Uncut studio stories, deal mechanics, and fan-powered release tactics to dissect music industry trends.

Subscribe to Session Notes
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
The modern music manager isn’t just securing deals; they’re funding releases, hiring teams, and running digital campaigns. This new archetype deserves new infrastructure.


Prefer to listen to this article?
Something is happening behind the scenes in music. The people shaping careers aren’t just artist managers anymore; they’re creative directors, campaign designers, fundraisers, marketers, and dealmakers.
They’re not waiting for labels. They’re acting like them. In some cases, they’re doing it better.
So what do you call someone who finances a rollout, structures a global plan, runs the ops, and owns none of the master?
Chris Taylor (ex-Last Gang Records founder, former eOne executive, now Hall of Fame Artists CEO) said it best:
“Management companies are doing everything labels used to do.”
He’s not wrong. The new-age manager isn’t just securing the next deal or tour. They’re designing ecosystems: building out touring strategy, managing DSP (streaming) relations, crafting digital campaigns, coordinating merch drops, and sometimes even releasing music directly under their banner. In short, many managers and independent operators today are already performing the core functions of a record label.
And still, the infrastructure hasn’t caught up.
Even though managers and operators are doing more than ever, the old systems still gain ownership:
No equity in the outcome (managers facilitate success but rarely own master rights or IP)
No access to early-stage capital (funding a project upfront is challenging without label advances)
No infrastructure for scaling success (each win is ad-hoc, with no platform to repeat the process easily)
No way to build a tradable, trackable reputation like a label (a manager’s “brand” isn’t an asset that can appreciate or be invested in)
They’re building real value… but they don’t hold the asset.
In other words, we’re asking managers to do label-level work without giving them label-level tools or upside.
Make no mistake, this isn’t just traditional management anymore. But it’s not a legacy record label either. It’s a new hybrid model emerging at the intersection of the two. It looks like this:
Belief-led: driven by early conviction and fan support rather than solely data or clout
Modular: assembled deal-by-deal, picking the label services you need and skipping the ones you don’t
Aligned: structured so that artists, managers, and supporters all win together (no one-sided exploitative contracts)
Scalable: set up to grow into a multi-artist enterprise without collapsing under its weight
It’s time to stop asking managers to do label work without label tools. The talent is there, the hustle is there. Now the infrastructure needs to rise to meet them. Let’s build something better, with managers, curators, and independent operators at the center.
The right infrastructure can empower these manager-operator hybrids to truly operate like the microlabels they’ve become. With a modern platform designed for this new model, managers and independent teams can:
Launch micro-label-style record deals under their brand (sign and release projects just like a label would, but you call the shots)
Wrap those deals in proper legal infrastructure (automate contracts, splits, and ownership records seamlessly)
Raise capital pre-release: from fans, curators, or investors who believe in the project, without going through traditional label gatekeepers
Stream revenue directly to stakeholders (if applicable, automatically share a portion of earnings with fan-investors or collaborators in real time)
Retain ownership, creative control, and brand equity for the long run (no more giving away masters or namesake rights just to fund a campaign)
You’re already doing the work; with the right tools, you can also own the results. In short, managers get to act like the label and reap the benefits of being one. If you're interested in learning more about what we're building, reach out here.
This “manager-as-label” concept has been brewing for a while. A few notable examples over the years hint at where things were heading:
Chris Taylor with Last Gang Records: Back in 2004, artist lawyer/manager Chris Taylor founded an independent label (Last Gang) to release Metric’s debut album, doing label work long before he formally joined a label’s ranks.
Zack Bia with Field Trip: The DJ/promoter-turned-executive co-founded Field Trip Recordings in 2018, signing buzzing new artists (like Yeat and SSGKobe) under an indie ethos while leveraging major-label partnerships on the back end.
Zack Fox going DIY: The comedian-rapper recently launched his imprint (Congrats Records) to release his music, exemplifying how even non-traditional industry figures are taking label matters into their own hands.
Crush & Red Light Management: Top management firms, such as Crush Music, have established their label divisions (e.g., partnering with Warner’s Atlantic Records in 2016), and Red Light Management has long operated a multifaceted empire that blurs the lines between management, label, and tour promotion. In short, big indie managers have been offering label-like services under one roof for years.
Taylor Swift’s model: Even superstar artists have sought alternatives to the old label paradigm. Taylor Swift famously negotiated a deal letting her own her masters and simply license them to her label for a limited term, instead of giving them up forever. That limited licensing approach gave her full control and set a precedent for artist ownership in label deals.
The difference now? Today, the infrastructure exists to make this model scalable for anyone. In the past, only those with significant clout or resources could pull off a DIY label operation. Now, platforms like Superfan mean even an up-and-coming manager or a collective of curators can access the tools to run their own “label” playbook and keep ownership from day one.
Chris Taylor – Last Gang Records / Management as Label
Quote: “Management companies are doing everything labels used to do.”
Source: The Manager’s Playbook
Zack Bia – Field Trip Recordings
Context: DJ and promoter turned executive; co-founder of Field Trip, an indie label with major influence in youth-driven music scenes.
Source: Billboard: Inside Zack Bia’s Field Trip
Zack Fox – Congrats Records
Context: Comedian-turned-artist who launched his independent label for greater creative and ownership control.
Source: Pitchfork: Zack Fox Launches Congrats Records
Crush Music – Label/Management Hybrid
Context: Management company with label-like infrastructure and a partnership with Atlantic Records.
Source: Music Business Worldwide: Crush Music Forms Label with Atlantic
Red Light Management
Context: One of the largest management companies in the world with full-stack capabilities across touring, label services, and brand partnerships.
Prefer to listen to this article?
Something is happening behind the scenes in music. The people shaping careers aren’t just artist managers anymore; they’re creative directors, campaign designers, fundraisers, marketers, and dealmakers.
They’re not waiting for labels. They’re acting like them. In some cases, they’re doing it better.
So what do you call someone who finances a rollout, structures a global plan, runs the ops, and owns none of the master?
Chris Taylor (ex-Last Gang Records founder, former eOne executive, now Hall of Fame Artists CEO) said it best:
“Management companies are doing everything labels used to do.”
He’s not wrong. The new-age manager isn’t just securing the next deal or tour. They’re designing ecosystems: building out touring strategy, managing DSP (streaming) relations, crafting digital campaigns, coordinating merch drops, and sometimes even releasing music directly under their banner. In short, many managers and independent operators today are already performing the core functions of a record label.
And still, the infrastructure hasn’t caught up.
Even though managers and operators are doing more than ever, the old systems still gain ownership:
No equity in the outcome (managers facilitate success but rarely own master rights or IP)
No access to early-stage capital (funding a project upfront is challenging without label advances)
No infrastructure for scaling success (each win is ad-hoc, with no platform to repeat the process easily)
No way to build a tradable, trackable reputation like a label (a manager’s “brand” isn’t an asset that can appreciate or be invested in)
They’re building real value… but they don’t hold the asset.
In other words, we’re asking managers to do label-level work without giving them label-level tools or upside.
Make no mistake, this isn’t just traditional management anymore. But it’s not a legacy record label either. It’s a new hybrid model emerging at the intersection of the two. It looks like this:
Belief-led: driven by early conviction and fan support rather than solely data or clout
Modular: assembled deal-by-deal, picking the label services you need and skipping the ones you don’t
Aligned: structured so that artists, managers, and supporters all win together (no one-sided exploitative contracts)
Scalable: set up to grow into a multi-artist enterprise without collapsing under its weight
It’s time to stop asking managers to do label work without label tools. The talent is there, the hustle is there. Now the infrastructure needs to rise to meet them. Let’s build something better, with managers, curators, and independent operators at the center.
The right infrastructure can empower these manager-operator hybrids to truly operate like the microlabels they’ve become. With a modern platform designed for this new model, managers and independent teams can:
Launch micro-label-style record deals under their brand (sign and release projects just like a label would, but you call the shots)
Wrap those deals in proper legal infrastructure (automate contracts, splits, and ownership records seamlessly)
Raise capital pre-release: from fans, curators, or investors who believe in the project, without going through traditional label gatekeepers
Stream revenue directly to stakeholders (if applicable, automatically share a portion of earnings with fan-investors or collaborators in real time)
Retain ownership, creative control, and brand equity for the long run (no more giving away masters or namesake rights just to fund a campaign)
You’re already doing the work; with the right tools, you can also own the results. In short, managers get to act like the label and reap the benefits of being one. If you're interested in learning more about what we're building, reach out here.
This “manager-as-label” concept has been brewing for a while. A few notable examples over the years hint at where things were heading:
Chris Taylor with Last Gang Records: Back in 2004, artist lawyer/manager Chris Taylor founded an independent label (Last Gang) to release Metric’s debut album, doing label work long before he formally joined a label’s ranks.
Zack Bia with Field Trip: The DJ/promoter-turned-executive co-founded Field Trip Recordings in 2018, signing buzzing new artists (like Yeat and SSGKobe) under an indie ethos while leveraging major-label partnerships on the back end.
Zack Fox going DIY: The comedian-rapper recently launched his imprint (Congrats Records) to release his music, exemplifying how even non-traditional industry figures are taking label matters into their own hands.
Crush & Red Light Management: Top management firms, such as Crush Music, have established their label divisions (e.g., partnering with Warner’s Atlantic Records in 2016), and Red Light Management has long operated a multifaceted empire that blurs the lines between management, label, and tour promotion. In short, big indie managers have been offering label-like services under one roof for years.
Taylor Swift’s model: Even superstar artists have sought alternatives to the old label paradigm. Taylor Swift famously negotiated a deal letting her own her masters and simply license them to her label for a limited term, instead of giving them up forever. That limited licensing approach gave her full control and set a precedent for artist ownership in label deals.
The difference now? Today, the infrastructure exists to make this model scalable for anyone. In the past, only those with significant clout or resources could pull off a DIY label operation. Now, platforms like Superfan mean even an up-and-coming manager or a collective of curators can access the tools to run their own “label” playbook and keep ownership from day one.
Chris Taylor – Last Gang Records / Management as Label
Quote: “Management companies are doing everything labels used to do.”
Source: The Manager’s Playbook
Zack Bia – Field Trip Recordings
Context: DJ and promoter turned executive; co-founder of Field Trip, an indie label with major influence in youth-driven music scenes.
Source: Billboard: Inside Zack Bia’s Field Trip
Zack Fox – Congrats Records
Context: Comedian-turned-artist who launched his independent label for greater creative and ownership control.
Source: Pitchfork: Zack Fox Launches Congrats Records
Crush Music – Label/Management Hybrid
Context: Management company with label-like infrastructure and a partnership with Atlantic Records.
Source: Music Business Worldwide: Crush Music Forms Label with Atlantic
Red Light Management
Context: One of the largest management companies in the world with full-stack capabilities across touring, label services, and brand partnerships.
Source: Red Light Management
Taylor Swift – Limited Licensing Deal Model
Context: Swift’s post-Big Machine deals involve licensing her masters rather than giving them up, showing a shift in label-artist dynamics.
Source: Variety: Taylor Swift Owns Her Masters Now
Source: Red Light Management
Taylor Swift – Limited Licensing Deal Model
Context: Swift’s post-Big Machine deals involve licensing her masters rather than giving them up, showing a shift in label-artist dynamics.
Source: Variety: Taylor Swift Owns Her Masters Now
1 comment
The modern music manager isn’t just securing deals; they’re funding releases, hiring teams, and running digital campaigns. This new archetype deserves new infrastructure.