

Governance in Season 8: The Next Phase
Just over three years ago, the Optimism Collective embarked on a large-scale experiment in decentralized governance. From the beginning, we’ve been committed to taking “an agile approach to governance—relentlessly iterating until we establish a system which can stand the test of time.” As we experiment, we learn more about the balance of power and other dynamics within our system, an iterative process that allows the Collective to mature and evolve (see Working Constitution). Systems that are...

Introducing the Optimism Collective
It’s time for a new chapter. As crypto enters its next wave of adoption, the calls for scalability are deafening. This demand is often answered by centralized layer-1 competitors, who abandon Ethereum’s security and values under the guise of cheap fees and a quick buck. We must not recreate Web2 incentives in our quest for Web3 scalability. Web3 offers the opportunity to rebuild the internet to align with the values of its users. Sacrificing this mission is sacrificing the purpose of crypto. ...

Answering the call: How RISC Zero and O(1) Labs are bringing ZK proofs to the OP Stack
In Season 4 of Optimism Governance, the community rallied around Collective Intents, where teams work on tightly scoped, specific initiatives known as Missions. As part of this process, the Optimism Foundation set forth Missions for critical areas of growth and development within the Collective. A key part of building towards the Technical Decentralization Intent is implementing a Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) for the OP Stack. For OP Chains in the Superchain, this is an important ingredient to ...
>1.1M subscribers
A milestone event took place during this year's Devcon – the Ethereum Interop Forum (EIF). This gathering brought together key players from across the Ethereum ecosystem who set aside competition to focus on a shared mission: making Ethereum truly interoperable.
While Ethereum competes with other ecosystems, focusing solely on outperforming competitors misses the bigger picture. Competition is healthy and natural, but right now we need to direct more of that competitive energy on creating meaningful value for users.
The participants of the EIF admitted that the true challenge – and opportunity – lies in delivering solutions that outperform both traditional financial systems like SEPA and wire transfers and existing blockchain alternatives. The goal is to deliver a World Computer that is simpler to use, faster and cheaper, and truly global in reach. This realization has sparked a powerful collaborative movement within the Ethereum community.
The collaborative and human-coordination spirit is fundamental to the Ethereum community's ability to bring diverse stakeholders together to work towards common goals. During the EIF, the community established a clear, user-centric goal: enabling asset transfers between any 2 chains in less than 3 blocks.
To put this in perspective, this means transfers would take no more than 36 seconds between the Ethereum L1 and L2s, and 6 seconds at most between L2s like OP Mainnet and Unichain.
This isn't just an arbitrary target – it's a commitment to developing shared standards that allow us to scale at capacity. To achieve this, the Ethereum Foundation, participating L2s, and wallet providers identified two key focus areas for H1 2025 that don't require major protocol changes:
Onchain configurations
Chain-specific addresses
Putting L2 chain configs onchain would create a standardized way to verify that a transaction was included in L2. The solution lies in moving the chain parameters currently hosted on chainlist.org directly onto L1. Because onchain configs include chain IDs and network parameters that light clients require for verification, wallets would be able to utilize chain configs alongside a light client to verify fund transfers, without relying on intermediaries.
Storing L2 chain configurations onchain provides several benefits:
It enables a more standardized user experience for sending transactions across the Ethereum ecosystem.
It improves wallet security by reducing reliance on infrastructure companies for transaction verification and information.
It allows for chains to bootstrap themselves more quickly by permissionlessly adding themselves to the onchain registry.
It eliminates intermediaries in defining the canonical definition of the chain.
User experience currently varies significantly across different chains and wallets. At EIF, participants discussed the need for users to transact on Ethereum simply, without having to think about which chain they're on. Chain-specific addresses offer one solution to this challenge.
Vitalik Buterin provided valuable insights on this topic in his recent overview of wallet improvements, focusing on enhancing cross-chain transaction UX. One key proposal is the implementation of chain-specific addresses in a user-friendly format. For example, an address could look like this:
0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045@optimism.eth
In a scenario where users want to deposit into a protocol, they are provided with an address in the above-presented format. They simply paste it into their wallet's "to" field and click "send." Now that the wallet knows what chain the user wants to go to, the wallet handles all cross-chain complexity, ensuring assets arrive on the intended chain. This means users can transfer assets without switching networks or using bridges.
The Ethereum Foundation is taking the lead in coordinating interoperability efforts throughout 2025, but success depends on continued collaboration across the ecosystem. Please see the simplified roadmap for a high-level view on the proposed plan for Ethereum-wide interoperability. We're already seeing progress with several ERCs and proposals in development, including:
ERC-7785 for onchain configs
ERC-7828 for chain-specific addresses
ERC-7683 for cross-chain intents
ERC-7802 for cross-chain token interface
RIP-7755 for cross-chain calls
The future of Ethereum interoperability isn't just about technical solutions – it's about our community's ability to work together. By combining our expertise and resources, we can create the seamless, user-friendly experience that will drive Ethereum forward.

