A monolithic Ethereum stack bundles execution, consensus, data availability, and settlement into one tightly integrated chain, while a modular Ethereum stack separates these functions across specialized layers (execution rollups, consensus layer, DA layer, settlement layer).
Monolithic designs are simpler and secure but less scalable, whereas modular designs maximize flexibility, scalability, and innovation.
Aspect | Monolithic Stack | Modular Stack |
|---|---|---|
Architecture | Single-layer chain where all functions (execution, consensus, DA, settlement) are tightly coupled. | Multi-layer system where each function is handled by specialized components (e.g., rollups for execution, Ethereum L1 for settlement). |
Examples | Bitcoin, early Ethereum (pre-rollup era). | Ethereum today (with rollups like Optimism, Arbitrum, Base), Celestia (DA layer), EigenLayer (restaking). |
Scalability | Limited throughput due to all tasks being processed by the same chain. | High scalability by offloading execution to rollups and DA to specialized layers. |
Security | Strong security since all functions are unified under one consensus. | Security depends on coordination between layers; settlement layer (Ethereum L1) anchors trust. |
Flexibility | Harder to upgrade; changes require consensus across the entire chain. | Easier to innovate; layers can evolve independently (e.g., new rollup architectures). |
Cost Efficiency | Higher costs as demand grows; limited optimization. | Lower costs per transaction due to rollup compression and DA specialization. |
Interoperability | Limited cross-chain communication; siloed ecosystems. | Enhanced interoperability between rollups and modular layers. |
Developer Experience | Simpler to build on but constrained by scalability. | Richer design space; developers can choose execution environments and DA layers. |
Monolithic Ethereum (early era):
Execution, consensus, and DA were all handled by Ethereum L1.
Secure and decentralized, but gas fees skyrocketed as demand grew.
Modular Ethereum (current evolution):
Execution: Rollups (Optimism, Arbitrum, Base) handle transactions.
Consensus & Settlement: Ethereum L1 provides finality and security.
Data Availability: Emerging solutions like Celestia or EigenDA specialize in storing transaction data.
This separation allows Ethereum to scale while preserving decentralization and security.
Monolithic Risks:
Scalability bottlenecks.
High fees discourage mainstream adoption.
Limited innovation due to tightly coupled design.
Modular Risks:
Complexity: More moving parts, requiring coordination.
Security assumptions: Rollups depend on Ethereum L1 for settlement.
User experience fragmentation: Different rollups may have varying standards.
Ethereum’s roadmap (Danksharding, rollups, Proto-Danksharding via EIP-4844) is explicitly modular. This design preserves Ethereum’s role as a secure settlement layer while enabling massive scalability through rollups. It shifts Ethereum from a monolithic chain to a modular ecosystem, empowering creators and users with lower costs, faster transactions, and more flexibility.
Here’s a clear breakdown of each layer in the Monolithic vs Modular Ethereum Stack, now with descriptions and examples:
All layers are tightly coupled in one chain.
Layer | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Execution | Processes transactions and smart contracts directly on the base layer. | Ethereum L1 |
Consensus | Ensures agreement on the state of the chain via proof-of-work or proof-of-stake. | Ethereum PoW (early) |
Data Availability (DA) | Stores transaction data directly on-chain, accessible to all nodes. | Ethereum blocks |
Settlement | Finalizes and secures the state transitions and balances. | Ethereum L1 |
Each layer is specialized and decoupled.
Layer | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Execution Rollups | Handle transaction processing off-chain and post compressed data to L1. | Base, Arbitrum, Optimism |
Consensus Layer | Validates blocks and maintains network security. | Ethereum PoS |
Data Availability (DA) Layer | Publishes and stores transaction data for rollups to reference. | Celestia, EigenDA |
Settlement Layer | Provides finality and dispute resolution for rollup transactions. | Ethereum L1 |
A monolithic Ethereum stack bundles execution, consensus, data availability, and settlement into one tightly integrated chain, while a modular Ethereum stack separates these functions across specialized layers (execution rollups, consensus layer, DA layer, settlement layer).
Monolithic designs are simpler and secure but less scalable, whereas modular designs maximize flexibility, scalability, and innovation.
Aspect | Monolithic Stack | Modular Stack |
|---|---|---|
Architecture | Single-layer chain where all functions (execution, consensus, DA, settlement) are tightly coupled. | Multi-layer system where each function is handled by specialized components (e.g., rollups for execution, Ethereum L1 for settlement). |
Examples | Bitcoin, early Ethereum (pre-rollup era). | Ethereum today (with rollups like Optimism, Arbitrum, Base), Celestia (DA layer), EigenLayer (restaking). |
Scalability | Limited throughput due to all tasks being processed by the same chain. | High scalability by offloading execution to rollups and DA to specialized layers. |
Security | Strong security since all functions are unified under one consensus. | Security depends on coordination between layers; settlement layer (Ethereum L1) anchors trust. |
Flexibility | Harder to upgrade; changes require consensus across the entire chain. | Easier to innovate; layers can evolve independently (e.g., new rollup architectures). |
Cost Efficiency | Higher costs as demand grows; limited optimization. | Lower costs per transaction due to rollup compression and DA specialization. |
Interoperability | Limited cross-chain communication; siloed ecosystems. | Enhanced interoperability between rollups and modular layers. |
Developer Experience | Simpler to build on but constrained by scalability. | Richer design space; developers can choose execution environments and DA layers. |
Monolithic Ethereum (early era):
Execution, consensus, and DA were all handled by Ethereum L1.
Secure and decentralized, but gas fees skyrocketed as demand grew.
Modular Ethereum (current evolution):
Execution: Rollups (Optimism, Arbitrum, Base) handle transactions.
Consensus & Settlement: Ethereum L1 provides finality and security.
Data Availability: Emerging solutions like Celestia or EigenDA specialize in storing transaction data.
This separation allows Ethereum to scale while preserving decentralization and security.
Monolithic Risks:
Scalability bottlenecks.
High fees discourage mainstream adoption.
Limited innovation due to tightly coupled design.
Modular Risks:
Complexity: More moving parts, requiring coordination.
Security assumptions: Rollups depend on Ethereum L1 for settlement.
User experience fragmentation: Different rollups may have varying standards.
Ethereum’s roadmap (Danksharding, rollups, Proto-Danksharding via EIP-4844) is explicitly modular. This design preserves Ethereum’s role as a secure settlement layer while enabling massive scalability through rollups. It shifts Ethereum from a monolithic chain to a modular ecosystem, empowering creators and users with lower costs, faster transactions, and more flexibility.
Here’s a clear breakdown of each layer in the Monolithic vs Modular Ethereum Stack, now with descriptions and examples:
All layers are tightly coupled in one chain.
Layer | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Execution | Processes transactions and smart contracts directly on the base layer. | Ethereum L1 |
Consensus | Ensures agreement on the state of the chain via proof-of-work or proof-of-stake. | Ethereum PoW (early) |
Data Availability (DA) | Stores transaction data directly on-chain, accessible to all nodes. | Ethereum blocks |
Settlement | Finalizes and secures the state transitions and balances. | Ethereum L1 |
Each layer is specialized and decoupled.
Layer | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Execution Rollups | Handle transaction processing off-chain and post compressed data to L1. | Base, Arbitrum, Optimism |
Consensus Layer | Validates blocks and maintains network security. | Ethereum PoS |
Data Availability (DA) Layer | Publishes and stores transaction data for rollups to reference. | Celestia, EigenDA |
Settlement Layer | Provides finality and dispute resolution for rollup transactions. | Ethereum L1 |
Subscribe to Blockchain: concepts and applications
Subscribe to Blockchain: concepts and applications
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Koyah
Koyah
No comments yet