On The Hierarchy Of CloudsOn Cities That Steer Themselves
Tracing the lines of grief, care and collective power through Mexico City’s cycling transformation
On The Hierarchy Of CloudsBefore we plant anything
A few questions to see if trust is already here
On The Hierarchy Of CloudsLife Notes 2: Losing, choosing, and moving anyway
And somewhere along the way, I stepped off the expected path (though I don’t even know if I was following it)
On the Hierarchy of Clouds is a space for exploring the structures — seen and unseen — that shape our lives. It’s about systems, governance, and the slow work of change. About how we build, break, and reimagine the institutions around us.
On The Hierarchy Of CloudsOn Cities That Steer Themselves
Tracing the lines of grief, care and collective power through Mexico City’s cycling transformation
On The Hierarchy Of CloudsBefore we plant anything
A few questions to see if trust is already here
On The Hierarchy Of CloudsLife Notes 2: Losing, choosing, and moving anyway
And somewhere along the way, I stepped off the expected path (though I don’t even know if I was following it)
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
On the Hierarchy of Clouds is a space for exploring the structures — seen and unseen — that shape our lives. It’s about systems, governance, and the slow work of change. About how we build, break, and reimagine the institutions around us.
Subscribe to On The Hierarchy Of Clouds
Subscribe to On The Hierarchy Of Clouds
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
For years I tried to fit governance into boxes that didn’t hold it.
In strategy roles, policy spaces and systems thinking work, governance often arrived as something static; rules, authorities, flowcharts, reform packages. But the more I listened to people and places navigating complexity, the more I realised governance isn’t something we design and deliver. It’s something we participate in. A living practice, a way of tending to relationships, responsibilities and possibility.
I’ve sat in rooms where the governance model was elegant but no one felt safe. Where citizen voice was collected but nothing changed. Where systems were “transformed” while frontline workers burned out in silence.
This series has been my attempt to reimagine governance not as policy but as perception.
Each piece explored a different shift in how we might see and shape power:
Governance as Storytelling — the myths that legitimise authority
Governance as Care — designing for wellbeing not control
Governance as Entanglement — working with complexity not against it
Governance Beyond the Human — attending to distributed agency in systems
This final post brings those ideas together not as a solution but as a lens. A way to notice the assumptions we carry and the possibilities we might unlock when we relate to governance differently.
Together they shape the Relational Governance Field Guide — a tool for navigating power in complexity beyond command and control.
The Four Planes of Relational Governance
These shifts form a field; a terrain of movement, not a ladder. Think of it like a weather system. Fluid. Contextual. Directional.
Each plane holds a core question and principle. The combination is not a doctrine.
From Control to Care
How might we design governance as a system of trust, repair and collective wellbeing?
Principle: Accountability should feel like restoration, not punishment.
From Story to Relationship
How might we reimagine the narratives that legitimise power and structure consent?
Principle: To govern well we must first reimagine the stories that legitimise power.
From Simplicity to Entanglement
How might we build governance that moves with complexity rather than denying it?
Principle: Design for emergence. Expect contradiction. Practise response not control.
From Human-Centred to Relational
How might we recognise and work with agency that is not human — machines, ecologies, networks?
Principle: Relational legitimacy matters more than centralised authority.
What Happens If We Don’t Shift?
We are still governing as if we live in a stable world. As if power flows from the top. As if the planet is passive. As if AI is a tool not an agent. As if the public is a problem to be managed.
But the conditions have changed.
The governance of collapse will not look like the governance of growth. And we are still clinging to the latter.
If governance cannot listen, relate and adapt, it will lose its legitimacy. And in a polycrisis age, governance without legitimacy becomes violence.
