This note emerged from the author's longstanding puzzlement about philosophical discussions of knowledge—not confusion about the definitions and debates themselves, but about why we approach the topic the way we do. The text represents a systematic attempt to resolve this confusion by examining how the traditional definition of knowledge as justified true belief relates to actual epistemic practices. Beginning with everyday examples, like verifying whether it's raining, the author traces what ac

This note emerged from the author's longstanding puzzlement about philosophical discussions of knowledge—not confusion about the definitions and debates themselves, but about why we approach the topic the way we do. The text represents a systematic attempt to resolve this confusion by examining how the traditional definition of knowledge as justified true belief relates to actual epistemic practices. Beginning with everyday examples, like verifying whether it's raining, the author traces what ac

This essay explores "existence as process" via language models. Drawing from philosophical insights about observation shaping understanding, it argues intelligence exists in dialogue flow, not parameters. It identifies "process misalignment" in LLMs: training from human existence, runtime from dialogue, usage from tools. This mismatch causes hallucinations. Concludes intelligence is only perceivable through process, even mathematical potential exists within process.

This essay explores "existence as process" via language models. Drawing from philosophical insights about observation shaping understanding, it argues intelligence exists in dialogue flow, not parameters. It identifies "process misalignment" in LLMs: training from human existence, runtime from dialogue, usage from tools. This mismatch causes hallucinations. Concludes intelligence is only perceivable through process, even mathematical potential exists within process.