Subscribe to rm
rmTaste is a Quiet Luxury
Musings captured, sorted, in collaboration with AI. One of my favorite blogs is that of Matt Webb, the great mind behind Poem/1, the watch that tells time through poems. This isn't about the poem but about one of his latest pieces. He wrote a piece on how we've seemingly moved from designing the cool stuff we saw in Star Trek to the absurd things in Douglas Adams' "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." Part of me welcomes this, as it might mean we also venture a bit away from...
rmAgents are NPCs with Main Character Energy.
This is a collection of some loosely connected thoughts sorted, altered, transcribed with AI Only a few of us "old ones" may remember Anna from IKEA, or Clippy from the Windows 98 era—those early days of chatbots. But lately, my thoughts have been occupied by chatbots again, partly because of my fascination with Intents (the Web3 ones) and partly with generative AI. I vividly recall around 2016, when I was deeply fascinated by those bots or conversational UIs and considered them the future. I...
rmTokens == Attention
Tokens: Traceable, Tradeable, Productized AttentionThese are just early thoughts—ramblings, really. What the Hell Are Tokens, Actually? When I first stumbled onto the blockchain, there was only Bitcoin. The BTC narrative was pretty straightforward for someone like me: a decentralized payment ledger, with BTC as the currency. Simple enough. Then Ethereum showed up, and my understanding of tokens started to evolve. Initially, I saw tokens as transaction fees—a way to play the game. But then the...
>100 subscribers
rmTaste is a Quiet Luxury
Musings captured, sorted, in collaboration with AI. One of my favorite blogs is that of Matt Webb, the great mind behind Poem/1, the watch that tells time through poems. This isn't about the poem but about one of his latest pieces. He wrote a piece on how we've seemingly moved from designing the cool stuff we saw in Star Trek to the absurd things in Douglas Adams' "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." Part of me welcomes this, as it might mean we also venture a bit away from...
rmAgents are NPCs with Main Character Energy.
This is a collection of some loosely connected thoughts sorted, altered, transcribed with AI Only a few of us "old ones" may remember Anna from IKEA, or Clippy from the Windows 98 era—those early days of chatbots. But lately, my thoughts have been occupied by chatbots again, partly because of my fascination with Intents (the Web3 ones) and partly with generative AI. I vividly recall around 2016, when I was deeply fascinated by those bots or conversational UIs and considered them the future. I...
rmTokens == Attention
Tokens: Traceable, Tradeable, Productized AttentionThese are just early thoughts—ramblings, really. What the Hell Are Tokens, Actually? When I first stumbled onto the blockchain, there was only Bitcoin. The BTC narrative was pretty straightforward for someone like me: a decentralized payment ledger, with BTC as the currency. Simple enough. Then Ethereum showed up, and my understanding of tokens started to evolve. Initially, I saw tokens as transaction fees—a way to play the game. But then the...
Subscribe to rm
>100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
In my recent exploration of AI tools over the last year, I've come to this unapologetic conclusion: AI is not just an asset anymore; it's a revolution that will completely redefine creativity as we know it. We stand at a crucial inflection point where AI has the potential to unlock creative avenues previously unimaginable, and yet, we're on the brink of squandering it all in our blind pursuit of efficiency. All hail the productivity cult.
Let's face it, the current trend in AI – especially in generative domains like image creation, music, and UI design – is fixated on convenience. "Do it for me" seems to be the new mantra. While this is a testament to AI's capabilities, it's a dangerously narrow perspective. This efficiency-first approach isn't just a missed opportunity; it's a potential death knell for true creativity. As a creative professional, I urge you to do it with me, not just for me.
I'm not here to mince words: the current trajectory of AI development is stifling human creativity. Or at least, it's an easy way to pretend to be creative while outsourcing all aspects of it. We might be breeding a generation of designers who lean on AI as a crutch, rather than wielding it as a tool for expanding into a multiverse of ideas and opportunities. AI as it is now is focused on linear flows, while our job should be to disrupt this sacred timeline and open up the universe with them.
One way that works for me now is using its hallucinations, interpretations, and misunderstandings not as a bug but as the feature. Misunderstandings are the signal for creativity, not its disease. As a native German speaker navigating the nuances of multiple languages, I've witnessed firsthand how AI can both bridge and broaden the gap in understanding and interpretation. The space where our concept of language does not perfectly overlap is my favorite inspiration space.
This is where AI's true potential lies – not in churning out cookie-cutter solutions, but in sparking a firestorm of creativity through its interpretations and misinterpretations. It's time we recognize AI's role as a collaborator in the creative process, not just a facilitator. We don’t need more cookie-cutter apps that give the same thing every single time; we need randomness, to discover unknown unknowns.
Now, AI will revolutionize the creative fields to such an extent that traditional methods will soon become relics of the past. We're talking about a seismic shift, akin to the Renaissance in the art world, and if we're not careful, we'll leave creativity behind for all the drop shipping subscription models hidden behind another paywall selling productivity to hustler bros.
It's high time we prioritize exploration and creativity over speed and efficiency in our use of AI. Let's not be the generation that used a diamond to cut glass.
To the naysayers who argue that efficiency is king, I say this: Efficiency without creativity is a race to mediocrity. AI is our chance to break the mold, not reinforce it. And to those who fear AI will replace human creativity, remember this: AI is a tool, and like any tool, its impact depends on how we wield it.
Here is my favorite video on Randomness from an interview with the great artist Vera Molnar.
Kids, if anyone ever questions your "computer art" please point them to what 95 year old #VeraMolnar has to say about that.
In my recent exploration of AI tools over the last year, I've come to this unapologetic conclusion: AI is not just an asset anymore; it's a revolution that will completely redefine creativity as we know it. We stand at a crucial inflection point where AI has the potential to unlock creative avenues previously unimaginable, and yet, we're on the brink of squandering it all in our blind pursuit of efficiency. All hail the productivity cult.
Let's face it, the current trend in AI – especially in generative domains like image creation, music, and UI design – is fixated on convenience. "Do it for me" seems to be the new mantra. While this is a testament to AI's capabilities, it's a dangerously narrow perspective. This efficiency-first approach isn't just a missed opportunity; it's a potential death knell for true creativity. As a creative professional, I urge you to do it with me, not just for me.
I'm not here to mince words: the current trajectory of AI development is stifling human creativity. Or at least, it's an easy way to pretend to be creative while outsourcing all aspects of it. We might be breeding a generation of designers who lean on AI as a crutch, rather than wielding it as a tool for expanding into a multiverse of ideas and opportunities. AI as it is now is focused on linear flows, while our job should be to disrupt this sacred timeline and open up the universe with them.
One way that works for me now is using its hallucinations, interpretations, and misunderstandings not as a bug but as the feature. Misunderstandings are the signal for creativity, not its disease. As a native German speaker navigating the nuances of multiple languages, I've witnessed firsthand how AI can both bridge and broaden the gap in understanding and interpretation. The space where our concept of language does not perfectly overlap is my favorite inspiration space.
This is where AI's true potential lies – not in churning out cookie-cutter solutions, but in sparking a firestorm of creativity through its interpretations and misinterpretations. It's time we recognize AI's role as a collaborator in the creative process, not just a facilitator. We don’t need more cookie-cutter apps that give the same thing every single time; we need randomness, to discover unknown unknowns.
Now, AI will revolutionize the creative fields to such an extent that traditional methods will soon become relics of the past. We're talking about a seismic shift, akin to the Renaissance in the art world, and if we're not careful, we'll leave creativity behind for all the drop shipping subscription models hidden behind another paywall selling productivity to hustler bros.
It's high time we prioritize exploration and creativity over speed and efficiency in our use of AI. Let's not be the generation that used a diamond to cut glass.
To the naysayers who argue that efficiency is king, I say this: Efficiency without creativity is a race to mediocrity. AI is our chance to break the mold, not reinforce it. And to those who fear AI will replace human creativity, remember this: AI is a tool, and like any tool, its impact depends on how we wield it.
Here is my favorite video on Randomness from an interview with the great artist Vera Molnar.
Kids, if anyone ever questions your "computer art" please point them to what 95 year old #VeraMolnar has to say about that.
No comments yet