
That model collapses in crypto.
SocialFi isn’t “social media with tokens.” It’s a structural shift in who owns distribution. On protocols like Farcaster and Lens Protocol, creators own their content, their audience, and the economic upside of engagement. Followers aren’t just spectators — they can be financially aligned with your success.
That incentive change breaks traditional marketing logic.
Instead of burning budget on ads that evaporate, SocialFi turns marketing into a compounding asset. Engagement can be rewarded. Amplification becomes economic behavior. Communities grow because it benefits them to grow.
This is why chaos-driven brands win here.
Raw opinions aren’t punished. Experiments aren’t throttled. Speed, honesty, and iteration outperform polish and brand safety theater. Your chaos becomes leverage instead of liability.
Traditional marketing has diminishing returns and massive platform risk. SocialFi has increasing returns and protocol-level ownership. One rents attention. The other builds infrastructure.
You don’t need to abandon everything overnight. Start small. Measure on-chain signals, not vanity metrics. Shift budget as alignment proves itself.
In a year, some founders will own their distribution and their community economics.
Others will still be negotiating CPMs.
The question isn’t reach.
It’s ownership.
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Crypto Jazz Hands
No comments yet