Mars RobertsonAstral Pirate Hacker Ninja
TLDR: mission to unify humanity The easiest way to find me is simply search “Mars Robertson”, the name is unique, good for SEO:https://www.instagram.com/marsrobertson/Focusing my energy on these (related) projects:https://basex.com/ https://planetarycouncil.org/ https://genesis.re/Get yourself a passport, they increase in price with each purchase, the time is now: genesis.reI’ve been printing (and gifting) money from the future… EDIT: I got myself the domain: “money from the future .com”money...
Mars RobertsonYet another cancellation attempt
What travels faster than light? Memes, culture, rumours… (also the imagination, dreams, telepathy, quantum entanglement, astral plane, higher dimensions, wormholes, non-euclidean geometry)Reputation matters to meSituation is bizarre (on multiple levels)I really wish I could simply “let it go”But the rumours are spreading (small community)Clearly not good for businessThe Hero University pledge: https://draperuniversity.com/pledgeInstant lessonsKnow the full storyContext mattersShow empathyNo m...
Mars Robertson🔥🔥🔥 resume
The most mischievious accomplishments of 2023:1️⃣ Flirting on live TVhttps://twitter.com/GMB/status/1671390548853248003 Dedicated blogpost illustrating the full picture: https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/p849voNdxo21SRUggjVOVNAVY7bwiHkpeMu-8I13z8U2️⃣ Setting the weapons factory on fireI thought there is an ongoing siege and I was planning to jump through the fence and genuinely set it on fire. 100% legal, due to the recent ruling that “saving lives” is a reasonable excuse. https://twitter.com/m...
# Hack the planet(s)
Mars RobertsonAstral Pirate Hacker Ninja
TLDR: mission to unify humanity The easiest way to find me is simply search “Mars Robertson”, the name is unique, good for SEO:https://www.instagram.com/marsrobertson/Focusing my energy on these (related) projects:https://basex.com/ https://planetarycouncil.org/ https://genesis.re/Get yourself a passport, they increase in price with each purchase, the time is now: genesis.reI’ve been printing (and gifting) money from the future… EDIT: I got myself the domain: “money from the future .com”money...
Mars RobertsonYet another cancellation attempt
What travels faster than light? Memes, culture, rumours… (also the imagination, dreams, telepathy, quantum entanglement, astral plane, higher dimensions, wormholes, non-euclidean geometry)Reputation matters to meSituation is bizarre (on multiple levels)I really wish I could simply “let it go”But the rumours are spreading (small community)Clearly not good for businessThe Hero University pledge: https://draperuniversity.com/pledgeInstant lessonsKnow the full storyContext mattersShow empathyNo m...
Mars Robertson🔥🔥🔥 resume
The most mischievious accomplishments of 2023:1️⃣ Flirting on live TVhttps://twitter.com/GMB/status/1671390548853248003 Dedicated blogpost illustrating the full picture: https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/p849voNdxo21SRUggjVOVNAVY7bwiHkpeMu-8I13z8U2️⃣ Setting the weapons factory on fireI thought there is an ongoing siege and I was planning to jump through the fence and genuinely set it on fire. 100% legal, due to the recent ruling that “saving lives” is a reasonable excuse. https://twitter.com/m...
# Hack the planet(s)
Subscribe to Mars Robertson
Subscribe to Mars Robertson
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Bold opening statement: I’m prepared to die.
Disclaimer: I’ll accomplish more in life by staying alive.
Policy on dying: it was worth it.
Policy on jail: it was worth it.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/14/patrick-thelwell-eggs-king-charles-york
“intended to cause King Charles to believe immediate unlawful violence would be used against him”
Intended to cause to believe.
Pretty cool word soup.
Previously some people got offended and sent me this:
Segway
Transition
Pause
Breather
Shift
Interval
Interlude
Respite
Intermission
Interregnum
Fresh start
New chapter
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658117869316571137
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658497757672267776
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658582102844088321
They took my laptop, they took my phone, so I thought handwritten notes are OK.
I intentionally pixelated it only once, pretty sure future AI will be able to reverse engineer.
(I also have un-pixelated copy on my device)
No. Handwritten notes are also not OK. Some of the jurors could see it and obtain the information they are not meant to have. Trust me, there were procedural nuances.
UK's main export product is language, culture, legal, finance… There are so many obscure rules, and procedures.
"true to the best of my knowledge and belief"
"honest belief in its truth"
"truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"
I could argue that each of these statements brings a different flavor of truth.
If you honestly believe it is true…
Autosuggestions. Delusions. Genuine beliefs. Genuine 🤡
There is a massive difference though:
Witness box. Real-time. Interactivity. Can go deeper.
Written statement. Frozen in time. Impossible to provide “all the truth” upfront, impossible to know which detail is important. That’s why Section 9.
With that said, something that would be a massive game-changer - require lawyers to fact-check the claims of their clients. That would be pretty remarkable.
