InfoFi Trinity "Mouth-Looting" Guide: Kaito, Cookie, and Galxe
Over the past week, the cryptocurrency market has been sluggish, but "mouth-looting" has gained attention as a new way to participate. This article focuses on the three major "mouth-looting" projects: Kaito, Cookie, and Galxe. In the past week, the market has been in a tug-of-war, with the overall cryptocurrency market falling into a slump. Both price performance and community discussion热度 have been as stagnant as a dead pool. However, in this silence, a new way of participation has increasin...
The Quiet End of an Era: How Wallets Lost the Battle for Traffic to CEXs
An era has quietly come to an end. Wallets, as standalone products, seem to have reached their twilight. Struggling with profitability, they are increasingly being acquired or integrated by centralized exchanges (CEXs) or traditional fintech giants, becoming mere components of larger ecosystems—such as stablecoin payments—rather than the focal point of industry development.The Decline of Standalone WalletsFor entrepreneurs in the space, persistence has become a virtue in itself. The goal? Sur...
Impact of SynFutures' Entry into AI Agents
From SynFutures to AI Agents: A New Era for DeFAI The product form of AI Agents is more suited to appear as embedded service middleware, which helps to bring the trading experience back to the simplicity and intuitiveness of Web2. The revival of the AI Agent track will not be driven by "CA engineers" who excel in performance, but by "product engineers" who focus on practical implementation. In the midst of a market sentiment storm caused by the collective failure of on-chain PVP leaders and t...
InfoFi Trinity "Mouth-Looting" Guide: Kaito, Cookie, and Galxe
Over the past week, the cryptocurrency market has been sluggish, but "mouth-looting" has gained attention as a new way to participate. This article focuses on the three major "mouth-looting" projects: Kaito, Cookie, and Galxe. In the past week, the market has been in a tug-of-war, with the overall cryptocurrency market falling into a slump. Both price performance and community discussion热度 have been as stagnant as a dead pool. However, in this silence, a new way of participation has increasin...
The Quiet End of an Era: How Wallets Lost the Battle for Traffic to CEXs
An era has quietly come to an end. Wallets, as standalone products, seem to have reached their twilight. Struggling with profitability, they are increasingly being acquired or integrated by centralized exchanges (CEXs) or traditional fintech giants, becoming mere components of larger ecosystems—such as stablecoin payments—rather than the focal point of industry development.The Decline of Standalone WalletsFor entrepreneurs in the space, persistence has become a virtue in itself. The goal? Sur...
Impact of SynFutures' Entry into AI Agents
From SynFutures to AI Agents: A New Era for DeFAI The product form of AI Agents is more suited to appear as embedded service middleware, which helps to bring the trading experience back to the simplicity and intuitiveness of Web2. The revival of the AI Agent track will not be driven by "CA engineers" who excel in performance, but by "product engineers" who focus on practical implementation. In the midst of a market sentiment storm caused by the collective failure of on-chain PVP leaders and t...
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
According to a groundbreaking study by Flashbots data analyst danning (arXiv:2507.13023), the profitability of MEV arbitrage bots in CEX-DEX markets reveals:
Overall Profit Scale
19 leading arbitrage bots over 19 months:
Total trading volume: $241 billion
Gross profits: $233.8 million
Net earnings: $90.1 million (after paying $143.7 million to block builders)
Average profit margin: 38.5%
Market Concentration
The CEX-DEX arbitrage market shows "high monopolization", dominated by top MEV bots.
Arbitrage opportunities typically vanish within 0.5-2 seconds, with the optimal hedging window at 0.5-1.5 seconds.
Profit Distribution Among Block Builders
rsync (3rd place):
After abandoning the "order flow war", its market share declined but profit margins surged from 5% to 25%+, achieving a 27% composite margin (arbitrage + block building).
beaverbuild (1st place): Composite margin just 7.92% (including arbitrage profits).
Titan (2nd place): No proprietary arbitrage, with margins at merely 5.85%.
Profit Shifting and Market Structure
Deeper integration with block builders leads to thinner surface profits (actual profits shift to affiliated parties).
Smaller market share builders see their associated arbitrageurs retain higher effective margins.
Thin Margins in Block Building
Even top-ranked builders operate on razor-thin margins (5-8%) unless controlling high-value MEV order flow.
Current Issues:
Inefficient block auction mechanisms: Subsidies compress builder profits while exclusive partnerships delay transaction finality.
Extreme market concentration creates barriers for new entrants.
Potential Solutions:
Flashbots' BuilderNet: A decentralized collaborative building approach that may optimize MEV distribution and enhance builder profitability.
While MEV bots generate substantial but concentrated profits in CEX-DEX arbitrage (averaging 38.5% margins), the reality reflects market monopolization and profit shifting. Decentralized solutions like BuilderNet could reshape the industry landscape.
Recommended Reading:
*Translated with emphasis on:
Financial precision (e.g., "composite margin" for 综合利润率)
MEV industry terminology (e.g., "order flow war")
Dynamic readability for crypto-native audiences*
According to a groundbreaking study by Flashbots data analyst danning (arXiv:2507.13023), the profitability of MEV arbitrage bots in CEX-DEX markets reveals:
Overall Profit Scale
19 leading arbitrage bots over 19 months:
Total trading volume: $241 billion
Gross profits: $233.8 million
Net earnings: $90.1 million (after paying $143.7 million to block builders)
Average profit margin: 38.5%
Market Concentration
The CEX-DEX arbitrage market shows "high monopolization", dominated by top MEV bots.
Arbitrage opportunities typically vanish within 0.5-2 seconds, with the optimal hedging window at 0.5-1.5 seconds.
Profit Distribution Among Block Builders
rsync (3rd place):
After abandoning the "order flow war", its market share declined but profit margins surged from 5% to 25%+, achieving a 27% composite margin (arbitrage + block building).
beaverbuild (1st place): Composite margin just 7.92% (including arbitrage profits).
Titan (2nd place): No proprietary arbitrage, with margins at merely 5.85%.
Profit Shifting and Market Structure
Deeper integration with block builders leads to thinner surface profits (actual profits shift to affiliated parties).
Smaller market share builders see their associated arbitrageurs retain higher effective margins.
Thin Margins in Block Building
Even top-ranked builders operate on razor-thin margins (5-8%) unless controlling high-value MEV order flow.
Current Issues:
Inefficient block auction mechanisms: Subsidies compress builder profits while exclusive partnerships delay transaction finality.
Extreme market concentration creates barriers for new entrants.
Potential Solutions:
Flashbots' BuilderNet: A decentralized collaborative building approach that may optimize MEV distribution and enhance builder profitability.
While MEV bots generate substantial but concentrated profits in CEX-DEX arbitrage (averaging 38.5% margins), the reality reflects market monopolization and profit shifting. Decentralized solutions like BuilderNet could reshape the industry landscape.
Recommended Reading:
*Translated with emphasis on:
Financial precision (e.g., "composite margin" for 综合利润率)
MEV industry terminology (e.g., "order flow war")
Dynamic readability for crypto-native audiences*
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet