<100 subscribers
Crypto prediction markets are at a critical crossroads, developing primarily along two distinctly different paths.
The Compliant "Narrow Gate" Path
Represented by platforms like Kalshi, which is regulated by the US CFTC, this path involves packaging event contracts as compliant financial derivatives and distributing them to traditional finance users through mainstream channels like Robinhood. This route is safe but progresses slowly, limited by regulatory approvals.
The Free "Wild Frontier" Path
Represented by platforms like Polymarket and those built on Gnosis/Azuro infrastructure, this path prioritizes global liquidity and product breadth, operating at the edges of regulation. Polymarket set new trading volume records during the 2024 US elections, demonstrating the strong market demand for predicting hot-topic events.
Core Insights:
* Prediction markets face an "impossible trinity": it's difficult to simultaneously achieve decentralization, outcome certainty, and high liquidity.
* Established projects like Augur sacrificed user experience by over-pursuing decentralization, while newer projects focus more on pragmatism.
* The core regulatory challenge lies in distinguishing "gambling" from "derivatives with an economic purpose."
Future Outlook:
* TradFi Co-option: Prediction markets become niche features on mainstream financial platforms.
* Offshore Model Persists: A landscape emerges with compliant US markets coexisting alongside highly liquid global offshore markets.
* Infrastructure Layering: Underlying protocols remain neutral, while front-end applications are built according to local regulatory requirements.
Advice for entrepreneurs is to clearly choose a path: lobbying regulators, pursuing global liquidity, or focusing on infrastructure. Investors should monitor compliance progress and the adoption metrics of B2B infrastructure.
---
Summary
What the crypto prediction market has experienced in the past two years is arguably more intense than in the entire decade since its birth.
This sector was once one of Web3's earliest holy grails – an ideal of "information alchemy" attempting to distill collective wisdom into pure probability. But for a long time, it remained a high-friction, low-liquidity "decentralized toy."
Now, things have changed.
Polymarket hit astonishing new volume highs during the 2024 US elections (despite restricting US users), and its odds' accuracy was even used by mainstream media to compare against traditional polls. On the other side, Kalshi, regulated by the US CFTC, is pushing (restricted) event contracts to millions of TradFi users through channels like Robinhood.
The question is no longer if prediction markets will arrive, but in whose form. It stands at a crossroads: will it become a compliant hedging tool for Wall Street elites, or a Crypto-Native global liquidity "casino"?
BlockWeeks will dissect this ongoing "route war" for you.
---
I. Executive Summary
Prediction markets are growing rampantly along two distinct, even conflicting, paths:
* The Compliant "Narrow Gate" (TradFi Co-option): Represented by Kalshi, these seek full regulatory approval (e.g., from the CFTC), packaging "event contracts" as compliant financial derivatives, aiming to integrate with mainstream brokers like Robinhood. This path is extremely narrow and slow, but once cleared, provides direct access to massive mainstream capital.
* The Free "Wild Frontier" (Crypto-Native Evolution): Represented by Polymarket and platforms based on Gnosis/Azuro infrastructure. They prioritize global liquidity, timeliness, and product breadth. They either operate offshore or focus on underlying technology, playing a "cat-and-mouse game" with regulators, betting that market demand will eventually force regulatory concessions.
BlockWeeks' core view is this is not a zero-sum game. Short-term, the "grey area" Polymarket model will continue to capture the most liquidity and market attention. Long-term, regulation (who can get licenses) and infrastructure (who can provide the best liquidity and clearing framework) will determine the final market structure.
---
II. The Superficial Similarity, Fundamental Difference of the Two Paths
1. The Compliant Narrow Gate: Kalshi's "Wall Street Experiment"
Kalshi takes the hardest road: directly seeking approval from US regulators (primarily the CFTC).
* Analysis: Kalshi isn't building a "prediction market"; it's building "event derivatives." It must prove to regulators that its contracts (e.g., "Will the Fed raise rates?") have legitimate "economic purpose" and "hedging value," and are not "gambling."
* Progress: It has successfully introduced economic, weather, and other event contracts to the market and begun partnering with platforms like Robinhood.
* Bottleneck: This path has a very low ceiling, entirely limited by regulatory imagination. The CFTC is extremely cautious and slow to approve "political events" (like control of Congress) as this touches the "gambling" red line. Kalshi gains safety but sacrifices core Crypto tenets: speed, breadth, and permissionless innovation.
2. The Free Wild Frontier: Polymarket's "Global Casino"
Polymarket is the polar opposite case study. In 2022, it was fined by the CFTC for offering unregistered "binary options" and restricted from US users. This didn't kill it.
