In the past, the media and tools used to produce works of art (mainly paintings) were generally as follows.

Works of art were created on stone (walls), on metal (tripods etc.), on bamboo, leathernecks, cloth, silk (silk), paper etc.

The tools used to produce art are probably minerals (pigments), knives (metals), pens (pencils, brushes, brushes), etc.

The potential for a sea change in the way art will be created in the future is a sea change in the medium and tools of production (already in progress).

Digital art is a process-led external form (at this stage) and the medium is a shaped or invisible screen (impossible to determine, outside of perception, I'm afraid)

In short, the tool used to create the artwork is no longer the 'pen' in the traditional sense, but the 'pen' in the digital sense.

Then, something interesting emerges.

From the perspective of art history, will 'digital art' and 'traditional art' merge or will they remain separate?

Will 'digital art' dominate the future of human art history or will it be just a chapter?

Will "digital art" include "human art" and "AI art" (and possibly others)?

The most interesting, and perhaps the most thought-provoking, is this "AI art".

Where will she go? Where will it go? How will it be perceived by mainstream human society? I believe this is all very exciting.

And now the pfp (avatar art?) in NFT I'm afraid that pfp (head art?) in the NFT is just a brief moment in 'digital art', or a remote corner of the art world, how far it can go, whether there is a gap between it and real art, or whether pfp is art itself. These are the things that make me think about pfp art, which will certainly have its own historical place and its own extraordinary value (I am too small to discuss it for now, so I will leave it to you and me in the future).

And "digital artworks", especially "AI digital artworks", will rewrite the human (earth? Universe?) Art history will also enter a new dimension.

We do not know when such a world will arrive, nor do we know if it will arrive.

But if we think about it from this perspective, we can be sure that it has really just begun.

At the same time, another question arises: another quality of art, a sense of participation!

"Digital art" cannot and must not be merely flat.

And if it is, then "participation" must be an important quality!

Today is just a wedge, everything is just beginning.

In the past, the media and tools used to produce works of art (mainly paintings) were generally as follows.

Works of art were created on stone (walls), on metal (tripods etc.), on bamboo, leathernecks, cloth, silk (silk), paper etc.

The tools used to produce art are probably minerals (pigments), knives (metals), pens (pencils, brushes, brushes), etc.

The potential for a sea change in the way art will be created in the future is a sea change in the medium and tools of production (already in progress).

Digital art is a process-led external form (at this stage) and the medium is a shaped or invisible screen (impossible to determine, outside of perception, I'm afraid)

In short, the tool used to create the artwork is no longer the 'pen' in the traditional sense, but the 'pen' in the digital sense.

Then, something interesting emerges.

From the perspective of art history, will 'digital art' and 'traditional art' merge or will they remain separate?

Will 'digital art' dominate the future of human art history or will it be just a chapter?

Will "digital art" include "human art" and "AI art" (and possibly others)?

The most interesting, and perhaps the most thought-provoking, is this "AI art".

Where will she go? Where will it go? How will it be perceived by mainstream human society? I believe this is all very exciting.

And now the pfp (avatar art?) in NFT I'm afraid that pfp (head art?) in the NFT is just a brief moment in 'digital art', or a remote corner of the art world, how far it can go, whether there is a gap between it and real art, or whether pfp is art itself. These are the things that make me think about pfp art, which will certainly have its own historical place and its own extraordinary value (I am too small to discuss it for now, so I will leave it to you and me in the future).

And "digital artworks", especially "AI digital artworks", will rewrite the human (earth? Universe?) Art history will also enter a new dimension.

We do not know when such a world will arrive, nor do we know if it will arrive.

But if we think about it from this perspective, we can be sure that it has really just begun.

At the same time, another question arises: another quality of art, a sense of participation!

"Digital art" cannot and must not be merely flat.

And if it is, then "participation" must be an important quality!

Today is just a wedge, everything is just beginning.