Subscribe to HeimLabs
HeimLabsWhy transparency alone isn’t enough for modern blockchains
Blockchain Was Built to Be Transparent and That Strength Needs a Complement
HeimLabsPrediction Markets as Truth Seeking Systems
How markets transform belief into measurable probability
HeimLabsBuild a Whale-Watching On-Chain Analytics Tool with the Coinbase SQL API (Node.js Tutorial)
From concept to code — why the SQL API matters and how to use it to track the biggest transfers on Base.
<100 subscribers
Support HeimLabs
HeimLabsInfoFi is DEAD or not?
HeimLabsWhy transparency alone isn’t enough for modern blockchains
Blockchain Was Built to Be Transparent and That Strength Needs a Complement
HeimLabsPrediction Markets as Truth Seeking Systems
How markets transform belief into measurable probability
HeimLabsBuild a Whale-Watching On-Chain Analytics Tool with the Coinbase SQL API (Node.js Tutorial)
From concept to code — why the SQL API matters and how to use it to track the biggest transfers on Base.
For a while, InfoFi (Information Finance) felt like the next obvious chapter in crypto.
But InfoFi isn’t dead, it’s evolving (and that’s a good thing)
The idea was simple and powerful: If information moves markets, then people who generate high-quality information should be rewarded. Not just influencers with reach but researchers, analysts, builders, and early signal-spotters who consistently add real value.
And honestly, that vision still makes sense.
But what’s changed is this: the first wave of InfoFi wasn’t the final form. A lot of it was experimental, messy, and sometimes misunderstood. So instead of saying “InfoFi is dead,” the more accurate take is:
InfoFi is growing up. The hype phase is fading, and the useful parts are starting to stay.
What InfoFi was trying to solve
Crypto runs on information:
Narratives move liquidity
Research influences conviction
Signals decide entries and exits
Community sentiment drives momentum
Timing matters more than most people admit
Yet most of the value created by information has traditionally been captured by:
Platforms (social media)
Insiders (private groups)
Exchanges (flow)
Loud accounts (distribution)
InfoFi aimed to rebalance that.
The goal wasn’t “financialize tweets.” It was to create a world where: Good information becomes a real economic layer.
Why the first wave struggled
InfoFi faced a few natural challenges, not because it was a bad idea, but because the space is hard.
1) Quality is difficult to measure Information isn’t like a token with a clear price. A research post can stay valuable for weeks or become outdated within hours. Sometimes it’s “right” but too early, and sometimes it’s “wrong” but sparks a useful insight.
So building a fair system that rewards quality (not just popularity) is genuinely complex.
2) Incentives shape behavior Whenever rewards exist, people adapt. That’s not always bad, it’s just reality.
If a platform rewards:
speed → you’ll get faster posting
engagement → you’ll get more viral
confidence → you’ll get stronger opinions
That doesn’t mean InfoFi can’t work. It just means the incentive design matters more than the branding.
3) “Alpha” has a sharing problem Some information loses value the moment it becomes public. That’s not manipulation, it’s just how markets work.
So the best InfoFi systems should support flexible distribution from public posts to gated access so creators can share insights responsibly without assuming every edge must be broadcast instantly.
This keeps your point without making InfoFi sound like “private groups 2.0
What InfoFi got right
Even with the early bumps, InfoFi introduced some important shifts:
Creators started thinking like operators Instead of “posting for clout,” more people began building:
Research brands
Signal products
Gated communities
Dashboards
Onchain analytics services
Markets started valuing signal density People are tired of noise. The demand for “less talk, more signal” is real, and InfoFi helped push that forward.
Crypto began experimenting with reputation as an asset Not perfect yet, but important. Over time, credibility will become measurable through:
Historical accuracy
Transparent track records
Onchain activity
Verifiable credentials
That’s a big step for the space.
What InfoFi is becoming (the next phase)
Instead of “InfoFi is dead,” it’s better to say: InfoFi is moving from hype → infrastructure.
Here’s what the next version looks like:
1) Proof-based information The future isn’t “trust me.” It’s “verify this.”
Info tied to:
Onchain data
Reproducible analysis
Backtesting
Open methodology
wins long term.
2) Public-first, with premium layers
Not everything needs to be fully public immediately but InfoFi wins when the public layer gets smarter.
The strongest systems will combine:
open research that improves public signal quality
optional premium access for deeper or time-sensitive insights
credibility that compounds through transparency over time
The goal isn’t to hide information. It’s to reward real work while keeping public markets healthier.
3) Outcome linked incentives Instead of rewarding posts, systems will reward results:
prediction accuracy over time
performance of a strategy
usefulness measured through outcomes
verifiable contributions
That’s how you avoid “engagement farming.”
4) AI-native signal generation Humans won’t just sell opinions. They’ll sell systems: agents that scan, filter, and execute based on rules.
So the value shifts from: “Who posted first?” to “Who built the best engine?”
The real conclusion : InfoFi isn’t disappearing.
It’s just leaving the “everything is a narrative” phase and entering the “signal + verification” phase.
