Here we present a simplified, concise overview of 246 Club whitepaper. It highlights how 246 Club unifies fragmented lending markets, uses lending restaking to increase yields, and manages risk through segmented exposure and dynamic liquidation rules.

246 Club is positioned to become the EigenLayer for lending and borrowing protocols. It builds on top of existing platforms (like Aave) to:

• Defragment liquidity: Brings together specialized lending pools into a more unified system.

• Offer extra yield: Lets users restake (delegate) their borrowing power to capture interest rate arbitrage opportunities.

• Manage risk: Maintains isolation of positions, apply segmented risk limits, and implement dynamic liquidation thresholds.

In essence, 246 Club streamlines how users deposit collateral and borrow across multiple protocols without leaving their original positions.

DeFi lending has grown more specialized. Each new token or yield-bearing asset spawns its own liquidity pool, interest rates, and risk parameters. This specialization:

• Fragments liquidity: Capital gets spread out across many small pools.

• Creates volatility: Small changes in supply or demand can drastically move rates.

• Introduces complexity: Users who want the best rates shuffle funds across multiple protocols, facing friction and potential risks.

Despite the benefits of specialized markets, the constant shifting of liquidity and the emergence of new pools make the landscape harder to navigate.

Whenever the same asset has different rates in different pools, interest rate arbitrage emerges:

• Cause: Fragmentation and the varied risk perceptions across pools.

• Effect: Rates remain misaligned for longer than in a perfectly efficient market.

• Opportunity: Smart money exploits these rate discrepancies, earning higher returns by allocating capital to under- or over-priced pools.

The more specialized the market becomes, the more frequent these rate gaps can appear, making arbitrage an ongoing theme in DeFi.

246 Club aims to capture and simplify arbitrage through two main ideas:

1. Cross-Protocol Loan Positions

2. Credit Stripping (with Lending Restaking)

Instead of juggling separate deposits and loans across different protocols, a user can open an atomic position that deposits collateral in one protocol (where it’s valued favorably) and borrows from another (where borrowing rates are lower). This single unified position effectively captures the net spread between those two rates, removing the need for complex, multi-protocol management.

Lending Restaking is inspired by Ethereum restaking. Here, depositors on a base protocol (e.g., Aave) continue to earn their normal yield but can delegate their borrowing power to 246 Club. Through Credit Stripping, 246 Club uses this delegated borrowing power in other protocols to earn arbitrage yields. In return:

• The original depositors maintain their base yield on Aave.

• They receive extra yield when 246 Club actively borrows against their delegated credit.

This mechanism combines the depth and stability of leading protocols (like Aave) with targeted deployments in niche markets.

Loans initiated by 246 Club on a base protocol remain isolated, so one user’s risky position doesn’t affect another’s. Each loan’s interest accrual, liquidation risk, and health factor are contained within that position.

246 Club opts for single-collateral, single-borrow setups within each pair it manages, meaning:

• No multi-collateral loops.

• Each pair has its own interest rate model, loan-to-value (LTV) limit, and liquidation rules.

This avoids cross-collateral complexity and tailors risk parameters to the assets in each pair.

Unified pools provide large liquidity, stable rates, and a network effect for lenders and borrowers. However, in a purely unified system, lenders can be exposed to collateral risks they didn’t sign up for.

Segmented Risk Exposure (SRE) retains the advantages of a single large pool (stability, deep liquidity) while allocating “slices” of that pool to different collateral types. Each collateral has its own share of the pool, preventing any one asset from monopolizing liquidity.

• Governance overhead: Protocols must decide each collateral’s allocation.

• Shared interest rates: Global utilization can still drive up rates for everyone if usage is high enough.

• Caps can lock out demand: If a collateral’s slice is fully used, new borrowing requests may go unmet.

Buffer Allocation refines SRE by adding hard and soft caps and a dynamic interest rate curve.

• Hard Caps: The absolute limit on how much a collateral can borrow from the unified pool. Beyond this, no more borrowing is permitted.