One of the top Google searches for “duty not to mislead”:
Barristers have their tribunal, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office… I’m wondering if anyone ever landed there for breaking these rules.
I really thought I had super strong, bulletproof, impeccable evidence.
No one looked at my evidence, facts, data, or science.
Concerns, allegations, opinions.
That’s why going to court was one of the most traumatic experiences of my entire life.
That’s why I do what I do - hoping to receive criminal treatment - plausible culpability - not to be mistaken with plausible deniability - something that will achieve a criminal treatment - something that can initiate proceedings - obtaining pieces of paper from one case to win another:
I still want to talk about it.
Just like talking about Hitler:
https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/AOdGZM-rm7X44xR-hkVGk1C4MiBgQEbhqBgRRHJZOb4
Previously I was trying to understand and explain the nuance:
statement of witness
statement of truth
statement under oath
Totally forgot about the position statements:
https://childlawadvice.org.uk/information-pages/writing-a-position-statement/
Child Law Advice - example
https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/get-information/family-law/position-statement/
Rights of Women - example
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part22/pd_part22
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/family/practice_directions/pd_part_17a
Witness statement verified by a statement of truth - I would still prefer if everything was treated as a statement under oath.
I picked two official versions and did some reshuffling, I think the order of the phrases matters. I truly pay attention to detail and differences in quotation marks matter to me as well.
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
And then the problem is - even if I understand the difference - will the court interpret it in the same way?
UPDATE: 19th May 2023
Shared some of my research on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658782363348770816
Maybe I will accomplish a criminal trial then?
Private prosecution against myself, instantiated by some legal entity, apparently I cannot prosecute myself.
Bold opening statement: I’m prepared to die.
Disclaimer: I’ll accomplish more in life by staying alive.
Policy on dying: it was worth it.
Policy on jail: it was worth it.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/14/patrick-thelwell-eggs-king-charles-york
“intended to cause King Charles to believe immediate unlawful violence would be used against him”
Intended to cause to believe.
Pretty cool word soup.
Previously some people got offended and sent me this:
Segway
Transition
Pause
Breather
Shift
Interval
Interlude
Respite
Intermission
Interregnum
Fresh start
New chapter
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658117869316571137
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658497757672267776
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658582102844088321
They took my laptop, they took my phone, so I thought handwritten notes are OK.
I intentionally pixelated it only once, pretty sure future AI will be able to reverse engineer.
(I also have un-pixelated copy on my device)
No. Handwritten notes are also not OK. Some of the jurors could see it and obtain the information they are not meant to have. Trust me, there were procedural nuances.
UK's main export product is language, culture, legal, finance… There are so many obscure rules, and procedures.
"true to the best of my knowledge and belief"
"honest belief in its truth"
"truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"
I could argue that each of these statements brings a different flavor of truth.
If you honestly believe it is true…
Autosuggestions. Delusions. Genuine beliefs. Genuine 🤡
There is a massive difference though:
Witness box. Real-time. Interactivity. Can go deeper.
Written statement. Frozen in time. Impossible to provide “all the truth” upfront, impossible to know which detail is important. That’s why Section 9.
With that said, something that would be a massive game-changer - require lawyers to fact-check the claims of their clients. That would be pretty remarkable.
One of the top Google searches for “duty not to mislead”:
Barristers have their tribunal, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office… I’m wondering if anyone ever landed there for breaking these rules.
I really thought I had super strong, bulletproof, impeccable evidence.
No one looked at my evidence, facts, data, or science.
Concerns, allegations, opinions.
That’s why going to court was one of the most traumatic experiences of my entire life.
That’s why I do what I do - hoping to receive criminal treatment - plausible culpability - not to be mistaken with plausible deniability - something that will achieve a criminal treatment - something that can initiate proceedings - obtaining pieces of paper from one case to win another:
I still want to talk about it.
Just like talking about Hitler:
https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/AOdGZM-rm7X44xR-hkVGk1C4MiBgQEbhqBgRRHJZOb4
Previously I was trying to understand and explain the nuance:
statement of witness
statement of truth
statement under oath
Totally forgot about the position statements:
https://childlawadvice.org.uk/information-pages/writing-a-position-statement/
Child Law Advice - example
https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/get-information/family-law/position-statement/
Rights of Women - example
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part22/pd_part22
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/family/practice_directions/pd_part_17a
Witness statement verified by a statement of truth - I would still prefer if everything was treated as a statement under oath.
I picked two official versions and did some reshuffling, I think the order of the phrases matters. I truly pay attention to detail and differences in quotation marks matter to me as well.
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
And then the problem is - even if I understand the difference - will the court interpret it in the same way?
UPDATE: 19th May 2023
Shared some of my research on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658782363348770816
Maybe I will accomplish a criminal trial then?
Private prosecution against myself, instantiated by some legal entity, apparently I cannot prosecute myself.
No activity yet