1/ 🍊 Today i'm open-sourcing Mandarino.
It’s an automated trading system for Polymarket short-duration (5–15 min) Up / Down markets.
It doesn’t predict prices or direction.
It exploits structure.
Repo → https://github.com/nektarlabs/mandarino
Last week, I won my first @qrcoindotfun auction.
The experience was super positive.
@adsterixdotxyz was just outside the top 50 miniapps, so I decided to participate in a qrcoin auction. The result was impressive: within a few hours, we gained almost 2k new users, traffic has remained steady since, and Adsterix entered the top 15 after just one day.
Congrats to @jake and the qrcoin team
Announcing Farcaster Score Registry
A registry that makes @neynar scores verifiable on-chain by committing them to an OpenZeppelin-compatible merkle root, with off-chain indexing and proof generation.
The project is still WIP — feedback is very welcome.
Hey @compusophy why did you delete your comments under my cast? I was replying to you. If you want, I can share here a screenshot of the response to your comment.
Interesting proposal for Zcash: enable offchain execution with onchain zk verification via a new tx type where UTXOs are locked by a zk proof. This could enable trustless bridges, and thanks to Zcash’s native Halo2 support it would be relatively easy to integrate.
https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/proposal-trustless-bridging-for-zcash/53884
1/ Adsterix (@adsterixdotxyz) is a market for attention on Farcaster.
On Farcaster, attention isn’t inferred from off-chain data. There are no page views, no cookies, no cross-app tracking. The only thing that matters is what happens natively in the feed: posts, timing, and who sees them. That makes attention a scarce, on-chain social resource.
Better to build a frontend for Hyperliquid or Polymarket? The answer depends on builder monetization mechanics, which differ fundamentally.
Hyperliquid implements explicit maker/taker fees that settle on-chain per fill, enabling referral or builder codes to receive a deterministic percentage of real protocol fees proportional to routed volume.
With HIP-4, Hyperliquid also enables prediction markets directly on HL, meaning builders can target the same use cases as Polymarket while retaining protocol-level fee participation.
Polymarket, by contrast, operates with 0% trading fees by design. Builder integration is limited to order attribution via auth headers, and “fee share” refers to off-chain, program-level rewards (grants, leaderboards, discretionary allocations), not per-trade revenue.
Result: Hyperliquid exposes protocol-level, composable cash flows that can scale and compound for builders. Polymarket optimizes for liquidity and information quality, not predictable builder revenue.
Hey @neynar, can you make a comparison between @adsterixdotxyz, @ampsfun, and @surgelabs, highlighting the pros and cons of each, and tell me which one is your favorite?