• Soft Caps: Below the hard cap. Once borrowing exceeds the soft cap, the protocol taps into a buffer, and interest rates for that collateral rise sharply.

This tiered approach allows higher-demand collaterals to keep borrowing (at a higher cost) without undermining the entire pool.

Once a collateral surpasses its soft cap, a collateral-specific premium is added to the global rate. This ensures:

• Borrowers of that in-demand collateral pay more.

• Lenders benefit from higher interest.

• Other collaterals remain mostly unaffected unless overall utilization also climbs.

Most lending protocols use a single liquidation threshold. 246 Club uses two:

1. Lower Threshold (LT1): Liquidations are partial, with a smaller bonus to liquidators.

2. Upper Threshold (LT2): Liquidations can be full, offering higher profit for liquidators.

Close Factor (CF) and Liquidation Bonus (LB) scale between LT1 and LT2, ensuring liquidation incentives adjust gradually rather than flipping abruptly.

• At LT1, smaller liquidations discourage panics and give borrowers a chance to fix undercollateralized positions.

• At LT2, liquidations become more profitable for liquidators but riskier for borrowers who fail to act in time.

246 Club streamlines how DeFi lenders and borrowers navigate an increasingly specialized lending world. Its Cross-Protocol Loan Positions and Credit Stripping mechanics let depositors earn extra yield without leaving their base positions, while Segmented Risk Exposure and Buffer Allocation guard against runaway risks and optimize capital efficiency. Finally, the Dual Liquidation Threshold framework reduces abrupt liquidations, promoting a healthier environment for both borrowers and liquidators.

By unifying diverse pools, capturing rate differences, and refining collateral allocations, 246 Club introduces a cohesive layer that promises more consistent yields for lenders, better borrowing conditions, and a robust risk management foundation across multiple protocols.

Disclaimer:
This document is for informational purposes only. It is not financial or investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. The information here may change and is not guaranteed to be complete or accurate

Here we present a simplified, concise overview of 246 Club whitepaper. It highlights how 246 Club unifies fragmented lending markets, uses lending restaking to increase yields, and manages risk through segmented exposure and dynamic liquidation rules.

246 Club is positioned to become the EigenLayer for lending and borrowing protocols. It builds on top of existing platforms (like Aave) to:

• Defragment liquidity: Brings together specialized lending pools into a more unified system.

• Offer extra yield: Lets users restake (delegate) their borrowing power to capture interest rate arbitrage opportunities.

• Manage risk: Maintains isolation of positions, apply segmented risk limits, and implement dynamic liquidation thresholds.

In essence, 246 Club streamlines how users deposit collateral and borrow across multiple protocols without leaving their original positions.

DeFi lending has grown more specialized. Each new token or yield-bearing asset spawns its own liquidity pool, interest rates, and risk parameters. This specialization:

• Fragments liquidity: Capital gets spread out across many small pools.

• Creates volatility: Small changes in supply or demand can drastically move rates.

• Introduces complexity: Users who want the best rates shuffle funds across multiple protocols, facing friction and potential risks.

Despite the benefits of specialized markets, the constant shifting of liquidity and the emergence of new pools make the landscape harder to navigate.

Whenever the same asset has different rates in different pools, interest rate arbitrage emerges:

• Cause: Fragmentation and the varied risk perceptions across pools.

• Effect: Rates remain misaligned for longer than in a perfectly efficient market.

• Opportunity: Smart money exploits these rate discrepancies, earning higher returns by allocating capital to under- or over-priced pools.

The more specialized the market becomes, the more frequent these rate gaps can appear, making arbitrage an ongoing theme in DeFi.

246 Club aims to capture and simplify arbitrage through two main ideas:

1. Cross-Protocol Loan Positions

2. Credit Stripping (with Lending Restaking)

Instead of juggling separate deposits and loans across different protocols, a user can open an atomic position that deposits collateral in one protocol (where it’s valued favorably) and borrows from another (where borrowing rates are lower). This single unified position effectively captures the net spread between those two rates, removing the need for complex, multi-protocol management.

