When I was in my early twenties, I bought a small van with my then girlfriend and traveled across Australia free camping. I remember being struck by the plight of the native Aboriginal communities, how they couldn’t adapt to modern Western society, often ending up jobless, alcoholic, and on state benefits (Simon Reeve covers this topic in his Australia series.) But the interesting thing I noticed about my response to the natives, was that I identified with their plight much more intimately than I could understand those who I “should” identify with; the Australians of white European descent, who work normal jobs and contribute to functioning society.

I always felt deeply alienated by modernity, by society, and in my late teens and early twenties I was into anarchism, an anti-work ethic, hardcore punk, and alternative hip hop. The Aboriginal response made more sense to me than the normies who were trying to clime the corporate ladder.

The Aboriginal way of life and their deep connection to the land, which these people had developed over thousands of years had suddenly been usurped by an inherently alien, inhuman, technological system, and their inability to adapt seemed intimately real and human, so much less robotic than whatever these NPCs and wage slaves were trying to achieve.

That was in 2006, and for years after the idea never left me that perhaps all, or a majority of humanity, might eventually end up like the native Australians once the techno-capitalist system advances to a certain threshold of change.

Today, in 2026, whatever ladder people were trying to climb in the pre-2008 era is now broken, and we are fast approaching the singularity threshold. The economy is on life support, youth unemployment is on the rise, and AI is predicted to not only automate away all of the jobs that David Graeber termed bullshit, but if many experts in the field are right, much more than those — just look at the capabilities of Boston Dynamics’ latest version of the Atlas humanoid robot, and Musk’s plans for rolling out Optimus.

During the Industrial Revolution people adapted from the fields to the factories, and whilst some are making the case that the AI revolution isn’t any different, I, and the transhumanists alike, are saying that those people who can, and do adapt, will become something else; hybrid, no longer human.

In later years subsequent girlfriends began to notice something about me that needed fixing. Namely, I wasn’t a radical progressive like they were. I defended bio and gender essentialism, I thought artificial wombs were a terrible idea, I questioned vaccinations and the motives of the pharmaceutical industry. To them, this was indicative of everything that was wrong; patriarchy, outmoded traditions, unequal societal structures that favoured the “cis white male,” and a rejection of the progressive-liberal social contract. To me, their radical progressivism was leading us on a path towards human extinction.

The political/ideological divergence between the sexes has only gotten worse in recent years, and it’s not limited to the West; we see much of the same thing playing out in countries like South Korea. Men are considered to be in danger of being absorbed into a cess pool of far right radicalisation, but nobody outside of the “toxic” manosphere or the reactosphere talks about the far left-progressive radicalisation of women.

These women are not ideologically transhumanist, rather, evolutionary psychology has shaped women to adhere to the social contract much more so than men, and the result is whatever the social contract is at any given time, they conform to it — for the most part.

Women are certainly intelligent, wise, free thinking, and desiring of freedom and liberation. But as a whole, they are more susceptible to social consensus conformity, and tend to freak out when men go against it, even when those men are of high status; just look as Grime’s reaction to Musk.

More over, women (as a whole - not individually, as there are many expectations to the rule) will consistently vote against their own interests; they will support mass and illegal immigration leading toward major societal destabilisation, they will support “progressive” social advances without realising the consequences that will eventually lead to their obsolescence and mental health decline, rather than their liberation. Why, I don’t know, maybe it’s their caring matriarchal nature, maybe it’s hormonal, and explains why women and soy-males are more inclined to cultural Marxism. Ironically, and by no accident, it’s due to all of the things that the woke left deny exist and prohibit one to discuss, or maybe it’s all down to the algorithms?

Today, I identify more closely with the “NPCs” and the normies I opposed two decades ago. These are people who are trying to build lives, homes, families, afford holidays, time off with their partners and kids, whilst balancing work and providership; thats deeply human, its how we continue, its how we stay human, and things must continue this way.

If not adapting to whatever is coming down the pipeline; brain-machine interfaces and neural implants, artificial wombs, collective breeding, genetic engineering, biotech integration and nanotechnology, mixed and augmented reality interfaces, and AI-cyborgian integration, means going the way of the Australian aboriginals, then how do we step up, and reinstantiate normality whilst rejecting absorption into the alien system that is coming?

— UBI, digital IDs (which are still arriving through the back door,) social credit systems and programmable money set to cripple us into a state of neo-serdom, whilst elites build out in space. Mass surveillance and facial recognition cameras being rolled out everywhere, especially in London.

In a way, we’re already arriving at a similar plight, and although it doesn’t look exactly the same (alcohol consumption is declining for example); the loneliness epidemic, the social isolation, the mental health crisis, the job-market collapse, the rise in childlessness, the dating crisis and divergence between the sexes, puts us in an even worse position than the Aboriginals, who are at least above replacement level birth rates.

Despite my “schizo-autist coded” appearance, I’m really just a normie, a normal mammalian human-being. The “schizo-autist coded operating system” is necessary wetware for waging all out war against SETHIX. Progressive and radical liberalism and leftism is the poison, not the remedy.

The path forward is remembering what is fundamental and essential about us, things we forget, because the social contract is corrupted, poisoned, and it’s getting worse. We need to heal, and the only way that we can do that is to progress spiritually and in higher positive consciousness; the term Avatar Primitivism is strange, I’ll give it that, but it’s stuck as a label for exploring radical ideas like normal, essential human functioning, and species continuity.

If we are going to survive and continue humanity, by practicing natural births, and normal family arrangements, whilst rejecting the transhumanism and the alien hybridisation agendas, then we have to build a new social contract. If modern society keeps alienating men, then we men of integrity and spirit are sure to eventually step up, tear it all down, and build something better.

At the moment, we are nowhere near that stage, as we’re fast approaching the collapse phase.

This is planting seeds for the NextWorld, and at this point, I’m prepared to all out tear down the technosphere, who’s with me?

Xegis

When I was in my early twenties, I bought a small van with my then girlfriend and traveled across Australia free camping. I remember being struck by the plight of the native Aboriginal communities, how they couldn’t adapt to modern Western society, often ending up jobless, alcoholic, and on state benefits (Simon Reeve covers this topic in his Australia series.) But the interesting thing I noticed about my response to the natives, was that I identified with their plight much more intimately than I could understand those who I “should” identify with; the Australians of white European descent, who work normal jobs and contribute to functioning society.

I always felt deeply alienated by modernity, by society, and in my late teens and early twenties I was into anarchism, an anti-work ethic, hardcore punk, and alternative hip hop. The Aboriginal response made more sense to me than the normies who were trying to clime the corporate ladder.

The Aboriginal way of life and their deep connection to the land, which these people had developed over thousands of years had suddenly been usurped by an inherently alien, inhuman, technological system, and their inability to adapt seemed intimately real and human, so much less robotic than whatever these NPCs and wage slaves were trying to achieve.

That was in 2006, and for years after the idea never left me that perhaps all, or a majority of humanity, might eventually end up like the native Australians once the techno-capitalist system advances to a certain threshold of change.

Today, in 2026, whatever ladder people were trying to climb in the pre-2008 era is now broken, and we are fast approaching the singularity threshold. The economy is on life support, youth unemployment is on the rise, and AI is predicted to not only automate away all of the jobs that David Graeber termed bullshit, but if many experts in the field are right, much more than those — just look at the capabilities of Boston Dynamics’ latest version of the Atlas humanoid robot, and Musk’s plans for rolling out Optimus.

During the Industrial Revolution people adapted from the fields to the factories, and whilst some are making the case that the AI revolution isn’t any different, I, and the transhumanists alike, are saying that those people who can, and do adapt, will become something else; hybrid, no longer human.