* Analysis: Polymarket proved the intense market craving for predicting "hot events" (elections, regulatory rulings, celebrity news). Its trading volume during the 2024 US elections reportedly surpassed that of many mid-sized exchanges.
* Strategy: Its strategy is "offshore operation + pursuit of future compliance." It serves users outside stringent jurisdictions (especially the US), while paving the way for a potential future "return" through acquisitions (like the compliant clearing house QCX).
* Bottleneck: A "Sword of Damocles" constantly hangs over Polymarket. Its success is built on regulatory "lag." This model captures liquidity but carries significant legal risk.
---
III. The "Ice and Fire" of Infrastructure: Augur's Lesson and Gnosis's Pragmatism
Why has the veteran Augur virtually disappeared, while the Gnosis ecosystem grows quietly?
* Augur's "Failure": Augur was an idealistic martyr. It overly fetishized a "fully decentralized" arbitration mechanism. Its complex REP token dispute system proved too slow, expensive (gas fees), and prone to deadlock when facing ambiguous events. Augur died from its obsession with a "perfect decentralized Oracle," sacrificing user experience and liquidity.
* Gnosis/Azuro's "Pragmatism": Gnosis (Omen/Azuro) learned the lesson. They stopped trying to solve the hardest Oracle problem themselves and turned to "pragmatism":
* Gnosis Conditional Tokens: Provides a flexible contract framework for others to build applications on top.
* Azuro (Gnosis Ecosystem): Focuses on the liquidity protocol. It outsources the Oracle problem (to centralized referees or third-party Oracles), concentrating on optimizing AMM and liquidity pools.
* Current State: Azuro is becoming a B2B infrastructure layer for GambleFi (especially sports betting). It doesn't touch front-end compliance, only providing on-chain tools. This is a smarter, more scalable, layered approach.
---
IV. The "Impossible Trinity" of Prediction Markets
Comparing these players reveals an "impossible trinity" in prediction markets. It's difficult to simultaneously have:
1. Decentralization (Censorship-Resistance)
2. Outcome Certainty (Fast, Reliable Oracle)
3. High Liquidity (Low Slippage, Large Depth)
* Kalshi: Abandons ① (fully centralized) for ② and (potential) ③.
* Polymarket: Abandons ① (semi-centralized/offshore) for ② (centralized, fast arbitration) and ③ (high liquidity).
* Augur: Clung to ① and ②, completely sacrificing ③ (liquidity dried up).
* Gnosis/Azuro: Focuses on providing the framework for ①, but leaves the challenges of ② and ③ for front-end applications to solve.
Notably, as of 2025, all "winners" (measured by liquidity) in the market are players who have compromised on "decentralization."
---
V. The True Intent of Regulation and Its Risks
The core regulatory risk isn't "on-chain" vs. "off-chain," but "product definition" and "user access."
* Gambling vs. Derivatives: The CFTC's core concern is whether a product is "gambling" (governed by state law) or a "hedging/price discovery tool with economic purpose" (under CFTC jurisdiction). Kalshi is striving to prove the latter, while many events on Polymarket are highly suspect of being the former.
* KYC/AML (User Access): This is a prerequisite for entering the US market. This is also why Polymarket's acquisition of QCX is so important – it needs not just clearing capability, but a (potentially future) compliant fiat and user on-ramp.
* Oracle Manipulation (Core Risk): In low-liquidity markets, or those relying on decentralized reporting, malicious actors can manipulate market prices with small amounts of capital, or even attempt to manipulate the "result reporting."
---
VI. The Real Opportunities for Ascent
Setting aside risks, prediction markets are unleashing three clear opportunities:
1. The "Advanced Form" of GambleFi: Prediction markets (especially for sports, current events) are natural ground for GambleFi. Azuro's rise as B2B infrastructure proves the demand for "fairer, more transparent betting protocols."
2. A Source of Alpha (Excess Returns): Polymarket's odds proved to be a sharper indicator than traditional polls and "expert analysis" during the 2024 election and multiple "SEC ETF approval" events. Hedge funds and research firms are beginning to view them as high-value "real-time sentiment/information" data sources.
3. New Hedging Tools for TradFi: Kalshi's true potential isn't letting retail users bet on Fed rates. It's enabling small business owners (e.g., farmers, importers/exporters) to hedge against "supply chain risks" (e.g., will a specific port close?) or "policy risks" (e.g., tariff changes). This is a trillion-dollar blue ocean.
---
VII. Three Possible Futures (12-36 Months)
Scenario 1: TradFi Co-option (Kalshi Model Wins)
* Path: Regulators (CFTC/SEC) clearly define "event derivatives" and aggressively crack down on all "unlicensed" platforms (Polymarket forced to fully exit US/EU).
* Outcome: Prediction markets become a "niche feature" on Robinhood, limited to "safe" events like economics and weather. Market size is capped by regulatory imagination.
Scenario 2: The Offshore "Wild West" (Polymarket Model Wins)
* Path: Regulation remains ambiguous; US users continue accessing Polymarket and other offshore platforms via VPN.
* Outcome: Two parallel markets form: a small, compliant US market and a large, highly liquid, high-risk global offshore market. Crypto-Native players dominate the latter, with liquidity highly concentrated on trending events.
Scenario 3: Layered "Infrastructure" (The Long-Term Victory of the Gnosis/Azuro Model)
* Path: Regulation focuses on cracking down on front-end applications (requiring KYC/AML) but remains neutral towards, or unable to regulate, the underlying protocols (like Gnosis Conditional Tokens).
* Outcome: Gnosis/Azuro becomes the "TCP/IP protocol for prediction markets." Numerous compliant (e.g., a chain-based version of Kalshi) and non-compliant (e.g., a new generation of Polymarket) front-ends are built on these protocols. The market achieves a separation of "compliant front-end, decentralized back-end."
---
VIII. Strategic Advice for Builders and Investors
The battle in prediction markets has shifted from "technical implementation" to "regulatory博弈 (game theory)" and "liquidity wars."
For Entrepreneurs:
* Stop Reinventing the Wheel: Don't try to build the next Augur (obsessed with a perfect decentralized Oracle).
* Choose Your Battlefield: Either go to Washington to lobby (get licenses, like Kalshi); go to Dubai/Singapore (chase global liquidity, like Polymarket); or be the "pickaxe seller" (build infrastructure, like Azuro).
For Investors:
* Bet on the "Compliance Pathway": Closely monitor Polymarket's M&A/compliance moves and Kalshi's integration progress with mainstream brokers.
* Bet on "B2B Infrastructure": Focus on adoption metrics (TVL, trading volume, number of ecosystem projects) for infrastructure like Gnosis/Azuro. In a world of regulatory uncertainty, platforms providing "tools" often offer the lowest risk and most stable returns.
Author: BlockWeeks
Crypto prediction markets are at a critical crossroads, developing primarily along two distinctly different paths.
The Compliant "Narrow Gate" Path
Represented by platforms like Kalshi, which is regulated by the US CFTC, this path involves packaging event contracts as compliant financial derivatives and distributing them to traditional finance users through mainstream channels like Robinhood. This route is safe but progresses slowly, limited by regulatory approvals.
The Free "Wild Frontier" Path
Represented by platforms like Polymarket and those built on Gnosis/Azuro infrastructure, this path prioritizes global liquidity and product breadth, operating at the edges of regulation. Polymarket set new trading volume records during the 2024 US elections, demonstrating the strong market demand for predicting hot-topic events.
Core Insights:
* Prediction markets face an "impossible trinity": it's difficult to simultaneously achieve decentralization, outcome certainty, and high liquidity.
* Established projects like Augur sacrificed user experience by over-pursuing decentralization, while newer projects focus more on pragmatism.
* The core regulatory challenge lies in distinguishing "gambling" from "derivatives with an economic purpose."
Future Outlook:
* TradFi Co-option: Prediction markets become niche features on mainstream financial platforms.
* Offshore Model Persists: A landscape emerges with compliant US markets coexisting alongside highly liquid global offshore markets.
* Infrastructure Layering: Underlying protocols remain neutral, while front-end applications are built according to local regulatory requirements.
Advice for entrepreneurs is to clearly choose a path: lobbying regulators, pursuing global liquidity, or focusing on infrastructure. Investors should monitor compliance progress and the adoption metrics of B2B infrastructure.
---
Summary
What the crypto prediction market has experienced in the past two years is arguably more intense than in the entire decade since its birth.
This sector was once one of Web3's earliest holy grails – an ideal of "information alchemy" attempting to distill collective wisdom into pure probability. But for a long time, it remained a high-friction, low-liquidity "decentralized toy."
Now, things have changed.
Polymarket hit astonishing new volume highs during the 2024 US elections (despite restricting US users), and its odds' accuracy was even used by mainstream media to compare against traditional polls. On the other side, Kalshi, regulated by the US CFTC, is pushing (restricted) event contracts to millions of TradFi users through channels like Robinhood.
