
The Persistence of Dead Ideas
Most people think ideas die when they're proven wrong. After all, that's the grand narrative of intellectual progress: through the scientific method and rigorous debate, bad ideas get weeded out and good ones survive. But this ignores something fundamental about how information actually spreads through human networks. Some ideas, despite being thoroughly debunked, refuse to die. They linger, metastasize, and occasionally even thrive in the dark corners of our collective consciousness. These z...

Architecture vs. Content
Why Structure Matters More Than Words

Failure Modes of Traditional Media Distribution
How the architecture of old media failed to survive the new attention economy
<100 subscribers



The Persistence of Dead Ideas
Most people think ideas die when they're proven wrong. After all, that's the grand narrative of intellectual progress: through the scientific method and rigorous debate, bad ideas get weeded out and good ones survive. But this ignores something fundamental about how information actually spreads through human networks. Some ideas, despite being thoroughly debunked, refuse to die. They linger, metastasize, and occasionally even thrive in the dark corners of our collective consciousness. These z...

Architecture vs. Content
Why Structure Matters More Than Words

Failure Modes of Traditional Media Distribution
How the architecture of old media failed to survive the new attention economy
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Media isn’t a monolith. It isn’t a machine. It’s a living thing. Complex, adaptive, messy, self-regulating, and sometimes self-destructive. It moves like weather, not like clockwork. And that’s the first mistake a lot of people make—assuming you can control it.
You don’t control a living system. You influence it. You nudge it. You listen to it breathe and then move with it, not against it.
Media evolves. Not because someone at the top decides to flip a switch, but because millions of micro-decisions accumulate into cultural tides. A hashtag mutates. A meme jumps platforms. A comment section catches fire and suddenly a movement has a mouthpiece. It isn’t strategy; it’s emergence. A flock of birds turns midair and nobody is in charge.
And when media becomes complex adaptive, old playbooks collapse. Legacy outlets that used to set the agenda find themselves chasing it instead. Editors used to decide what mattered. Now they’re reacting to what the swarm has already deemed important. Feedback loops, not editorial meetings, drive momentum. We’ve gone from cathedral to bazaar to swarm.
This makes it harder to fake it. Manufactured consensus crumbles faster. Astroturf gets trampled under real grassroots. Not always, not everywhere, but more than before. And it’s why influence isn’t about broadcasting louder. It’s about seeding nodes, listening for uptake, adjusting in real time. Like a mycelial network, not a megaphone.
If you treat media like a machine, you end up trying to fix it with wrenches. But if it’s a garden, you learn to prune, to compost, to wait out the seasons. You plant ideas knowing they might not sprout for years. You cultivate curiosity. You stop assuming causality and start watching for patterns. It’s not about hacking the algorithm. It’s about feeding the soil.
Maybe the question isn’t "How do we win the narrative?" Maybe it’s "How do we make the soil richer so better stories can grow?"
But you didn’t hear that from me.
You felt it.
The system told you. And you adjusted. Like everything else that survives.
We don’t run your comms—we build your capability. Signalvs trains founders and teams to own their message, lead the narrative, and communicate with unshakable clarity. If that sounds like what you’re missing, we should talk.
influence@signalvs.com
Media isn’t a monolith. It isn’t a machine. It’s a living thing. Complex, adaptive, messy, self-regulating, and sometimes self-destructive. It moves like weather, not like clockwork. And that’s the first mistake a lot of people make—assuming you can control it.
You don’t control a living system. You influence it. You nudge it. You listen to it breathe and then move with it, not against it.
Media evolves. Not because someone at the top decides to flip a switch, but because millions of micro-decisions accumulate into cultural tides. A hashtag mutates. A meme jumps platforms. A comment section catches fire and suddenly a movement has a mouthpiece. It isn’t strategy; it’s emergence. A flock of birds turns midair and nobody is in charge.
And when media becomes complex adaptive, old playbooks collapse. Legacy outlets that used to set the agenda find themselves chasing it instead. Editors used to decide what mattered. Now they’re reacting to what the swarm has already deemed important. Feedback loops, not editorial meetings, drive momentum. We’ve gone from cathedral to bazaar to swarm.
This makes it harder to fake it. Manufactured consensus crumbles faster. Astroturf gets trampled under real grassroots. Not always, not everywhere, but more than before. And it’s why influence isn’t about broadcasting louder. It’s about seeding nodes, listening for uptake, adjusting in real time. Like a mycelial network, not a megaphone.
If you treat media like a machine, you end up trying to fix it with wrenches. But if it’s a garden, you learn to prune, to compost, to wait out the seasons. You plant ideas knowing they might not sprout for years. You cultivate curiosity. You stop assuming causality and start watching for patterns. It’s not about hacking the algorithm. It’s about feeding the soil.
Maybe the question isn’t "How do we win the narrative?" Maybe it’s "How do we make the soil richer so better stories can grow?"
But you didn’t hear that from me.
You felt it.
The system told you. And you adjusted. Like everything else that survives.
We don’t run your comms—we build your capability. Signalvs trains founders and teams to own their message, lead the narrative, and communicate with unshakable clarity. If that sounds like what you’re missing, we should talk.
influence@signalvs.com
Joan Westenberg
Joan Westenberg
No comments yet