The first wave proved something important: People want better information markets.
The next wave will make them more sustainable by improving:
incentive design
reputation systems
distribution models
and verification primitives
So no, InfoFi isn’t dead. It’s becoming real.
Revolutionize your business with HeimLabs' blockchain development solutions. Our expert team offers end-to-end services for smart contracts, DApps & more.
Follow HeimLabs for unapologetically practical Web3 dev content.
Twitter, LinkedIn.
For a while, InfoFi (Information Finance) felt like the next obvious chapter in crypto.
But InfoFi isn’t dead, it’s evolving (and that’s a good thing)
The idea was simple and powerful: If information moves markets, then people who generate high-quality information should be rewarded. Not just influencers with reach but researchers, analysts, builders, and early signal-spotters who consistently add real value.
And honestly, that vision still makes sense.
But what’s changed is this: the first wave of InfoFi wasn’t the final form. A lot of it was experimental, messy, and sometimes misunderstood. So instead of saying “InfoFi is dead,” the more accurate take is:
InfoFi is growing up. The hype phase is fading, and the useful parts are starting to stay.
What InfoFi was trying to solve
Crypto runs on information:
Narratives move liquidity
Research influences conviction
Signals decide entries and exits
Community sentiment drives momentum
Timing matters more than most people admit
Yet most of the value created by information has traditionally been captured by:
Platforms (social media)
Insiders (private groups)
Exchanges (flow)
Loud accounts (distribution)
InfoFi aimed to rebalance that.
The goal wasn’t “financialize tweets.” It was to create a world where: Good information becomes a real economic layer.
Why the first wave struggled
InfoFi faced a few natural challenges, not because it was a bad idea, but because the space is hard.
1) Quality is difficult to measure Information isn’t like a token with a clear price. A research post can stay valuable for weeks or become outdated within hours. Sometimes it’s “right” but too early, and sometimes it’s “wrong” but sparks a useful insight.
So building a fair system that rewards quality (not just popularity) is genuinely complex.
2) Incentives shape behavior Whenever rewards exist, people adapt. That’s not always bad, it’s just reality.
If a platform rewards:
speed → you’ll get faster posting
engagement → you’ll get more viral
confidence → you’ll get stronger opinions
That doesn’t mean InfoFi can’t work. It just means the incentive design matters more than the branding.
3) “Alpha” has a sharing problem Some information loses value the moment it becomes public. That’s not manipulation, it’s just how markets work.
So the best InfoFi systems should support flexible distribution from public posts to gated access so creators can share insights responsibly without assuming every edge must be broadcast instantly.
This keeps your point without making InfoFi sound like “private groups 2.0
What InfoFi got right
Even with the early bumps, InfoFi introduced some important shifts:
Creators started thinking like operators Instead of “posting for clout,” more people began building:
Research brands
Signal products
Gated communities
Dashboards
Onchain analytics services
Markets started valuing signal density People are tired of noise. The demand for “less talk, more signal” is real, and InfoFi helped push that forward.
Crypto began experimenting with reputation as an asset Not perfect yet, but important. Over time, credibility will become measurable through:
Historical accuracy
Transparent track records
Onchain activity
Verifiable credentials
That’s a big step for the space.
What InfoFi is becoming (the next phase)
Instead of “InfoFi is dead,” it’s better to say: InfoFi is moving from hype → infrastructure.
Here’s what the next version looks like:
1) Proof-based information The future isn’t “trust me.” It’s “verify this.”
Info tied to:
Onchain data
Reproducible analysis
Backtesting
Open methodology
wins long term.
2) Public-first, with premium layers
Not everything needs to be fully public immediately but InfoFi wins when the public layer gets smarter.
The strongest systems will combine:
open research that improves public signal quality
optional premium access for deeper or time-sensitive insights
credibility that compounds through transparency over time
The goal isn’t to hide information. It’s to reward real work while keeping public markets healthier.
3) Outcome linked incentives Instead of rewarding posts, systems will reward results:
prediction accuracy over time
performance of a strategy
usefulness measured through outcomes
verifiable contributions
That’s how you avoid “engagement farming.”
4) AI-native signal generation Humans won’t just sell opinions. They’ll sell systems: agents that scan, filter, and execute based on rules.
So the value shifts from: “Who posted first?” to “Who built the best engine?”
The real conclusion : InfoFi isn’t disappearing.
It’s just leaving the “everything is a narrative” phase and entering the “signal + verification” phase.
The first wave proved something important: People want better information markets.
The next wave will make them more sustainable by improving:
incentive design
reputation systems
distribution models
and verification primitives
So no, InfoFi isn’t dead. It’s becoming real.
Revolutionize your business with HeimLabs' blockchain development solutions. Our expert team offers end-to-end services for smart contracts, DApps & more.
Follow HeimLabs for unapologetically practical Web3 dev content.
Twitter, LinkedIn.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
1 comment
InfoFi isn’t dead, it’s evolving (and that’s a good thing) Read : https://paragraph.com/@heimlabs/infofi-is-dead-or-not