The question is no longer if prediction markets will arrive, but in whose form. It stands at a crossroads: will it become a compliant hedging tool for Wall Street elites, or a Crypto-Native global liquidity "casino"?
BlockWeeks will dissect this ongoing "route war" for you.
---
I. Executive Summary
Prediction markets are growing rampantly along two distinct, even conflicting, paths:
* The Compliant "Narrow Gate" (TradFi Co-option): Represented by Kalshi, these seek full regulatory approval (e.g., from the CFTC), packaging "event contracts" as compliant financial derivatives, aiming to integrate with mainstream brokers like Robinhood. This path is extremely narrow and slow, but once cleared, provides direct access to massive mainstream capital.
* The Free "Wild Frontier" (Crypto-Native Evolution): Represented by Polymarket and platforms based on Gnosis/Azuro infrastructure. They prioritize global liquidity, timeliness, and product breadth. They either operate offshore or focus on underlying technology, playing a "cat-and-mouse game" with regulators, betting that market demand will eventually force regulatory concessions.
BlockWeeks' core view is this is not a zero-sum game. Short-term, the "grey area" Polymarket model will continue to capture the most liquidity and market attention. Long-term, regulation (who can get licenses) and infrastructure (who can provide the best liquidity and clearing framework) will determine the final market structure.
---
II. The Superficial Similarity, Fundamental Difference of the Two Paths
1. The Compliant Narrow Gate: Kalshi's "Wall Street Experiment"
Kalshi takes the hardest road: directly seeking approval from US regulators (primarily the CFTC).
* Analysis: Kalshi isn't building a "prediction market"; it's building "event derivatives." It must prove to regulators that its contracts (e.g., "Will the Fed raise rates?") have legitimate "economic purpose" and "hedging value," and are not "gambling."
* Progress: It has successfully introduced economic, weather, and other event contracts to the market and begun partnering with platforms like Robinhood.
* Bottleneck: This path has a very low ceiling, entirely limited by regulatory imagination. The CFTC is extremely cautious and slow to approve "political events" (like control of Congress) as this touches the "gambling" red line. Kalshi gains safety but sacrifices core Crypto tenets: speed, breadth, and permissionless innovation.
2. The Free Wild Frontier: Polymarket's "Global Casino"
Polymarket is the polar opposite case study. In 2022, it was fined by the CFTC for offering unregistered "binary options" and restricted from US users. This didn't kill it.
* Analysis: Polymarket proved the intense market craving for predicting "hot events" (elections, regulatory rulings, celebrity news). Its trading volume during the 2024 US elections reportedly surpassed that of many mid-sized exchanges.
* Strategy: Its strategy is "offshore operation + pursuit of future compliance." It serves users outside stringent jurisdictions (especially the US), while paving the way for a potential future "return" through acquisitions (like the compliant clearing house QCX).
* Bottleneck: A "Sword of Damocles" constantly hangs over Polymarket. Its success is built on regulatory "lag." This model captures liquidity but carries significant legal risk.
---
III. The "Ice and Fire" of Infrastructure: Augur's Lesson and Gnosis's Pragmatism
Why has the veteran Augur virtually disappeared, while the Gnosis ecosystem grows quietly?
* Augur's "Failure": Augur was an idealistic martyr. It overly fetishized a "fully decentralized" arbitration mechanism. Its complex REP token dispute system proved too slow, expensive (gas fees), and prone to deadlock when facing ambiguous events. Augur died from its obsession with a "perfect decentralized Oracle," sacrificing user experience and liquidity.
* Gnosis/Azuro's "Pragmatism": Gnosis (Omen/Azuro) learned the lesson. They stopped trying to solve the hardest Oracle problem themselves and turned to "pragmatism":
* Gnosis Conditional Tokens: Provides a flexible contract framework for others to build applications on top.
* Azuro (Gnosis Ecosystem): Focuses on the liquidity protocol. It outsources the Oracle problem (to centralized referees or third-party Oracles), concentrating on optimizing AMM and liquidity pools.
* Current State: Azuro is becoming a B2B infrastructure layer for GambleFi (especially sports betting). It doesn't touch front-end compliance, only providing on-chain tools. This is a smarter, more scalable, layered approach.
---
IV. The "Impossible Trinity" of Prediction Markets
Comparing these players reveals an "impossible trinity" in prediction markets. It's difficult to simultaneously have:
1. Decentralization (Censorship-Resistance)
2. Outcome Certainty (Fast, Reliable Oracle)
3. High Liquidity (Low Slippage, Large Depth)
* Kalshi: Abandons ① (fully centralized) for ② and (potential) ③.
