Subscribe to Rohit Malekar
Rohit MalekarBlockchain for Public Goods - A Prequel to the Book Greenpilled
IntroductionI wrote this article an attempt for a prequel to the book Greenpilled. The book by Kevin Owocki is “designed to teach the ethos & game theoretic concepts behind regenerative cryptoeconomics to the next generation of dreamers, builders, and internet citizens”. If you are new to Web3 and Crypto, I hope this article serves as a stepping stone to then deep dive into the vision Greenpilled has to offer to sustain and thrive our public goods.What is broken?Our public goods are withering...
Rohit MalekarThe Decentralized Web and the Rise of Transparency-First Institutions
The inevitable redistribution of powerEvery generation has a seminal fight or two that define its years of existence. The memorable ones include people joining hands for the greater good in spite of individual sacrifices. The most memorable ones are rooted in defending the lines for equity and justice. As with earlier efforts in decentralization, whether its labor unions or cooperatives, the building of decentralized Web will see its chapters of resistance.It just might not look like the batt...
Rohit MalekarOpen Collective As a Decentralized Global Public Good
Exit to Community with Curve Bonded CrowdfundingThe following is a thought experiment to explore how Open Collective can Exit to Community. The goal here is to “transition from a privately owned company to a structure that allows us to share power and revenue” with its community comprising of employees, Fiscal Hosts, Collectives, funders, investors, and individual contributors. You can read about Open Collective and its pursuit to exit to the community here. This proposal is based on how Comm...
<100 subscribers
Rohit MalekarBlockchain for Public Goods - A Prequel to the Book Greenpilled
IntroductionI wrote this article an attempt for a prequel to the book Greenpilled. The book by Kevin Owocki is “designed to teach the ethos & game theoretic concepts behind regenerative cryptoeconomics to the next generation of dreamers, builders, and internet citizens”. If you are new to Web3 and Crypto, I hope this article serves as a stepping stone to then deep dive into the vision Greenpilled has to offer to sustain and thrive our public goods.What is broken?Our public goods are withering...
Rohit MalekarThe Decentralized Web and the Rise of Transparency-First Institutions
The inevitable redistribution of powerEvery generation has a seminal fight or two that define its years of existence. The memorable ones include people joining hands for the greater good in spite of individual sacrifices. The most memorable ones are rooted in defending the lines for equity and justice. As with earlier efforts in decentralization, whether its labor unions or cooperatives, the building of decentralized Web will see its chapters of resistance.It just might not look like the batt...
Rohit MalekarOpen Collective As a Decentralized Global Public Good
Exit to Community with Curve Bonded CrowdfundingThe following is a thought experiment to explore how Open Collective can Exit to Community. The goal here is to “transition from a privately owned company to a structure that allows us to share power and revenue” with its community comprising of employees, Fiscal Hosts, Collectives, funders, investors, and individual contributors. You can read about Open Collective and its pursuit to exit to the community here. This proposal is based on how Comm...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
I am convinced Web 3.0-driven decentralized communities will be fairer in more ways than any social platform of yesteryears. However, I also think that when you confer the tools to the individual to be at par with a sovereign, along with our best, our worst will amplify too.
The potential of most communities, online or otherwise, will remain unexploited until we fix a few bugs in our behaviors.
We seldom know how to disagree with people we admire or seek common ground with those we don't.
We put those on a pedestal who conform to our worldview. We destroy others with the slightest differences. It's us who desire the world to be black and white when instead it is so colorful.
One of the baggage of modern ways of consuming information is the risk of being caught in a bubble of like-minded networks. I would pay money for a curation service that monitors my existing behavior for content consumption and serves me literature that has contrary perspectives but I haven't found one.
Communities of the Web 3.0 era will bring voices with shared interests together and evenly distribute gains from the pursuit with the creators and builders of the community. On the flip side, I fear it will also add to the number of bubbles we chose to be cozy within.
Today, the onus for proverbially "crossing the aisle" to hear an opinion different than ours is still on the individual. Most sources of online engagement have created distant bubbles of like-minded groups that rarely reconcile. Web 3.0 may further accelerate this.
Critical thinking requires one to praise a worthy foe and criticize a hero when needed. But when we let go of our reasoning, allow our political (or pick any field) leaders to pander to our emotions, and break our ethical standards, we fail our systems.
Tech can't fix this.
The gradual loss of unbiased, critical, and objective thinking in human minds will be the likeliest cause of our misery, much before climate change or any other armageddon. I just hope Web 3.0 doesn't aid it. That would be a pity for such an amazing piece of technology.
I am convinced Web 3.0-driven decentralized communities will be fairer in more ways than any social platform of yesteryears. However, I also think that when you confer the tools to the individual to be at par with a sovereign, along with our best, our worst will amplify too.
The potential of most communities, online or otherwise, will remain unexploited until we fix a few bugs in our behaviors.
We seldom know how to disagree with people we admire or seek common ground with those we don't.
We put those on a pedestal who conform to our worldview. We destroy others with the slightest differences. It's us who desire the world to be black and white when instead it is so colorful.
One of the baggage of modern ways of consuming information is the risk of being caught in a bubble of like-minded networks. I would pay money for a curation service that monitors my existing behavior for content consumption and serves me literature that has contrary perspectives but I haven't found one.
Communities of the Web 3.0 era will bring voices with shared interests together and evenly distribute gains from the pursuit with the creators and builders of the community. On the flip side, I fear it will also add to the number of bubbles we chose to be cozy within.
Today, the onus for proverbially "crossing the aisle" to hear an opinion different than ours is still on the individual. Most sources of online engagement have created distant bubbles of like-minded groups that rarely reconcile. Web 3.0 may further accelerate this.
Critical thinking requires one to praise a worthy foe and criticize a hero when needed. But when we let go of our reasoning, allow our political (or pick any field) leaders to pander to our emotions, and break our ethical standards, we fail our systems.
Tech can't fix this.
The gradual loss of unbiased, critical, and objective thinking in human minds will be the likeliest cause of our misery, much before climate change or any other armageddon. I just hope Web 3.0 doesn't aid it. That would be a pity for such an amazing piece of technology.
No comments yet