DAOs were supposed to revolutionize governance. No more centralization, no more closed-door decisions, just a decentralized system where everyone has a voice. Sounds perfect, right?

Except… most DAOs failed. Treasuries got drained, proposals were ignored and communities lost interest. Who’s to blame? The founders? The members? The entire concept?

Here’s the real reason DAOs didn’t work and what can still be saved.

Voter Apathy Killed Most DAOs

Everyone wanted decentralized governance, but when it came time to vote… no one showed up.

The mistake:

• Low participation rates, decisions were made by a tiny group instead of the full community.

• Governance became a game for whales, the more tokens you had, the more power you held.

• Most members didn’t care enough to engage, unless financial incentives were involved.

The fix:

• Lower friction for voting, make it as easy as clicking a button.

• Reputation-based voting, influence should be based on contributions, not just token holdings.

• Gamify governance, reward long-term engagement, not just short-term farming.

Decentralization Without Structure = Chaos

A DAO without a clear governance structure is a mess. Who makes decisions? Who executes them? Without leadership, nothing moves forward.

The mistake:

• Too many DAOs launched without a clear framework, leading to endless debates and zero execution.

• No accountability, if no one is responsible, nothing gets done.

• Too much focus on decentralization, not enough on operational efficiency.

The fix:

• Create core working groups, DAOs need leaders (even if they rotate).

• Define decision-making processes, not every vote needs the entire community.

• Combine on-chain and off-chain governance, some decisions can be automated, others need human input.

DAOs don’t need to be leaderless, they need structured decentralization.

DAO Treasuries Became Cash Grabs

Many DAOs raised millions in funding, but instead of careful treasury management, funds were drained with little oversight.

The mistake:

• Proposals focused on spending money, not growing the ecosystem.

• Lack of financial transparency, members had no clue where funds were going.

• No sustainability, when funds ran out, so did the DAO.

The fix:

• Smart treasury management, funding should be allocated based on long-term impact.

• ROI-based proposals, every spend should have a clear benefit to the ecosystem.

• Financial accountability, regular reports, audits and transparent dashboards.

A DAO without strong treasury management is just a short-term Ponzi.

So, Are DAOs Dead? Or Can They Be Saved?

DAOs failed because they weren’t structured for success. But that doesn’t mean the concept is broken.

The next wave of DAOs will be:

✔️ More structured, clear roles, responsibilities and execution models.
✔️ More inclusive, voting power based on contributions, not just holdings.✔️ More sustainable, better treasury management and long-term funding models.

Decentralization alone isn’t enough, execution matters. If DAOs evolve, they can still fulfill their original vision. Also, if you haven't checked it yet, Vitalik’s take on DAO 2.0 is a must-read.

What do you think, can DAOs be saved or is the experiment over?

DAOs were supposed to revolutionize governance. No more centralization, no more closed-door decisions, just a decentralized system where everyone has a voice. Sounds perfect, right?

Except… most DAOs failed. Treasuries got drained, proposals were ignored and communities lost interest. Who’s to blame? The founders? The members? The entire concept?

Here’s the real reason DAOs didn’t work and what can still be saved.

Voter Apathy Killed Most DAOs

Everyone wanted decentralized governance, but when it came time to vote… no one showed up.

The mistake:

• Low participation rates, decisions were made by a tiny group instead of the full community.

• Governance became a game for whales, the more tokens you had, the more power you held.

• Most members didn’t care enough to engage, unless financial incentives were involved.

The fix:

• Lower friction for voting, make it as easy as clicking a button.

• Reputation-based voting, influence should be based on contributions, not just token holdings.

• Gamify governance, reward long-term engagement, not just short-term farming.

Decentralization Without Structure = Chaos

A DAO without a clear governance structure is a mess. Who makes decisions? Who executes them? Without leadership, nothing moves forward.

The mistake:

• Too many DAOs launched without a clear framework, leading to endless debates and zero execution.

• No accountability, if no one is responsible, nothing gets done.

• Too much focus on decentralization, not enough on operational efficiency.

The fix:

• Create core working groups, DAOs need leaders (even if they rotate).

• Define decision-making processes, not every vote needs the entire community.

• Combine on-chain and off-chain governance, some decisions can be automated, others need human input.

DAOs don’t need to be leaderless, they need structured decentralization.

DAO Treasuries Became Cash Grabs

Many DAOs raised millions in funding, but instead of careful treasury management, funds were drained with little oversight.

The mistake:

• Proposals focused on spending money, not growing the ecosystem.

• Lack of financial transparency, members had no clue where funds were going.

• No sustainability, when funds ran out, so did the DAO.

The fix:

• Smart treasury management, funding should be allocated based on long-term impact.

• ROI-based proposals, every spend should have a clear benefit to the ecosystem.

• Financial accountability, regular reports, audits and transparent dashboards.

A DAO without strong treasury management is just a short-term Ponzi.

So, Are DAOs Dead? Or Can They Be Saved?

DAOs failed because they weren’t structured for success. But that doesn’t mean the concept is broken.

The next wave of DAOs will be:

✔️ More structured, clear roles, responsibilities and execution models.
✔️ More inclusive, voting power based on contributions, not just holdings.✔️ More sustainable, better treasury management and long-term funding models.

Decentralization alone isn’t enough, execution matters. If DAOs evolve, they can still fulfill their original vision. Also, if you haven't checked it yet, Vitalik’s take on DAO 2.0 is a must-read.

What do you think, can DAOs be saved or is the experiment over?