Putting the Framework to Work: Eight Practices in Action
These lenses become powerful when applied to real practices. Below are eight things that I have previously been apart of, each explored through the four planes of relational governance. Together, they offer strategic shifts in how we make decisions, build legitimacy and respond to complexity. (And also a very random assortment that just came to me as I was doing this(
Urban Planning / Civic Life
Story: Anchor design briefs in community memory, not just zoning maps
Care: Shift maintenance from contracts to local stewardship agreements
Entanglement: Replace masterplans with modular, feedback-driven design
Relational: Give standing to rivers, streets or soil as decision-making agents
Climate Adaptation
Story: Frame climate not as an external risk, but as kin and ancestral force
Care: Fund adaptation efforts that heal both ecological and social wounds
Entanglement: Combine climate modelling with local observation and seasonal cycles
Relational: Design for land, water and weather systems as co-governors
Public Services
Story: Reframe services as shared infrastructure for collective dignity
Care: Build trauma-informed, relationally attuned pathways through the system
Entanglement: Use real-time feedback to evolve services with communities
Relational: Involve staff, users and ecological actors in service governance
AI Governance
Story: Recognise algorithms as authors of narrative, not just tools
Care: Evaluate harm through a relational lens — social, emotional and environmental
Entanglement: Layer algorithm audits with lived experience panels and citizen juries
Relational: Treat AI as an agent within governance — requiring co-designed accountability
Citizen Assemblies
Story: Begin with storytelling and shared history, not position papers
Care: Embed time, care and translation to build trust and inclusion
Entanglement: Deliberate across interdependent systems, not in silos
Relational: Include proxy voices for ecologies, youth and future generations
Policy Design
Story: Use policy as a tool for reframing societal narratives
Care: Craft policies that centre restoration, not just regulation
Entanglement: Design iteratively — prototype, learn and adapt in public
Relational: Write policy in dialogue with ecosystems, communities and machines
Portfolio Funding
Story: Frame funding as long-term narrative investment, not transaction
Care: Resource slow, trust-based work and capacity-building, not just outputs
Entanglement: Manage uncertainty with diverse, emergent portfolios
Relational: Involve communities, ecologies and future-oriented impact models in decision-making
Digital Transformation
Story: Frame transformation as cultural, not just technical
Care: Build digital systems that support psychological safety and civic wellbeing
Entanglement: Use iterative cycles that respond to lived realities
Relational: Embed platforms in social, ecological and intergenerational systems
If You’re Reading This… What Now?
This isn’t a blueprint. But it can be a provocation. Here’s how to use it:
If you’re a policymaker: test your next policy against all four planes. Where is it still built for control?
If you’re a civic technologist: audit your systems for the myths they reinforce and the actors they exclude.
If you’re a funder: invest in infrastructure for imagination, relationship and repair.
If you’re a public sector leader: shift from organisational control to systemic care.
If you’re a designer or facilitator: map governance as relationships not just roles.
A Final Invitation
In the next decade, legitimacy will no longer come from authority. It will come from relationship.
Governance that cannot adapt, listen or share power will collapse.
The future will not be governed. It will be stewarded.
Governance is not a structure.
It is not a flowchart.
It is a pattern of relationship; shaped by who is heard, who is held and who is held accountable.
To govern differently, we need to relate differently.
Let’s begin there.
For years I tried to fit governance into boxes that didn’t hold it.
In strategy roles, policy spaces and systems thinking work, governance often arrived as something static; rules, authorities, flowcharts, reform packages. But the more I listened to people and places navigating complexity, the more I realised governance isn’t something we design and deliver. It’s something we participate in. A living practice, a way of tending to relationships, responsibilities and possibility.
I’ve sat in rooms where the governance model was elegant but no one felt safe. Where citizen voice was collected but nothing changed. Where systems were “transformed” while frontline workers burned out in silence.
This series has been my attempt to reimagine governance not as policy but as perception.
Each piece explored a different shift in how we might see and shape power:
Governance as Storytelling — the myths that legitimise authority
Governance as Care — designing for wellbeing not control
Governance as Entanglement — working with complexity not against it
Governance Beyond the Human — attending to distributed agency in systems
This final post brings those ideas together not as a solution but as a lens. A way to notice the assumptions we carry and the possibilities we might unlock when we relate to governance differently.
Together they shape the Relational Governance Field Guide — a tool for navigating power in complexity beyond command and control.
The Four Planes of Relational Governance
These shifts form a field; a terrain of movement, not a ladder. Think of it like a weather system. Fluid. Contextual. Directional.
Each plane holds a core question and principle. The combination is not a doctrine.
From Control to Care
How might we design governance as a system of trust, repair and collective wellbeing?
Principle: Accountability should feel like restoration, not punishment.