Lending Restaking is inspired by Ethereum restaking. Here, depositors on a base protocol (e.g., Aave) continue to earn their normal yield but can delegate their borrowing power to 246 Club. Through Credit Stripping, 246 Club uses this delegated borrowing power in other protocols to earn arbitrage yields. In return:

• The original depositors maintain their base yield on Aave.

• They receive extra yield when 246 Club actively borrows against their delegated credit.

This mechanism combines the depth and stability of leading protocols (like Aave) with targeted deployments in niche markets.

Loans initiated by 246 Club on a base protocol remain isolated, so one user’s risky position doesn’t affect another’s. Each loan’s interest accrual, liquidation risk, and health factor are contained within that position.

246 Club opts for single-collateral, single-borrow setups within each pair it manages, meaning:

• No multi-collateral loops.

• Each pair has its own interest rate model, loan-to-value (LTV) limit, and liquidation rules.

This avoids cross-collateral complexity and tailors risk parameters to the assets in each pair.

Unified pools provide large liquidity, stable rates, and a network effect for lenders and borrowers. However, in a purely unified system, lenders can be exposed to collateral risks they didn’t sign up for.

Segmented Risk Exposure (SRE) retains the advantages of a single large pool (stability, deep liquidity) while allocating “slices” of that pool to different collateral types. Each collateral has its own share of the pool, preventing any one asset from monopolizing liquidity.

• Governance overhead: Protocols must decide each collateral’s allocation.

• Shared interest rates: Global utilization can still drive up rates for everyone if usage is high enough.

• Caps can lock out demand: If a collateral’s slice is fully used, new borrowing requests may go unmet.

Buffer Allocation refines SRE by adding hard and soft caps and a dynamic interest rate curve.

• Hard Caps: The absolute limit on how much a collateral can borrow from the unified pool. Beyond this, no more borrowing is permitted.

• Soft Caps: Below the hard cap. Once borrowing exceeds the soft cap, the protocol taps into a buffer, and interest rates for that collateral rise sharply.

This tiered approach allows higher-demand collaterals to keep borrowing (at a higher cost) without undermining the entire pool.

Once a collateral surpasses its soft cap, a collateral-specific premium is added to the global rate. This ensures:

• Borrowers of that in-demand collateral pay more.

• Lenders benefit from higher interest.

• Other collaterals remain mostly unaffected unless overall utilization also climbs.

Most lending protocols use a single liquidation threshold. 246 Club uses two:

1. Lower Threshold (LT1): Liquidations are partial, with a smaller bonus to liquidators.

2. Upper Threshold (LT2): Liquidations can be full, offering higher profit for liquidators.

Close Factor (CF) and Liquidation Bonus (LB) scale between LT1 and LT2, ensuring liquidation incentives adjust gradually rather than flipping abruptly.

• At LT1, smaller liquidations discourage panics and give borrowers a chance to fix undercollateralized positions.

• At LT2, liquidations become more profitable for liquidators but riskier for borrowers who fail to act in time.

246 Club streamlines how DeFi lenders and borrowers navigate an increasingly specialized lending world. Its Cross-Protocol Loan Positions and Credit Stripping mechanics let depositors earn extra yield without leaving their base positions, while Segmented Risk Exposure and Buffer Allocation guard against runaway risks and optimize capital efficiency. Finally, the Dual Liquidation Threshold framework reduces abrupt liquidations, promoting a healthier environment for both borrowers and liquidators.

By unifying diverse pools, capturing rate differences, and refining collateral allocations, 246 Club introduces a cohesive layer that promises more consistent yields for lenders, better borrowing conditions, and a robust risk management foundation across multiple protocols.

Disclaimer:
This document is for informational purposes only. It is not financial or investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. The information here may change and is not guaranteed to be complete or accurate