So yesterday this happened:

I did not realise that the situation will cause some stir.

When I wrote Nobel Peace Prize (for ending war on drugs) it was obvious to me that it isn’t accomplished yet therefore it was even more obvious that it wasn’t accomplished by me.

https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/ZCEdD5Kmh7D8tODeOfcxgqZC3DY4cTMC2awu5x6_P2I

Winning multiple Nobel Prizes in the same year would be super good for the brand but again it was super obvious that it didn’t happen yet.

I even wrote explicitly: “Manifesting from the future [smiley face]”

A better, more thoughtful response:

I’m glad that I pass the bullshit threshold, to the point it’s borderline believable, where you need to ask for explicit clarifation

In Peace in Economy because it goes side by side, if people were presperous they wouldn’t go to war.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OdTZpenlMchQ0BcBrlCA5_GxxGZsSQaH8nABfagyoZo/edit

That heated debate got me into posting: OBVIOUS MISTAKE (I was acting out of frustration and anger)

Everything I wrote is truth, I stand by it, I want to preserve it, but for the benefit of the space - deleting from the public chat - posting on my personal blog.

This is an entire rabbit hole how we got here… Many years of engaging with bullshit legal system and a burning desire to make world a better place.

Justice matters. Truth matters. Strong institutions matter.

https://www.independenttribunal.org/

https://legalscreenshot.com/

Getting criminal record?

Getting a jail sentence?

Getting a death penalty?

Loads of things are death penalty in many jurisdictions, that’s why i thought that in order to simplify and remove uncertainty I may as well get it everywhere.

(as one of my surrogate identity clones, life is cool, I do not intend to die)

Incentives as driving force of the universe.

Incentived to survive and pass your genes.

Incentives in the economic system leading to climate collapse:

https://mirror.xyz/0x315f80C7cAaCBE7Fb1c14E65A634db89A33A9637/jvJw-qvCj857j3F9IOvYMzyo5Nxc6TdwrOg9o7LGp3g

Inspired by recent podcast Sam Altman and Joe Rogan, they talk about psychedelic therapy.

I wish I could evidence my experience.

That’s why the criminal record - if I get convicted for drugs it would require prosecution to evidence beyond reasonable doubt - problem solved.

(criminal convictions have undesirable side effects but after legalisation they will be removed anyway, that will help #FREEROSS at the same time)

I'm literally the source of consciousness communicating through the memes, activating global singularity.

Based on the time travel assumption, I may as well claim that I’m Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin, this is more plausible than Craig Wright who is a fraud.

Too many disjointed issues.

Speaking of issues. Using Github issues as a way of navigating between chapters…

“book of life” because I would like to describe my life, how one event led to another, how everything is interconnected. I also like the fact that GitHub preserves the history of edits, this can beome something relly cool but why would anyone read my personal stuff?

Or maybe some concepts described by me matter and are imporant for the entire humanity?

(YES: climate change is important, economic system is important, justice is important)

I truly enjoy the process of writing. Just like I enjoy gardening and running - possible to do things because they are enjoyable, no necessity to attach a business model.

Another piece of writing from yesterday…

https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/kJ-qx78zW3NApw-RTAcnQdaCSpUqRZkjS3AFxom5STs

Builds on previous context and situation in the UK.

If you are reading from outside of the UK = will not make much sense.

If you are reading without previous context = will not make much sense.

When I read it = it makes sense to me.

When I read it = I clearly see how one thread weaves with another.

Writing publicly helps organise my thoughts, forces me to be more thoughtful and precise but impossible to retrieve all the previous context into the individual post.

My original reply was OK.

It was the additional explanation that made it worse.

And now to wrap it up:

Everything I wrote is truth, I stand by it, I want to preserve it, but for the benefit of the space - deleting from the public chat - posting on my personal blog.

Exactly.

So yesterday this happened:

I did not realise that the situation will cause some stir.

When I wrote Nobel Peace Prize (for ending war on drugs) it was obvious to me that it isn’t accomplished yet therefore it was even more obvious that it wasn’t accomplished by me.

https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/ZCEdD5Kmh7D8tODeOfcxgqZC3DY4cTMC2awu5x6_P2I

Winning multiple Nobel Prizes in the same year would be super good for the brand but again it was super obvious that it didn’t happen yet.

I even wrote explicitly: “Manifesting from the future [smiley face]”

A better, more thoughtful response:

I’m glad that I pass the bullshit threshold, to the point it’s borderline believable, where you need to ask for explicit clarifation

In Peace in Economy because it goes side by side, if people were presperous they wouldn’t go to war.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OdTZpenlMchQ0BcBrlCA5_GxxGZsSQaH8nABfagyoZo/edit

That heated debate got me into posting: OBVIOUS MISTAKE (I was acting out of frustration and anger)

Everything I wrote is truth, I stand by it, I want to preserve it, but for the benefit of the space - deleting from the public chat - posting on my personal blog.

This is an entire rabbit hole how we got here… Many years of engaging with bullshit legal system and a burning desire to make world a better place.

Justice matters. Truth matters. Strong institutions matter.

https://www.independenttribunal.org/

https://legalscreenshot.com/

Getting criminal record?

Getting a jail sentence?

Getting a death penalty?

Loads of things are death penalty in many jurisdictions, that’s why i thought that in order to simplify and remove uncertainty I may as well get it everywhere.

(as one of my surrogate identity clones, life is cool, I do not intend to die)

Incentives as driving force of the universe.

Incentived to survive and pass your genes.

Incentives in the economic system leading to climate collapse:

https://mirror.xyz/0x315f80C7cAaCBE7Fb1c14E65A634db89A33A9637/jvJw-qvCj857j3F9IOvYMzyo5Nxc6TdwrOg9o7LGp3g

Inspired by recent podcast Sam Altman and Joe Rogan, they talk about psychedelic therapy.

I wish I could evidence my experience.

That’s why the criminal record - if I get convicted for drugs it would require prosecution to evidence beyond reasonable doubt - problem solved.

(criminal convictions have undesirable side effects but after legalisation they will be removed anyway, that will help #FREEROSS at the same time)

I'm literally the source of consciousness communicating through the memes, activating global singularity.

Based on the time travel assumption, I may as well claim that I’m Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin, this is more plausible than Craig Wright who is a fraud.

Too many disjointed issues.

Speaking of issues. Using Github issues as a way of navigating between chapters…

“book of life” because I would like to describe my life, how one event led to another, how everything is interconnected. I also like the fact that GitHub preserves the history of edits, this can beome something relly cool but why would anyone read my personal stuff?

Or maybe some concepts described by me matter and are imporant for the entire humanity?

(YES: climate change is important, economic system is important, justice is important)

I truly enjoy the process of writing. Just like I enjoy gardening and running - possible to do things because they are enjoyable, no necessity to attach a business model.

Another piece of writing from yesterday…

https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/kJ-qx78zW3NApw-RTAcnQdaCSpUqRZkjS3AFxom5STs

Builds on previous context and situation in the UK.

If you are reading from outside of the UK = will not make much sense.

If you are reading without previous context = will not make much sense.

When I read it = it makes sense to me.

When I read it = I clearly see how one thread weaves with another.

Writing publicly helps organise my thoughts, forces me to be more thoughtful and precise but impossible to retrieve all the previous context into the individual post.

My original reply was OK.

It was the additional explanation that made it worse.

And now to wrap it up:

Everything I wrote is truth, I stand by it, I want to preserve it, but for the benefit of the space - deleting from the public chat - posting on my personal blog.

Exactly.