trade-off: the convenience of multi-device access comes with a less stringent encryption model compared to fully end-to-end encrypted apps.

With more than one billion active users, Telegram’s storage needs are immense. If a significant portion of users actively take advantage of 2 gigabyte uploads, the global requirement could amount to tens of exabytes. Its infrastructure relies on strategically distributed data centers to ensure availability and speed.

Although no official numbers have been disclosed, it is clear that investments in servers, bandwidth, and data centers rank among the company’s largest expenses. Telegram must continuously balance free service offerings with financial sustainability. Revenue from subscriptions, ads, and bonds remains essential in striking this balance.

Competition further complicates the picture. WhatsApp, backed by Meta, leverages its advertising ecosystem, while Signal depends largely on donations and grants. Telegram occupies the middle ground, refusing to clutter private chats with ads while monetizing through public channels and premium services.

Telegram demonstrates that bold strategic choices can secure a unique position in the messaging landscape. By offering free 2 gigabyte uploads, it attracts new users while cementing its reputation as a platform prioritizing freedom and flexibility. Although not all communications enjoy full end-to-end encryption, Telegram works to uphold privacy through transparency policies and optional secure chat modes.

The platform’s rapid expansion and heavy infrastructure demands illustrate how a hybrid funding model can sustain large-scale services. Telegram’s future will hinge on how well it continues to balance user needs with operational costs. For readers interested in the broader debate on data security in the digital era, Olam News also covers global encryption trends and international privacy regulations.

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

Subscribe

Cloud StorageData SecuritySocial MediaTechnologyTelegram