• Expression of the Earth Changes

Is he an Islamic terrorist after all? And what about the possibility of non human involvement? In a world psyops, mass deception, and mass media manipulation, there is no easy way to make sense of events anymore without exploring multiple possibilities.

We learned that Rudakubana’s parents are Christian, not Muslim. But regardless of that, could he have been inspired by Islamic State terrorist ideology online even if he wasn’t brought up as a Muslim? I think this is possible.

Second-generation immigrants are susceptible to radicalisation. If this is the case, what should we think about the decision by the police and the Starmer government not to treat the killings as a terrorist attack or inform the public?

Scarlett Jenkinson is not classified as terrorist, but she was essentially radicalised by extreme content that she found on the dark web. Jenkinson is white and British, not an immigrant, and probably neurodivergent and psychopathic. Similarly, Axel Rudakubana - who has British nationality status - was probably also psychologically disturbed, neurodivergent, and may also have been inspired by extreme content that he found online.

This to me suggests that there is a pervasive - what I have called - ‘energetic sickness’ permeating the mental realm and effecting vulnerable, often neurodivergent individuals, usually teenagers, that is potentially demonic or alien; leading them to carry out horrific acts.

Interestingly, in his interview with Ross Coulthart on NewsNation, Lue Elizondo suggested that there might be evidence that UAP/alien beings could be interacting with and manipulating the brain states of certain human individuals.

Regardless of this broader energetic sickness or manipulation by alien entities, we should still question why Rudakubana’s crime was not treated as terrorism.

The difference between Jenkinson and her accomplice Eddie Ratcliffe’s killing of Brianna Ghey and Rudakubana’s act cannot be understated.

Rudakubana’s massacre does appear to look more like a terrorist attack because he’s a second-generation immigrant, and because he targeted a Taylor Swift themed dance party, where such events are prime targets for radical islamic terrorists, who likely inspired him. The point being that there is clearly tactical-political ideological bias as to why some crimes will be labelled as terrorist attacks and others the result of mental illness.

Beyond the fact that the Starmer regimet tried to blame the 2024 riots purely on fake news about the killer, there is a potential that immigration and Islamic radicalisation were indeed factors in what is probably a complicated picture of increasing incidents of psychopathology and terror, that can be difficult to define or categorise.

However, despite the blatant bias and ideological politicisation of killings and massacres, we must also focus on why this plague of violence and distortion - especially among young people - exists. This clearly isn’t just about immigration and Islamic terrorism (although they are factors) because it’s more complicated than that.

We should also focus on why our left-leaning, liberal, and progressive leaders are making things worse. Something is seriously wrong, and something needs to be done; but they are treating their own citizens, us, as the enemy, gaslighting the public, labelling rioters as terrorists, but not Rudakubana. What’s their agenda? And is it even human?

Matt Goodwin talks about how he predicts that the ideology of the radical-progressive elites will become even more extreme, diverging further and future away from the views and values of ordinary people over the coming decades.

This reminds me of the Hunger Games. If the Great Reset wants to turn us all into bug eating neo-serfs by 2030, then we will no doubt be hunting bigger game by then, not eating crickets! If the elites are going to depart from our human values so much, then they might as well be representing something that is fundamentally not human.

“I took an oath to the American people to defend this country from all enemies foreign and domestic, and it turns out that the enemy was elements within our own government; it was the bureaucracy.”

• Lue Elizondo

ZISE.

• Expression of the Earth Changes

Is he an Islamic terrorist after all? And what about the possibility of non human involvement? In a world psyops, mass deception, and mass media manipulation, there is no easy way to make sense of events anymore without exploring multiple possibilities.

We learned that Rudakubana’s parents are Christian, not Muslim. But regardless of that, could he have been inspired by Islamic State terrorist ideology online even if he wasn’t brought up as a Muslim? I think this is possible.

Second-generation immigrants are susceptible to radicalisation. If this is the case, what should we think about the decision by the police and the Starmer government not to treat the killings as a terrorist attack or inform the public?

Scarlett Jenkinson is not classified as terrorist, but she was essentially radicalised by extreme content that she found on the dark web. Jenkinson is white and British, not an immigrant, and probably neurodivergent and psychopathic. Similarly, Axel Rudakubana - who has British nationality status - was probably also psychologically disturbed, neurodivergent, and may also have been inspired by extreme content that he found online.

This to me suggests that there is a pervasive - what I have called - ‘energetic sickness’ permeating the mental realm and effecting vulnerable, often neurodivergent individuals, usually teenagers, that is potentially demonic or alien; leading them to carry out horrific acts.

Interestingly, in his interview with Ross Coulthart on NewsNation, Lue Elizondo suggested that there might be evidence that UAP/alien beings could be interacting with and manipulating the brain states of certain human individuals.

Regardless of this broader energetic sickness or manipulation by alien entities, we should still question why Rudakubana’s crime was not treated as terrorism.

The difference between Jenkinson and her accomplice Eddie Ratcliffe’s killing of Brianna Ghey and Rudakubana’s act cannot be understated.

Rudakubana’s massacre does appear to look more like a terrorist attack because he’s a second-generation immigrant, and because he targeted a Taylor Swift themed dance party, where such events are prime targets for radical islamic terrorists, who likely inspired him. The point being that there is clearly tactical-political ideological bias as to why some crimes will be labelled as terrorist attacks and others the result of mental illness.

Beyond the fact that the Starmer regimet tried to blame the 2024 riots purely on fake news about the killer, there is a potential that immigration and Islamic radicalisation were indeed factors in what is probably a complicated picture of increasing incidents of psychopathology and terror, that can be difficult to define or categorise.

However, despite the blatant bias and ideological politicisation of killings and massacres, we must also focus on why this plague of violence and distortion - especially among young people - exists. This clearly isn’t just about immigration and Islamic terrorism (although they are factors) because it’s more complicated than that.

We should also focus on why our left-leaning, liberal, and progressive leaders are making things worse. Something is seriously wrong, and something needs to be done; but they are treating their own citizens, us, as the enemy, gaslighting the public, labelling rioters as terrorists, but not Rudakubana. What’s their agenda? And is it even human?

Matt Goodwin talks about how he predicts that the ideology of the radical-progressive elites will become even more extreme, diverging further and future away from the views and values of ordinary people over the coming decades.

This reminds me of the Hunger Games. If the Great Reset wants to turn us all into bug eating neo-serfs by 2030, then we will no doubt be hunting bigger game by then, not eating crickets! If the elites are going to depart from our human values so much, then they might as well be representing something that is fundamentally not human.

“I took an oath to the American people to defend this country from all enemies foreign and domestic, and it turns out that the enemy was elements within our own government; it was the bureaucracy.”

• Lue Elizondo

ZISE.