In later years subsequent girlfriends began to notice something about me that needed fixing. Namely, I wasn’t a radical progressive like they were. I defended bio and gender essentialism, I thought artificial wombs were a terrible idea, I questioned vaccinations and the motives of the pharmaceutical industry. To them, this was indicative of everything that was wrong; patriarchy, outmoded traditions, unequal societal structures that favoured the “cis white male,” and a rejection of the progressive-liberal social contract. To me, their radical progressivism was leading us on a path towards human extinction.

The political/ideological divergence between the sexes has only gotten worse in recent years, and it’s not limited to the West; we see much of the same thing playing out in countries like South Korea. Men are considered to be in danger of being absorbed into a cess pool of far right radicalisation, but nobody outside of the “toxic” manosphere or the reactosphere talks about the far left-progressive radicalisation of women.

These women are not ideologically transhumanist, rather, evolutionary psychology has shaped women to adhere to the social contract much more so than men, and the result is whatever the social contract is at any given time, they conform to it — for the most part.

Women are certainly intelligent, wise, free thinking, and desiring of freedom and liberation. But as a whole, they are more susceptible to social consensus conformity, and tend to freak out when men go against it, even when those men are of high status; just look as Grime’s reaction to Musk.

More over, women (as a whole - not individually, as there are many expectations to the rule) will consistently vote against their own interests; they will support mass and illegal immigration leading toward major societal destabilisation, they will support “progressive” social advances without realising the consequences that will eventually lead to their obsolescence and mental health decline, rather than their liberation. Why, I don’t know, maybe it’s their caring matriarchal nature, maybe it’s hormonal, and explains why women and soy-males are more inclined to cultural Marxism. Ironically, and by no accident, it’s due to all of the things that the woke left deny exist and prohibit one to discuss, or maybe it’s all down to the algorithms?

Today, I identify more closely with the “NPCs” and the normies I opposed two decades ago. These are people who are trying to build lives, homes, families, afford holidays, time off with their partners and kids, whilst balancing work and providership; thats deeply human, its how we continue, its how we stay human, and things must continue this way.

If not adapting to whatever is coming down the pipeline; brain-machine interfaces and neural implants, artificial wombs, collective breeding, genetic engineering, biotech integration and nanotechnology, mixed and augmented reality interfaces, and AI-cyborgian integration, means going the way of the Australian aboriginals, then how do we step up, and reinstantiate normality whilst rejecting absorption into the alien system that is coming?

— UBI, digital IDs (which are still arriving through the back door,) social credit systems and programmable money set to cripple us into a state of neo-serdom, whilst elites build out in space. Mass surveillance and facial recognition cameras being rolled out everywhere, especially in London.

In a way, we’re already arriving at a similar plight, and although it doesn’t look exactly the same (alcohol consumption is declining for example); the loneliness epidemic, the social isolation, the mental health crisis, the job-market collapse, the rise in childlessness, the dating crisis and divergence between the sexes, puts us in an even worse position than the Aboriginals, who are at least above replacement level birth rates.

Despite my “schizo-autist coded” appearance, I’m really just a normie, a normal mammalian human-being. The “schizo-autist coded operating system” is necessary wetware for waging all out war against SETHIX. Progressive and radical liberalism and leftism is the poison, not the remedy.

The path forward is remembering what is fundamental and essential about us, things we forget, because the social contract is corrupted, poisoned, and it’s getting worse. We need to heal, and the only way that we can do that is to progress spiritually and in higher positive consciousness; the term Avatar Primitivism is strange, I’ll give it that, but it’s stuck as a label for exploring radical ideas like normal, essential human functioning, and species continuity.

If we are going to survive and continue humanity, by practicing natural births, and normal family arrangements, whilst rejecting the transhumanism and the alien hybridisation agendas, then we have to build a new social contract. If modern society keeps alienating men, then we men of integrity and spirit are sure to eventually step up, tear it all down, and build something better.

At the moment, we are nowhere near that stage, as we’re fast approaching the collapse phase.

This is planting seeds for the NextWorld, and at this point, I’m prepared to all out tear down the technosphere, who’s with me?

Xegis