A milestone event took place during this year's Devcon – the Ethereum Interop Forum (EIF). This gathering brought together key players from across the Ethereum ecosystem who set aside competition to focus on a shared mission: making Ethereum truly interoperable.
While Ethereum competes with other ecosystems, focusing solely on outperforming competitors misses the bigger picture. Competition is healthy and natural, but right now we need to direct more of that competitive energy on creating meaningful value for users.
The participants of the EIF admitted that the true challenge – and opportunity – lies in delivering solutions that outperform both traditional financial systems like SEPA and wire transfers and existing blockchain alternatives. The goal is to deliver a World Computer that is simpler to use, faster and cheaper, and truly global in reach. This realization has sparked a powerful collaborative movement within the Ethereum community.
The collaborative and human-coordination spirit is fundamental to the Ethereum community's ability to bring diverse stakeholders together to work towards common goals. During the EIF, the community established a clear, user-centric goal: enabling asset transfers between any 2 chains in less than 3 blocks.
To put this in perspective, this means transfers would take no more than 36 seconds between the Ethereum L1 and L2s, and 6 seconds at most between L2s like OP Mainnet and Unichain.
This isn't just an arbitrary target – it's a commitment to developing shared standards that allow us to scale at capacity. To achieve this, the Ethereum Foundation, participating L2s, and wallet providers identified two key focus areas for H1 2025 that don't require major protocol changes:
Onchain configurations
Chain-specific addresses
Putting L2 chain configs onchain would create a standardized way to verify that a transaction was included in L2. The solution lies in moving the chain parameters currently hosted on chainlist.org directly onto L1. Because onchain configs include chain IDs and network parameters that light clients require for verification, wallets would be able to utilize chain configs alongside a light client to verify fund transfers, without relying on intermediaries.
Storing L2 chain configurations onchain provides several benefits:
It enables a more standardized user experience for sending transactions across the Ethereum ecosystem.
It improves wallet security by reducing reliance on infrastructure companies for transaction verification and information.
It allows for chains to bootstrap themselves more quickly by permissionlessly adding themselves to the onchain registry.
It eliminates intermediaries in defining the canonical definition of the chain.
User experience currently varies significantly across different chains and wallets. At EIF, participants discussed the need for users to transact on Ethereum simply, without having to think about which chain they're on. Chain-specific addresses offer one solution to this challenge.
Vitalik Buterin provided valuable insights on this topic in his recent overview of wallet improvements, focusing on enhancing cross-chain transaction UX. One key proposal is the implementation of chain-specific addresses in a user-friendly format. For example, an address could look like this:
0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045@optimism.eth
In a scenario where users want to deposit into a protocol, they are provided with an address in the above-presented format. They simply paste it into their wallet's "to" field and click "send." Now that the wallet knows what chain the user wants to go to, the wallet handles all cross-chain complexity, ensuring assets arrive on the intended chain. This means users can transfer assets without switching networks or using bridges.
The Ethereum Foundation is taking the lead in coordinating interoperability efforts throughout 2025, but success depends on continued collaboration across the ecosystem. Please see the simplified roadmap for a high-level view on the proposed plan for Ethereum-wide interoperability. We're already seeing progress with several ERCs and proposals in development, including:
ERC-7785 for onchain configs
ERC-7828 for chain-specific addresses
ERC-7683 for cross-chain intents
ERC-7802 for cross-chain token interface
RIP-7755 for cross-chain calls
The future of Ethereum interoperability isn't just about technical solutions – it's about our community's ability to work together. By combining our expertise and resources, we can create the seamless, user-friendly experience that will drive Ethereum forward.

Governance in Season 8: The Next Phase
Just over three years ago, the Optimism Collective embarked on a large-scale experiment in decentralized governance. From the beginning, we’ve been committed to taking “an agile approach to governance—relentlessly iterating until we establish a system which can stand the test of time.” As we experiment, we learn more about the balance of power and other dynamics within our system, an iterative process that allows the Collective to mature and evolve (see Working Constitution). Systems that are...

Introducing the Optimism Collective
It’s time for a new chapter. As crypto enters its next wave of adoption, the calls for scalability are deafening. This demand is often answered by centralized layer-1 competitors, who abandon Ethereum’s security and values under the guise of cheap fees and a quick buck. We must not recreate Web2 incentives in our quest for Web3 scalability. Web3 offers the opportunity to rebuild the internet to align with the values of its users. Sacrificing this mission is sacrificing the purpose of crypto. ...

Answering the call: How RISC Zero and O(1) Labs are bringing ZK proofs to the OP Stack
In Season 4 of Optimism Governance, the community rallied around Collective Intents, where teams work on tightly scoped, specific initiatives known as Missions. As part of this process, the Optimism Foundation set forth Missions for critical areas of growth and development within the Collective. A key part of building towards the Technical Decentralization Intent is implementing a Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) for the OP Stack. For OP Chains in the Superchain, this is an important ingredient to ...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet