<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
And we are back! Active Governance issue #9.
The DAO is absolutely on fire, so many new proposals coming in everyday.
I couldn't be more excited about how Nouns is growing!
I don't believe we are as divided as some recent discussions suggest. We are strong as a community and even stronger if we stay together.
A DAO with hundreds of people involved is bound to have disagreements. But that is what pushes us forward, that's how we learn. Learn to listen, learn to be wrong and learn that it is ok for different people to have different opinions.
Maybe I'm an optimist, but I truly believe in what is being built here at Nouns (there is nothing quite like it) and I for one want to keep working towards our collective success.
This week I would like to give a special shoutout to my fellow Brazilians from the nft.brasil proposal. We have such a strong Nouns community here and it's great to see initiatives like this, celebrating our culture and further spreading the nounish vibes in Brazil. I will go into further details in my voting reasons below.
Disclaimer: These are my personal opinions based on how I believe the DAO should be using the treasury to achieve its goals. I made the decisions based first and foremost on the on-chain proposals.
I already voted for this proposal on chain due to time constraints. Below is my reasoning:
I am strongly against this proposal. Nothing has significantly changed since the DAO deliberated on this issue to warrant a resubmission looking to revert it. I believe this would set a bad precedent and we could see proposals resubmitting quickly in hopes of a different outcome.
With the DAO as busy as it is this would only hinder governance. I won't go into the arguments of this proposal as not enough time has passed for proper evaluation of the effects from the original proposal.
I appreciate necfas for coming up and presenting this prop. However there are a few issues that lean me towards voting against.
The first thing that caught my attention was that the designs weren't very appealing and a bit uninspired to be honest.
Secondly, I don't see a clear path to success. I would have liked to see more information regarding marketing efforts and how this would help proliferate the meme in a meaningful way.
Like many voters pointed out there isn't anything that stands out for the DAO to fund a clothing brand using cc0 assets.
Giving a similar example, Nouns wipes have a strong marketing plan and a clear path to reach a different kind of audience. That's more out of the box and in my eyes makes more sense for the DAO to finance.
Me and some friends recently released our entry for the Nouns video contest and our main character is a Pizzaman! How could I possibly not support this proposal! (youtu.be/lCgNT_B2mMA)
This is a great way to proliferate Nouns IRL in a fun way. The team is experienced and the ask is very fair. Let's do it!
Extremely happy to see this proposal on chain! We have a very strong Nouns community in Brazil. This proposal is an important step toward strengthening that. Not only will this event celebrate all that has been done here already, but it will introduce Nouns to a whole lot of people.
I would argue this proposal is not just about sponsoring an event. The ripple effect that will come from these activations are far larger. The exposure that we will get from the street gallery and the event itself are invaluable. It is the kind of exposure we want to have here in Brazil, it's the kind that will inspire innovative and nounish ideas.
The ask is very fair given the great value. The builders involved have a proven track record and I know they will deliver beyond expectations. Hell yes.
Interesting to see this proposal back on chain and I must say this is a much better version of it.
Honestly, my opinion has completely changed on this, to the point that I now think it's a great idea!
Renting the countertop space is a good marketing move, we'll certainly see a lot of impulse buys. I like the fact that we should be getting exposure to all kinds of different people, maybe it can lead to some novel things.
I am also satisfied with the financials proposed, especially the fact that it will be self-sufficient after selling out the first batch. Interested to see where this leads.
Voting for design (A)
I would have liked to see more details on this proposal. It lacks specifics on marketing, distribution and costs.
That being said I believe this is a great addition to the worldbuilding of Nouns. It adds to the lore, which is something that we desperately need more of.
The proposer has a proven track record in building for Nouns and I believe in his vision.
I have only good things to say about the team over @nounish. They have created awesome content for Nouns and are having a huge impact in terms of proliferation.
Not only have we seen great engagement on the productions themselves, but the videos have also been continually used as a tool by other creators.
While the budget is extremely high, I believe it is imperative to keep funding the content @nounish is producing at this point in time.
Hopefully they can carve a path towards more sustainability since in the future it might not be financially viable to fund this initiative every 6 months.
Looks like I'm not getting a break anytime soon 😆. Plenty of proposals already up on chain! We'll be back with more governance very soon.
Feel free to follow up on twitter @lep0327. Til next time.
⌐◨-◨
And we are back! Active Governance issue #9.
The DAO is absolutely on fire, so many new proposals coming in everyday.
I couldn't be more excited about how Nouns is growing!
I don't believe we are as divided as some recent discussions suggest. We are strong as a community and even stronger if we stay together.