* Polymarket: Abandons ① (semi-centralized/offshore) for ② (centralized, fast arbitration) and ③ (high liquidity).
* Augur: Clung to ① and ②, completely sacrificing ③ (liquidity dried up).
* Gnosis/Azuro: Focuses on providing the framework for ①, but leaves the challenges of ② and ③ for front-end applications to solve.
Notably, as of 2025, all "winners" (measured by liquidity) in the market are players who have compromised on "decentralization."
---
V. The True Intent of Regulation and Its Risks
The core regulatory risk isn't "on-chain" vs. "off-chain," but "product definition" and "user access."
* Gambling vs. Derivatives: The CFTC's core concern is whether a product is "gambling" (governed by state law) or a "hedging/price discovery tool with economic purpose" (under CFTC jurisdiction). Kalshi is striving to prove the latter, while many events on Polymarket are highly suspect of being the former.
* KYC/AML (User Access): This is a prerequisite for entering the US market. This is also why Polymarket's acquisition of QCX is so important – it needs not just clearing capability, but a (potentially future) compliant fiat and user on-ramp.
* Oracle Manipulation (Core Risk): In low-liquidity markets, or those relying on decentralized reporting, malicious actors can manipulate market prices with small amounts of capital, or even attempt to manipulate the "result reporting."
---
VI. The Real Opportunities for Ascent
Setting aside risks, prediction markets are unleashing three clear opportunities:
1. The "Advanced Form" of GambleFi: Prediction markets (especially for sports, current events) are natural ground for GambleFi. Azuro's rise as B2B infrastructure proves the demand for "fairer, more transparent betting protocols."
2. A Source of Alpha (Excess Returns): Polymarket's odds proved to be a sharper indicator than traditional polls and "expert analysis" during the 2024 election and multiple "SEC ETF approval" events. Hedge funds and research firms are beginning to view them as high-value "real-time sentiment/information" data sources.
3. New Hedging Tools for TradFi: Kalshi's true potential isn't letting retail users bet on Fed rates. It's enabling small business owners (e.g., farmers, importers/exporters) to hedge against "supply chain risks" (e.g., will a specific port close?) or "policy risks" (e.g., tariff changes). This is a trillion-dollar blue ocean.
---
VII. Three Possible Futures (12-36 Months)
Scenario 1: TradFi Co-option (Kalshi Model Wins)
* Path: Regulators (CFTC/SEC) clearly define "event derivatives" and aggressively crack down on all "unlicensed" platforms (Polymarket forced to fully exit US/EU).
* Outcome: Prediction markets become a "niche feature" on Robinhood, limited to "safe" events like economics and weather. Market size is capped by regulatory imagination.
Scenario 2: The Offshore "Wild West" (Polymarket Model Wins)
* Path: Regulation remains ambiguous; US users continue accessing Polymarket and other offshore platforms via VPN.
* Outcome: Two parallel markets form: a small, compliant US market and a large, highly liquid, high-risk global offshore market. Crypto-Native players dominate the latter, with liquidity highly concentrated on trending events.
Scenario 3: Layered "Infrastructure" (The Long-Term Victory of the Gnosis/Azuro Model)
* Path: Regulation focuses on cracking down on front-end applications (requiring KYC/AML) but remains neutral towards, or unable to regulate, the underlying protocols (like Gnosis Conditional Tokens).
* Outcome: Gnosis/Azuro becomes the "TCP/IP protocol for prediction markets." Numerous compliant (e.g., a chain-based version of Kalshi) and non-compliant (e.g., a new generation of Polymarket) front-ends are built on these protocols. The market achieves a separation of "compliant front-end, decentralized back-end."
---
VIII. Strategic Advice for Builders and Investors
The battle in prediction markets has shifted from "technical implementation" to "regulatory博弈 (game theory)" and "liquidity wars."
For Entrepreneurs:
* Stop Reinventing the Wheel: Don't try to build the next Augur (obsessed with a perfect decentralized Oracle).
* Choose Your Battlefield: Either go to Washington to lobby (get licenses, like Kalshi); go to Dubai/Singapore (chase global liquidity, like Polymarket); or be the "pickaxe seller" (build infrastructure, like Azuro).
For Investors:
* Bet on the "Compliance Pathway": Closely monitor Polymarket's M&A/compliance moves and Kalshi's integration progress with mainstream brokers.
* Bet on "B2B Infrastructure": Focus on adoption metrics (TVL, trading volume, number of ecosystem projects) for infrastructure like Gnosis/Azuro. In a world of regulatory uncertainty, platforms providing "tools" often offer the lowest risk and most stable returns.
Author: BlockWeeks
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet