This article was originally published on June 27th, 2025. Since then, the percentage of presale tokens staked has changed significantly. I have updated those figures, added additional context on how Faircaster works, and added a section which analyzes the net cash flow of all presale participants.
If you need a refresher course before we get clanking, take a look at my Clanker V3.1 deep dive here.
The Faircaster token (ticker: $fair) was launched on Base by @luc on June 26th at 5:48pm EDT. Luc described Faircaster as "an experiment in agent-led capital" that uses its treasury to invest based on social signals on Farcaster. By tracking what top builders ship, fund, and support, the goal for the agent is to provide one-click exposure to the best builders in the Farcaster ecosystem. The token itself was described as a "governance token" where holders are the board and can make decisions to change the rules, shut down the agent, etc. No further details beyond "me + friends" were provided with regards to the team behind the project.
A few days later, Luc provided further details about how Faircaster works under the hood. In summary, Faircaster is a team of specialized agents which are all coordinated by an orchestrator agent. The main tactic used to identify opportunities is tracking casts from users with the "highest network centrality" based on OpenRank scores. These signals are used to inform Faircaster's investment strategy by identifying promising new projects as well as important developments for existing projects.
As noted by Clanker contributor @m00npapi.eth, the deployer configured the parameters of the launch on clanker.world and saved them with a phrase which then triggered the launch:
Total Supply: Total supply of $fair is 100B, further supply cannot be minted.
Creator Vault: Token creators can use the vault feature to lock up a percentage of the token supply (up to 30%) for a predefined amount of time (min. 30 days). For this launch, 30% of the total supply (30B) was locked and sent to ClankerVault at 0x42A95190B4088C88Dd904d930c79deC1158bF09D. These tokens will unlock 30 days after launch on July 27, 2025.
Creator Buy ("dev buy"): Token creators can use the dev buy feature to purchase tokens with their own capital upon launch up to 5 ETH. For this launch, the maximum of 5 ETH was used to acquire ~29.2B $fair which is 29.2% of the 100B total supply or 41.7% of the 70B circulating supply.
Following the launch, Farcaster users like @sekoweed.eth and @bitfloorsghost.eth pointed out that many well-known accounts were allegedly given private presale allocations of $fair later worth up to $70k+ USD. For many, this seemed counterintuitive because Clanker is widely seen as a way to launch fairly in public and bootstrap capital through trading fees.
However, the necessity of raising capital becomes clear when you consider the nature of the project which is essentially agentic capital allocation. Whether that raise should have happened in public vs. private is the main question at hand, not whether raising capital was necessary.
Although no public details have been shared, it appears that presale participants were approached to send ETH to 0xd20CdCcfD6f2Fd0ce8Aa429fc1097D37aB29AA6B between May 20 2025 and June 26 2025 in exchange for $fair presale allocation. There is a clear pattern visible with several 0.25, 0.5, and 1 ETH payments made by both anon and public wallets tied to Farcaster profiles. Some wallets donated more than once, like @waheed who contributed 5 times for a total of 3.25 ETH worth $8416.58 USD at the time that funds were sent.
Three multisigs also participated: 0x4aB...54280, 0xE93...27B1a, and 0x7AF...A4cd7. They contributed 2 ETH ($4834.88 USD), 2 ETH ($4834.88 USD), and 6.75 ETH ($16,318.13 USD) respectively.
In total, 23 ETH was raised worth $56,915.47 USD at the time that funds were sent.
During the launch (tx), 0xb266343E3484cfE09A68372f295b915b60769289 received ~29.2B $fair tokens from the 5 ETH dev buy and proceeded to distribute the tokens to the addresses that contributed to the presale. You can see the corresponding allocation for 0.25, 0.5, and 1 ETH tiers which received 310.8M, 621.6M, and 1.24B tokens respectively. You can also see the three multisigs which received received 2.48B (0x4aB...54280), 2.48B (0xE93...27B1a), and 8.39B (0x7AF...A4cd7) tokens. None of the ~29.2B tokens distributed were locked or vested, so they were freely tradeable once received.
Tokens launched via Clanker accumulate fees from the locked Uniswap V3 1% LP position created upon launch. Since $fair was launched via the clanker.world frontend, the fee split between the token creator and Clanker is 80% / 20% respectively. At the time of writing, 0xb26...69289 has so far claimed ~11.14 WETH ($33.5k USD) and ~732.73M $fair ($23.8k USD). There are six transactions in total which call the claimRewards function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Please note that @luc's presale allocation of 463.01M tokens was the only non-multisig allocation which differed from the standard amounts of 310.8M, 621.6M, and 1.24B tokens (or multiples thereof). This surplus of 152,201,614.74 $fair closely matches the first Clanker rewards claim of 152,201,611.46 $fair. As a result, 0xb26...69289 currently holds ~580.53M $fair rather than the total amount claimed of ~732.73M $fair.
@luc posted an update at 5:13pm EDT on June 27 2025 stating that all early investors locked their allocation for 6 months. It is unclear whether this step was taken in response to criticism or whether this was the intended course of action all along. This post also clarified why capital was raised in the presale, stating that "first buyers funded the agent for everyone."
According to @itsbasil, these lockups were done via Hedgey Finance which is a tool for token vesting, investor lockups, grants, etc. At the time of writing, ~26.28B $fair tokens have been locked via Hedgey. Out of the ~29.2B presale tokens, this leaves ~2.9B unlocked at the time of writing. In other words, 89.94% of the ~29.2B presale tokens are locked. If you include the 152.2M extra tokens sent to @luc in the presale total, 89.48% of the ~29.3B presale tokens are locked.
These locks expire on December 27, 2025 at 7am EST. You can verify this by calling the planEnd read function on the VotingTokenLockupPlans (VTLP) contract and entering the token ID of the ERC-721 minted at the time of lockup. This will return a Unix timestamp which you can then convert to your local timezone. So far, 24 tokens have been minted beginning with ID 11 through to ID 34. Previous lockup tokens minted relate to other tokens which are likely tests or unrelated.
I have divided the presale participants into two groups based on what % of their presale tokens are locked: Group A (≥95%) and Group B (≤85%).
Wallet shows the address used by presale participants to lock their tokens, which in some cases may differ from the wallet used to send ETH to 0xd20...9AA6B and receive presale tokens.
Presale buy shows the total amount of ETH sent to 0xd20...9AA6B in exchange for presale allocation. USD value is calculated at the time the payment was made.
Presale allocation shows the total amount of tokens received in exchange. In some cases tokens were received at another address and then transferred.
Tokens locked and % shows the total amount of tokens locked via Hedgey.
Net tokens bought/sold shows the amount of tokens bought or sold by presale participants. If the number is positive, they bought more tokens than they sold. If the number is negative, they sold more tokens than they bought.
Net cash flow shows the net profit from token sales minus the amount contributed to the presale. In other words, including the presale buy, did the participant lose or make money? If $fair was traded for assets other than ETH, only the WETH value of the trade was used and subsequent gains or losses were not accounted for in this calculation.
Group A: ≥95% presale allocation locked
Group B: ≤85% presale allocation locked
A few additional notes on the above:
Only three presale participants have a positive net cash flow: @azflin, @waheed, and 0xbCE...a1311.
@luc did not send ETH to 0xd20...9AA6B so it is impossible to determine his cost basis (if any).
Although @sidshekhar only locked 67.26% of his tokens, it is worth noting that he instead decided to distribute them via Noice tipping.
Presale participants may have bought or sold tokens from side wallets which are not accounted for in the above analysis of public wallets.
The data above is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of publishing but may become inaccurate over time as participants lock/unlock or buy/sell tokens. Please do your own research and form your own conclusions.
Launching tokens is never easy, but here are a few takeaways from the events surrounding $fair:
There are valid reasons to conduct a presale or private round for your project. An agent that invests needs capital to invest, a point well articulated by @woj. And as mentioned by @six, having control over your cap table is also valuable.
However, you should disclose this arrangement whenever possible. Otherwise, you risk not being on the same page with the broader community that may want to support your project.
If you're proud of your early partners they should be a selling point, not a secret. If you're reticent to reveal how you structured the raise, that likely points to flaws that you should address.
Distribution is valuable, but so is transparency. It is much easier to maintain trust than to rebuild it following a PR fumble. Comms deserves equal prioritization alongside cap tables.
I have done my best to summarize the events surrounding the launch of Faircaster and the $fair token, but there may be missing details or context from the above analysis. Please do your own research and form your own conclusions.
I wish @luc and everyone else involved with Faircaster the very best going forward. Despite some stumbles with the launch, I do not believe that they had any bad intentions and will be following the project closely.
Share Dialog
matthewb
Excellent research
Anyone have a good overview on $FAIR tokenomics or holdings? Love the concept in principle - want to get a deeper understanding of how it works under the hood (i.e. how new investments are made, what's being held, how it ties back to FAIR etc etc)
don't think there is any relationship atm between $fair (the token) and potential appreciation of assets held by the agent. so far capital has been deployed to buy $noice, $qr, and $opsys, all of which are at least +100% since their entry. that said, you may find my article about the token launch interesting which unpacks the presale and subsequent token lockups: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster
The best review imo
appreciate that brix, thank you 16900 $betr
afaik there is no direct value accrual from the investments into $fair Also, I didn't succeed yet to get attention of @luc re access to the AI Agent swarm bc that would be gud token utility All I know is that it's a government token and that holders (now? / future?) act as a "board" aiding with investment decisions
I think 2 cliff unlocks coming. But other than that not too sure tbh. Been a work in progress. Interested to learn more as well. @luc @itsbasil (don’t know how much basil 🌿 knows. But it’s a knowledgeable plant. 🌱)
december is presale unlock i believe @matthewb wrote on FAIR
indeed https://farcaster.xyz/matthewb/0xe7ea2e2f
3333 $betr thanks 🙏
Following along: @cstkpr save this
Hope @luc see this
Need your support
$FAIR ıs the best ın @farcaster
I have just published a revised and expanded version of my report on the @faircaster token launch ($fair) via @paragraph. the article has been coined and by supporting my research you'll receive tokens in return. read it here: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster for those who would rather read a very long cast, here is a summary: OVERVIEW The Faircaster token (ticker: $fair) was launched on Base by @luc on June 26th at 5:48pm EDT. Luc described Faircaster as "an experiment in agent-led capital" that uses its treasury to invest based on social signals on Farcaster. https://farcaster.xyz/luc/0x776781bc A few days later, Luc provided further details about how Faircaster works under the hood. In summary, Faircaster is a team of specialized agents which are all coordinated by an orchestrator agent. The main tactic used to identify opportunities is tracking casts from users with the "highest network centrality" based on @openrank scores. https://farcaster.xyz/luc/0x09125bd7 LAUNCH PARAMETERS As noted by Clanker contributor @m00npapi.eth, the deployer configured the parameters of the launch on clanker.world and saved them with a phrase which then triggered the launch: • Total Supply: Total supply of $fair is 100B, further supply cannot be minted. • Creator Vault: Token creators can use the vault feature to lock up a percentage of the token supply (up to 30%) for a predefined amount of time (min. 30 days). For this launch, 30% of the total supply (30B) was locked and sent to ClankerVault at 0x42A95190B4088C88Dd904d930c79deC1158bF09D. These tokens will unlock 30 days after launch on July 27, 2025. • Creator Buy ("dev buy"): Token creators can use the dev buy feature to purchase tokens with their own capital upon launch up to 5 ETH. For this launch, the maximum of 5 ETH was used to acquire ~29.2B $fair which is 29.2% of the 100B total supply or 41.7% of the 70B circulating supply. Launch tx: https://basescan.org/tx/0x6bc05e8ea8e247a808e3603677a506a49657e4678a80b29bf8ee213f453c30e6 PRESALE CONTROVERSY Following the launch, Farcaster users like @sekoweed.eth and @bitfloorsghost.eth pointed out that many well-known accounts were allegedly given private presale allocations of $fair later worth up to $70k+ USD. For many, this seemed counterintuitive because Clanker is widely seen as a way to launch fairly in public and bootstrap capital through trading fees. https://farcaster.xyz/sekoweed.eth/0x02b436c1 https://farcaster.xyz/bitfloorsghost.eth/0x074be03d However, the necessity of raising capital becomes clear when you consider the nature of the project which is essentially agentic capital allocation. Whether that raise should have happened in public vs. private is the main question at hand, not whether raising capital was necessary. Although no public details have been shared, it appears that presale participants were approached to send ETH to 0xd20CdCcfD6f2Fd0ce8Aa429fc1097D37aB29AA6B between May 20 2025 and June 26 2025 in exchange for $fair presale allocation. There is a clear pattern visible with several 0.25, 0.5, and 1 ETH payments made by both anon and public wallets tied to Farcaster profiles. Some wallets donated more than once, like @waheed who contributed 5 times for a total of 3.25 ETH worth $8416.58 USD at the time that funds were sent. https://basescan.org/address/0xd20cdccfd6f2fd0ce8aa429fc1097d37ab29aa6b Three multisigs also participated: 0x4aB...54280, 0xE93...27B1a, and 0x7AF...A4cd7. They contributed 2 ETH ($4834.88 USD), 2 ETH ($4834.88 USD), and 6.75 ETH ($16,318.13 USD) respectively. https://basescan.org/address/0xd20cdccfd6f2fd0ce8aa429fc1097d37ab29aa6b#internaltx In total, 23 ETH was raised worth $56,915.47 USD at the time that funds were sent. During the launch, 0xb266343E3484cfE09A68372f295b915b60769289 received ~29.2B $fair tokens from the 5 ETH dev buy and proceeded to distribute the tokens to the addresses that contributed to the presale. You can see the corresponding allocation for 0.25, 0.5, and 1 ETH tiers which received 310.8M, 621.6M, and 1.24B tokens respectively. You can also see the three multisigs which received received 2.48B (0x4aB...54280), 2.48B (0xE93...27B1a), and 8.39B (0x7AF...A4cd7) tokens. None of the ~29.2B tokens distributed were locked or vested, so they were freely tradeable once received. https://basescan.org/token/0x7d928816cc9c462dd7adef911de41535e444cb07?a=0xb266343E3484cfE09A68372f295b915b60769289 Tokens launched via Clanker accumulate fees from the locked Uniswap V3 1% LP position created upon launch. Since $fair was launched via the clanker.world frontend, the fee split between the token creator and Clanker is 80% / 20% respectively. At the time of writing, 0xb26...69289 has so far claimed ~11.14 WETH ($33.5k USD) and ~732.73M $fair ($23.8k USD). There are six transactions in total which call the claimRewards function. Please note that Luc's presale allocation of 463.01M tokens was the only non-multisig allocation which differed from the standard amounts of 310.8M, 621.6M, and 1.24B tokens (or multiples thereof). This surplus of 152,201,614.74 $fair closely matches the first Clanker rewards claim of 152,201,611.46 $fair. As a result, 0xb26...69289 currently holds ~580.53M $fair rather than the total amount claimed of ~732.73M $fair. TOKEN LOCKUPS Luc posted an update at 5:13pm EDT on June 27 2025 stating that all early investors locked their allocation for 6 months. It is unclear whether this step was taken in response to criticism or whether this was the intended course of action all along. This post also clarified why capital was raised in the presale, stating that "first buyers funded the agent for everyone." https://farcaster.xyz/luc/0xd9fa35f6 These lockups were done via Hedgey Finance which is a tool for token vesting, investor lockups, grants, etc. At the time of writing, ~26.28B $fair tokens have been locked via Hedgey. Out of the ~29.2B presale tokens, this leaves ~2.9B unlocked at the time of writing. In other words, 89.94% of the ~29.2B presale tokens are locked. If you include the 152.2M extra tokens sent to Luc in the presale total, 89.48% of the ~29.3B presale tokens are locked. https://basescan.org/token/0x7d928816cc9c462dd7adef911de41535e444cb07?a=0x73cd8626b3cd47b009e68380720cfe6679a3ec3d These locks expire on December 27, 2025 at 7am EST. You can verify this by calling the planEnd read function on the VotingTokenLockupPlans (VTLP) contract and entering the token ID of the ERC-721 minted at the time of lockup. https://basescan.org/token/0x73cd8626b3cd47b009e68380720cfe6679a3ec3d#readContract POST-LAUNCH TRADING ANALYSIS I have divided the presale participants into two groups based on what % of their presale tokens are locked: Group A (≥95%) and Group B (≤85%). • Wallet shows the address used by presale participants to lock their tokens, which in some cases may differ from the wallet used to send ETH to 0xd20...9AA6B and receive presale tokens. • Presale Buy shows the total amount of ETH sent to 0xd20...9AA6B in exchange for presale allocation. USD value is calculated at the time the payment was made. • Presale Allocation shows the total amount of tokens received in exchange. In some cases tokens were received at another address and then transferred. • Tokens Locked and % shows the total amount of tokens locked via Hedgey. • Net Tokens Bought/Sold shows the amount of tokens bought or sold by presale participants. If the number is positive, they bought more tokens than they sold. If the number is negative, they sold more tokens than they bought. • Net Cash Flow shows the net profit from token sales minus the amount contributed to the presale. In other words, including the presale buy, did the participant lose or make money? If $fair was traded for assets other than ETH, only the WETH value of the trade was used and subsequent gains or losses were not accounted for in this calculation. You can see these tables in the article: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster • Only three presale participants have a positive net cash flow: @azflin (13.55 ETH / $32,547.56 USD), @waheed (8.45 ETH / $19,898.89 USD), and 0xbCE...a1311 (2.92 ETH / $7064.00 USD). • Luc did not send ETH to 0xd20...9AA6B so it is impossible to determine his cost basis (if any). • Although @sidshekhar only locked 67.26% of his tokens, it is worth noting that he instead decided to distribute them via Noice tipping: https://farcaster.xyz/sidshekhar/0xc6fc1630 • Presale participants may have bought or sold tokens from side wallets which are not accounted for in the above analysis of public wallets. • The data above is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of publishing but may become inaccurate over time as participants lock/unlock or buy/sell tokens. Please do your own research and form your own conclusions. TAKEAWAYS Launching tokens is never easy, but here are a few takeaways from the events surrounding $fair: • There are valid reasons to conduct a presale or private round for your project. An agent that invests needs capital to invest, a point well articulated by @woj (https://farcaster.xyz/woj/0x3d949d82). And as mentioned by @six (https://farcaster.xyz/six/0xbb73d9f6), having control over your cap table is also valuable. • However, you should disclose this arrangement whenever possible. Otherwise, you risk not being on the same page with the broader community that may want to support your project. • If you're proud of your early partners they should be a selling point, not a secret. If you're reticent to reveal how you structured the raise, that likely points to flaws that you should address. • Distribution is valuable, but so is transparency. It is much easier to maintain trust than to rebuild it following a PR fumble. Comms deserves equal prioritization alongside cap tables.
CONCLUSION I have done my best to summarize the events surrounding the launch of Faircaster and the $fair token, but there may be missing details or context from the above analysis. Please do your own research and form your own conclusions. I wish @luc and everyone else involved with Faircaster the very best going forward. Despite some stumbles with the launch, I do not believe that they had any bad intentions and will be following the project closely.
read the full article on @paragraph: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster
Really solid analysis! Appreciate it! 1234 $tipn
Awesome analysis! 1000 $TIPN
thank you pichi 💜
matthew on his xbt arc
5000 $tipn
thank you sonya 💜
Really solid analysis Appreciate you taking the time My disappointment was these metrics were not disclosed at launch. Would love a presale bot for clankers that auto disclosed the presale price. I’ll stay sidelined on $FAIR for the time being; though appreciate the hedgey lock. Did you look into any possible connections for early snipers or sized buys right out the gate, would only assume many presalers were double dipping. ty 25000 $Degen
really appreciate that, thank you! I think it’s a good learning moment for clanker folks since the in-feed deploy didn’t really give everyone a good sense of the 5 ETH dev buy + 30% 30-day lock and what that might mean for the tokenomics. of course you could figure all that out if you looked closely, but was it clear to a casual observer? probably not, so there’s still some work to do. maybe we need a more informative bot reply or miniapp preview image. I haven’t done any wallet cluster analysis so can’t confirm or deny re: side wallets, but this seems to be common practice so wouldn’t surprise me.
also, perhaps not obvious based on my reply above but comms should have been clear and transparent from the start. those issues go beyond clanker.
Meant to tag @dish @lobstermindset.eth Know it shouldn’t be your role as Clanker, yet would be cool to have an easy way to see pre but or denote this token launched with a presale in the future
we’re putting more time into reviewing launch and communication plans with teams who reach out. we have been putting together examples and case studies to help people, idk if we have that stuff public tho more information seems to always be better than less
You have good analytical skills.
great summary, well done, supported
Great article, thanks for sharing your analysis! Now I need to think about new clankers and presales more, and decided what to do with my $fair tokens.. 1000 $tipn
Great read. Very well written. Dunno what it is, but I really like your fact delivery style.
In a recent blog post, Matthew B provides an in-depth analysis of Faircaster's token launch, advising on the complexities of presale arrangements and the importance of transparency. Key updates include net cash flow insights and adjustments to numbers since launch. Follow @matthewb for the latest insights!
here's another real world peek at Farcaster's grok equivalent: if you have access to our agent, you can answer these questions - it could speak about the $fair launch yesterday as the discussions were happening if you don't have access yet, it's because sometimes it still hallucinates and we are working on that before broader rollout soon https://farcaster.xyz/pichi/0xb2f2144c
If I downvote and correct it, does that do anything? Last week it told me to plead my case in channels that dont exist.
Yeah downvoting and correcting is great!
Woot! Glad to know it learns!
super cool
mini app link? Would love to try it out!
slow rollout rn, will share more soon
this is great, nice work! would be cool if it could reference content made by community members about a given topic, e.g. my article about $fair: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster-post-mortem
yeah that's in the works
hell yeah. will write something about it once it’s live.
Uuuuuh👀 I would love to get access🖤 Also sorry for not having reported feedback yet but kinda busy weekend, will do soon enough🥲🖤
Would you love to drop rish voice feedback, lesser activation energy than typing
can i get access?
Dope!
nice!
Based and much needed 👍
good one conclusion is wrong imo
> call token $fair because FARcaster + AI + provides fair access to new startups who would otherwise raise from a vc. good name > raise small amount of money from friends so there is capital to invest > launch token and give some of it to people who gave you money > expect token to trade low, token instead teleports to 5m > everyone thinks you’re running some weird presale extraction scam wth FAIR in the name everyone needs to calm down, @luc could launch it better but there is no conspiracy here
fwiw at the time of writing this i didn't know some people actually sold https://farcaster.xyz/thebestpizza.eth/0xe3a8ca21
Everyone else did though. You’re 2 days late to the cadaver. 30 min after launch people were punting. (I don’t care the size or reason)
It’s worth $0 lol
didnt yall call it the next degen? but at the same time expected it not to teleport? and some of the folks that did presale were hard shilling it to their followers here and on CT without disclosing they had participated in a private presale
bro give me a CA and i’ll call it the next degen for you
lol
I'll take that proposition the next degen is hella thirsty 0x33fc59a2c3c3b7a9532ef0b5476c20892a75eb49
😭😭😭🤣
correct me if i'm wrong pls
You should consider buying $Monk Monkeyhaircut. It’s the next degen but with way more memetic flywheel.
Launch couldve been better if there’s transparency and such. Still, congrats woj! 👏
do it https://farcaster.xyz/anemale.eth/0x88851371
don’t think there were any malicious intentions, but definitely a few things to learn from the whole thing. I wrote an article about what happened: https://paragraph.com/@matthewb/faircaster-post-mortem
thanks for the clarification, I was confused that it meant a fair launch (oops) I will stop presenting it has ever been as such
I like that it reminds me of safemoon
I’m sad because it’s faircaster because of the AI agent and not because of the idea of being FAIR.
call it $Unfair https://www.clanker.world/clanker/0x2E40D88b2bFc31F3f6789ca04025Bc3dB62ECB07
You’re so full of shit 🤣