A DAO with hundreds of people involved is bound to have disagreements. But that is what pushes us forward, that's how we learn. Learn to listen, learn to be wrong and learn that it is ok for different people to have different opinions.
Maybe I'm an optimist, but I truly believe in what is being built here at Nouns (there is nothing quite like it) and I for one want to keep working towards our collective success.
This week I would like to give a special shoutout to my fellow Brazilians from the nft.brasil proposal. We have such a strong Nouns community here and it's great to see initiatives like this, celebrating our culture and further spreading the nounish vibes in Brazil. I will go into further details in my voting reasons below.
Disclaimer: These are my personal opinions based on how I believe the DAO should be using the treasury to achieve its goals. I made the decisions based first and foremost on the on-chain proposals.
I already voted for this proposal on chain due to time constraints. Below is my reasoning:
I am strongly against this proposal. Nothing has significantly changed since the DAO deliberated on this issue to warrant a resubmission looking to revert it. I believe this would set a bad precedent and we could see proposals resubmitting quickly in hopes of a different outcome.
With the DAO as busy as it is this would only hinder governance. I won't go into the arguments of this proposal as not enough time has passed for proper evaluation of the effects from the original proposal.
I appreciate necfas for coming up and presenting this prop. However there are a few issues that lean me towards voting against.
The first thing that caught my attention was that the designs weren't very appealing and a bit uninspired to be honest.
Secondly, I don't see a clear path to success. I would have liked to see more information regarding marketing efforts and how this would help proliferate the meme in a meaningful way.
Like many voters pointed out there isn't anything that stands out for the DAO to fund a clothing brand using cc0 assets.
Giving a similar example, Nouns wipes have a strong marketing plan and a clear path to reach a different kind of audience. That's more out of the box and in my eyes makes more sense for the DAO to finance.
Me and some friends recently released our entry for the Nouns video contest and our main character is a Pizzaman! How could I possibly not support this proposal! (youtu.be/lCgNT_B2mMA)
This is a great way to proliferate Nouns IRL in a fun way. The team is experienced and the ask is very fair. Let's do it!
Extremely happy to see this proposal on chain! We have a very strong Nouns community in Brazil. This proposal is an important step toward strengthening that. Not only will this event celebrate all that has been done here already, but it will introduce Nouns to a whole lot of people.
I would argue this proposal is not just about sponsoring an event. The ripple effect that will come from these activations are far larger. The exposure that we will get from the street gallery and the event itself are invaluable. It is the kind of exposure we want to have here in Brazil, it's the kind that will inspire innovative and nounish ideas.
The ask is very fair given the great value. The builders involved have a proven track record and I know they will deliver beyond expectations. Hell yes.
Interesting to see this proposal back on chain and I must say this is a much better version of it.
Honestly, my opinion has completely changed on this, to the point that I now think it's a great idea!
Renting the countertop space is a good marketing move, we'll certainly see a lot of impulse buys. I like the fact that we should be getting exposure to all kinds of different people, maybe it can lead to some novel things.
I am also satisfied with the financials proposed, especially the fact that it will be self-sufficient after selling out the first batch. Interested to see where this leads.
Voting for design (A)
I would have liked to see more details on this proposal. It lacks specifics on marketing, distribution and costs.
That being said I believe this is a great addition to the worldbuilding of Nouns. It adds to the lore, which is something that we desperately need more of.
The proposer has a proven track record in building for Nouns and I believe in his vision.
I have only good things to say about the team over @nounish. They have created awesome content for Nouns and are having a huge impact in terms of proliferation.
Not only have we seen great engagement on the productions themselves, but the videos have also been continually used as a tool by other creators.
While the budget is extremely high, I believe it is imperative to keep funding the content @nounish is producing at this point in time.
Hopefully they can carve a path towards more sustainability since in the future it might not be financially viable to fund this initiative every 6 months.
Looks like I'm not getting a break anytime soon 😆. Plenty of proposals already up on chain! We'll be back with more governance very soon.
Feel free to follow up on twitter @lep0327. Til next time.