From Story to Relationship
How might we reimagine the narratives that legitimise power and structure consent?
Principle: To govern well we must first reimagine the stories that legitimise power.
From Simplicity to Entanglement
How might we build governance that moves with complexity rather than denying it?
Principle: Design for emergence. Expect contradiction. Practise response not control.
From Human-Centred to Relational
How might we recognise and work with agency that is not human — machines, ecologies, networks?
Principle: Relational legitimacy matters more than centralised authority.
What Happens If We Don’t Shift?
We are still governing as if we live in a stable world. As if power flows from the top. As if the planet is passive. As if AI is a tool not an agent. As if the public is a problem to be managed.
But the conditions have changed.
The governance of collapse will not look like the governance of growth. And we are still clinging to the latter.
If governance cannot listen, relate and adapt, it will lose its legitimacy. And in a polycrisis age, governance without legitimacy becomes violence.
Putting the Framework to Work: Eight Practices in Action
These lenses become powerful when applied to real practices. Below are eight things that I have previously been apart of, each explored through the four planes of relational governance. Together, they offer strategic shifts in how we make decisions, build legitimacy and respond to complexity. (And also a very random assortment that just came to me as I was doing this(
Urban Planning / Civic Life
Story: Anchor design briefs in community memory, not just zoning maps
Care: Shift maintenance from contracts to local stewardship agreements
Entanglement: Replace masterplans with modular, feedback-driven design
Relational: Give standing to rivers, streets or soil as decision-making agents
Climate Adaptation
Story: Frame climate not as an external risk, but as kin and ancestral force
Care: Fund adaptation efforts that heal both ecological and social wounds
Entanglement: Combine climate modelling with local observation and seasonal cycles
Relational: Design for land, water and weather systems as co-governors
Public Services
Story: Reframe services as shared infrastructure for collective dignity
Care: Build trauma-informed, relationally attuned pathways through the system
Entanglement: Use real-time feedback to evolve services with communities
Relational: Involve staff, users and ecological actors in service governance
AI Governance
Story: Recognise algorithms as authors of narrative, not just tools
Care: Evaluate harm through a relational lens — social, emotional and environmental
Entanglement: Layer algorithm audits with lived experience panels and citizen juries
Relational: Treat AI as an agent within governance — requiring co-designed accountability
Citizen Assemblies
Story: Begin with storytelling and shared history, not position papers
Care: Embed time, care and translation to build trust and inclusion
Entanglement: Deliberate across interdependent systems, not in silos
Relational: Include proxy voices for ecologies, youth and future generations
Policy Design
Story: Use policy as a tool for reframing societal narratives
Care: Craft policies that centre restoration, not just regulation
Entanglement: Design iteratively — prototype, learn and adapt in public
Relational: Write policy in dialogue with ecosystems, communities and machines
Portfolio Funding
Story: Frame funding as long-term narrative investment, not transaction
Care: Resource slow, trust-based work and capacity-building, not just outputs
Entanglement: Manage uncertainty with diverse, emergent portfolios
Relational: Involve communities, ecologies and future-oriented impact models in decision-making
Digital Transformation
Story: Frame transformation as cultural, not just technical
Care: Build digital systems that support psychological safety and civic wellbeing
Entanglement: Use iterative cycles that respond to lived realities
Relational: Embed platforms in social, ecological and intergenerational systems
If You’re Reading This… What Now?
This isn’t a blueprint. But it can be a provocation. Here’s how to use it:
If you’re a policymaker: test your next policy against all four planes. Where is it still built for control?
If you’re a civic technologist: audit your systems for the myths they reinforce and the actors they exclude.
If you’re a funder: invest in infrastructure for imagination, relationship and repair.
If you’re a public sector leader: shift from organisational control to systemic care.
If you’re a designer or facilitator: map governance as relationships not just roles.
A Final Invitation
In the next decade, legitimacy will no longer come from authority. It will come from relationship.
Governance that cannot adapt, listen or share power will collapse.
The future will not be governed. It will be stewarded.
Governance is not a structure.
It is not a flowchart.
It is a pattern of relationship; shaped by who is heard, who is held and who is held accountable.
To govern differently, we need to relate differently.
Let’s begin there.
No activity yet