Andreas Kalcker has proposed one of the most contentious theories surrounding chlorine dioxide (CDS): its ability to eliminate parasites that he and some alternative health proponents falsely link to conditions like autism. According to Kalcker, intestinal parasites and other pathogenic organisms release neurotoxins that disrupt neurological function, particularly in children, and CDS—as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent—can eradicate these invaders through oxidative action.

Kalcker’s hypothesis suggests that parasites such as helminths or protozoa contribute to autoimmune and neurodevelopmental disorders by causing chronic inflammation, nutrient malabsorption, and toxin release. He claims that CDS, when administered orally or rectally in low doses, selectively targets these organisms by disrupting their cell membranes and metabolic pathways without harming human tissues. This, he argues, can alleviate symptoms of autism, ADHD, and other conditions. He often cites anecdotal reports from parents who describe behavioral improvements in children after CDS protocols, though these accounts lack scientific validation.

The proposed mechanism relies on chlorine dioxide’s oxidative properties. Parasites, like bacteria, are thought to be vulnerable to oxidation due to their primitive antioxidant defenses. Kalcker asserts that CDS breaks down the proteins and lipids essential for parasite survival, effectively “cleansing” the digestive system and reducing the toxic burden on the body.

However, these claims are vehemently rejected by mainstream science. Major medical institutions, including the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics, emphasize that autism is a neurodevelopmental condition with genetic and environmental factors—not a parasitic infection. No reputable studies support the idea that parasites cause autism, and uncontrolled CDS use in children poses severe risks, including mucosal damage, electrolyte imbalances, and potential poisoning.

Moreover, Kalcker’s theories perpetuate harmful misinformation, diverting families from evidence-based interventions like behavioral therapy and medical support. Health authorities worldwide have issued warnings against CDS, noting its lack of efficacy for parasitic or autoimmune conditions and its potential for harm.

While the appeal of simple solutions for complex disorders is understandable, Kalcker’s parasite-autism narrative remains a dangerous oversimplification. Rigorous science, not anecdotal promises, must guide treatment choices—especially for vulnerable populations.

Andreas Kalcker has proposed one of the most contentious theories surrounding chlorine dioxide (CDS): its ability to eliminate parasites that he and some alternative health proponents falsely link to conditions like autism. According to Kalcker, intestinal parasites and other pathogenic organisms release neurotoxins that disrupt neurological function, particularly in children, and CDS—as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent—can eradicate these invaders through oxidative action.

Kalcker’s hypothesis suggests that parasites such as helminths or protozoa contribute to autoimmune and neurodevelopmental disorders by causing chronic inflammation, nutrient malabsorption, and toxin release. He claims that CDS, when administered orally or rectally in low doses, selectively targets these organisms by disrupting their cell membranes and metabolic pathways without harming human tissues. This, he argues, can alleviate symptoms of autism, ADHD, and other conditions. He often cites anecdotal reports from parents who describe behavioral improvements in children after CDS protocols, though these accounts lack scientific validation.

The proposed mechanism relies on chlorine dioxide’s oxidative properties. Parasites, like bacteria, are thought to be vulnerable to oxidation due to their primitive antioxidant defenses. Kalcker asserts that CDS breaks down the proteins and lipids essential for parasite survival, effectively “cleansing” the digestive system and reducing the toxic burden on the body.

However, these claims are vehemently rejected by mainstream science. Major medical institutions, including the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics, emphasize that autism is a neurodevelopmental condition with genetic and environmental factors—not a parasitic infection. No reputable studies support the idea that parasites cause autism, and uncontrolled CDS use in children poses severe risks, including mucosal damage, electrolyte imbalances, and potential poisoning.

Moreover, Kalcker’s theories perpetuate harmful misinformation, diverting families from evidence-based interventions like behavioral therapy and medical support. Health authorities worldwide have issued warnings against CDS, noting its lack of efficacy for parasitic or autoimmune conditions and its potential for harm.

While the appeal of simple solutions for complex disorders is understandable, Kalcker’s parasite-autism narrative remains a dangerous oversimplification. Rigorous science, not anecdotal promises, must guide treatment choices—especially for vulnerable populations.