⌐◨-◨


TheBower
TheBower
Hi there, than you for your vote for our minifigures, I sent you a DM on twitter but might as well ad it here: last week i set up a doc with answers to yours adn a few others but had some personal family issues with a dying cat so things got away from me, Here is the link, we will add to it as the week passes just to keep everyone informed where possible https://hackmd.io/@bigshot/S1BTk2yS3
New Prop from Nouns #289: retain nounish for 6 months ⌐◨-◨ Funding by vote.noun40.eth Reply here and it will auto pop up in the proposal comment section! https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289
0xhindsight.eth voted Against with 1 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: Reasons posted here: https://twitter.com/0Hindsight/status/1657856004762025990 tl:dr - Continued spend on content at the rate of $2m annualised does not make sense if people are not seeing it,... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x104a25
0xD...4Bf voted Against with 18 votes on Nouns #289. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x643a50
0xE...911 voted Against with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: I like the work Nounish is doing, but it seems like the only people consuming the content are people who already know about Nouns. Ultimately, proliferation means we need to reach new people. The co... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x575b08
@worthalter voted Against with 45 votes on Nouns #289. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x85fc33
nounburger.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: I am one who believes Nounish play a key part in the success of the DAO. Most of us agree that the content produced thus far in season one is exceptional. We have a world-class media company capturi... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x837937
thebower.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: Taken from my newsletter https://paragraph.xyz/@thebower/nouns-dao-active-governance-9 I have only good things to say about the team over @!9560. They have created awesome content for Nouns and are... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x198031
@ccarella.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: Investing in high quality content is super valuable for the DAO and Season 1’s work is exceptional. I believe there are efficiencies in extending this team’s work as they deeply understand Nouns and ... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x66373d
krel.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: Lets get the potential objections out of the way first -- I get it, its a large price tag and the retainer model can be an awkward fit for a dao doing its best to decentralize every aspect of itself. Bu... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x769eeb
snax.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #289. Reason: Seems nounish (it's in the name) https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x5133ca
0x8...6bA voted Against with 9 votes on Nouns #289. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/289/vote/0x6de21e
New Prop from Nouns #287: NOUNISH FRIENDS mini-figures Funding by noun12.eth Reply here and it will auto pop up in the proposal comment section! https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287
0x7...B5C voted Against with 16 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0xbd7a3e
@ohgosh voted Against with 1 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x02f7c7
krel.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. Reason: Trusting David Horvath https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x38b0b0
@ccarella.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. Reason: High quality physical artifacts that celebrate our infinite artwork is a differentiator in regards to what this DAO can achieve. Bigshot Toyworks makes great stuff, Klim loves Nouns and these toys are fu... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x64400a
necfas.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. Reason: voting in favor. klim's track record gives assurance about the potential quality of these toys. they're a unique opportunity for the nouns community. expecting a high-quality outcome given klim's skill... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0xd961b6
0xD...4Bf voted Against with 18 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x538f81
@worthalter voted For with 45 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x0efc36
timpers.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0xce45ac
thebower.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. Reason: Taken from my newsletter https://paragraph.xyz/@thebower/nouns-dao-active-governance-9 I would have liked to see more details on this proposal. It lacks specifics on marketing, distribution and costs... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0xb60e7f
coralorca.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #287. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/287/vote/0x945c2e
New Prop from Nouns #286: Nouns Wet Wipes V2 - Vote for your favourite Design!!! Funding by 0x4...919 Reply here and it will auto pop up in the proposal comment section! https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286
seneca.eth voted For with 3 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: "A thoughtful token to be given out during events." nothing more nounish than handing out wet wipes at crypto events. fun project, solid plan, great product - "i am strongly FOR this" I vote for desi... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0x587352
0xhindsight.eth voted For with 1 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: You might call me fiscally conservative....but you will never call me unhygienic! Design C https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0xb37c9b
@indexcard.eth voted For with 1 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: https://youtu.be/QmA405FpxqY A https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0xbb660c
0x7...B5C voted Against with 16 votes on Nouns #286. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0x55f0ed
@ohgosh voted For with 1 votes on Nouns #286. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0xf69e82
coralorca.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: Fun, slightly absurd, yet useful - it promotes brand ubiquity and elicits a 'WTF' reaction. I love design C and would like to see it for different nouns if possible. https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0xf1f9d0
krel.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: Lots of fun designs! C https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0x8e380a
@ccarella.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: C. This team responded in a very Nounish way. As a dadlegate I can’t tell you how many times I’ve wanted wet wipes since voting Against the previous prop. When an infinite artwork can spawn slightly... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0xa2f8cc
necfas.eth voted For with 2 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: voting for design A. love how out-of-the-box and original this feels, kudos to the proposers. this is, imo, very memeable and could be referenced along the lines of 'nouns funds everything from 3000 pr... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0x0e4f23
@toadyhawk.eth voted For with 1 votes on Nouns #286. Reason: Wet wipes are the new moonbeans. Thanks to the proposers for iterating and coming back, looking forward to seeing these come to market. It was very hard to choose a design (good problem to have), bu... https://alphacaster.xyz/dao/nouns/prop/286/vote/0x5bb3d3