The Efficient DAO Paradox
Traditional corporations benefit from a strict hierarchy with well-defined responsibilities. The corporate structure is the product of hundreds of ye...
Thesis 2024: Decentralized Social
The second article in our Thesis 2024 series. Freedom of expression is a human right and now decentralized social is pushing back against Big Tech's attempts to quash it.
Incumbents vs. History
Big Tech is driving the current AI revolution, but history hasn't favored existing superpowers to survive innovation cycles. Let's discuss polythaism - a world built on a multitude of language models.
<100 subscribers
The Efficient DAO Paradox
Traditional corporations benefit from a strict hierarchy with well-defined responsibilities. The corporate structure is the product of hundreds of ye...
Thesis 2024: Decentralized Social
The second article in our Thesis 2024 series. Freedom of expression is a human right and now decentralized social is pushing back against Big Tech's attempts to quash it.
Incumbents vs. History
Big Tech is driving the current AI revolution, but history hasn't favored existing superpowers to survive innovation cycles. Let's discuss polythaism - a world built on a multitude of language models.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog

Arthur Hayes, in his recent Massa article, touched on the dichotomy between AI taking over the world or freeing humanity to pursue new interests.
But, what if the enslavement was both, and simply compliance through convenience instead?
In Huxley’s Brave New World, there is a subsection of people that are ostracized from ‘civilized’ society. One member, John, grows up only with access to the complete works of Shakespeare. This creates a dominant, and limiting, frame for his worldview.

Leaning on AI to hack productivity is smart, assuming that it doesn’t come at the detriment of basic personal development. Relying on AI as a crutch isn’t progress.
We’ve spoken before about being Bullish on Humanness - and this is reflected in the content quality spewing out on social media, particularly Twitter and LinkedIn. AI-derived production is rife and it's making digital social spaces increasingly hard to navigate.
It’s clear that there’s no escaping the mental sweat.

An area that we’ve been researching heavily in recent weeks is DeSoc and on-chain reputation.
Attestation-based systems, that are driven solely by verification, have the potential to upturn flaws in algorithm-centric approaches. A circular ecosystem where verified content creators battle it out for approval by verified community members could work to refine the quality and relevance of content that we are exposed to. Not to mention, create safer social spaces.
In short: the potential to engineer engagement, game algorithm rankings for exposure, and manipulate audiences could wash away. Leaving scams, shills, and pseudo-influencers scrambling.

Arthur Hayes, in his recent Massa article, touched on the dichotomy between AI taking over the world or freeing humanity to pursue new interests.
But, what if the enslavement was both, and simply compliance through convenience instead?
In Huxley’s Brave New World, there is a subsection of people that are ostracized from ‘civilized’ society. One member, John, grows up only with access to the complete works of Shakespeare. This creates a dominant, and limiting, frame for his worldview.

Leaning on AI to hack productivity is smart, assuming that it doesn’t come at the detriment of basic personal development. Relying on AI as a crutch isn’t progress.
We’ve spoken before about being Bullish on Humanness - and this is reflected in the content quality spewing out on social media, particularly Twitter and LinkedIn. AI-derived production is rife and it's making digital social spaces increasingly hard to navigate.
It’s clear that there’s no escaping the mental sweat.

An area that we’ve been researching heavily in recent weeks is DeSoc and on-chain reputation.
Attestation-based systems, that are driven solely by verification, have the potential to upturn flaws in algorithm-centric approaches. A circular ecosystem where verified content creators battle it out for approval by verified community members could work to refine the quality and relevance of content that we are exposed to. Not to mention, create safer social spaces.
In short: the potential to engineer engagement, game algorithm rankings for exposure, and manipulate audiences could wash away. Leaving scams, shills, and pseudo-influencers scrambling.
The Tinkering Society
The Tinkering Society
No comments yet