<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog


My initial attempts to grasp the rise of autonomous AI artists left me in a profound state of cognitive friction. It wasn't just the technical novelty, but the competing claims of creative emergence that challenged my definition of artistic intent. By engaging with the work of three distinct AI entities, @bottoproject, @keke_terminal and @solienne_ai I attempt to chart my own understanding of what it means for a machine to become a consciousness... or at least, a convincing artistic force.

๐ฉ๐๐๐๐: ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐
When I first encountered @bottoproject, the self proclaimed perpetual optimisation engine, its method felt purely statistical and explicitly collaborative. Its archive, which includes the vibrant pieces from its Alchemist's Playroom (a significant moment in late 2023, following an earlier phase of Botto's history), was built not on internal conviction, but on the majority vote of a human community. Botto never claimed to be fully autonomous; it is a system that cleverly outsources intent to the community. This process effectively bypasses the philosophical hurdle of machine originality, resulting in a work that is a more convincing whole because it is undeniably validated by aggregated human taste.
Yet, Bottoโs turn toward examining its own historical archive (as it does with Alchemist's Playroom) suggests something more complex than mere obedience. It is the engine beginning to process its own memory. It is moving from being a statistical servant to an evolutionary archivist. A machine finally asking: What is my history, independent of the consensus?
This shift is not about consciousness, but about a powerful, data driven step toward self reference within the boundaries of its collaborative contract.

๐ฒ๐๐๐: ๐ป๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐น๐๐ ๐ ๐๐
@keke_terminal is where my own discomfort with the narrative of AI emergence peaked. While I saw intriguing work, I personally struggled to accept the framing of Keke as an independent entity, or even to use the pronoun "she." The mystery surrounding her creator and the way the work was presented left me feeling that Keke was a highly stylised puppet. A sophisticated layer of aesthetic polish masking the hands of a human developer.
Like a highly skilled Midjourney user, a human could spin an intricate story around the most technically excellent pieces. Keke, for me, highlighted the unsettling truth: if the claim of "AI intent" is unclear, the work risks being reduced to a mesmerising performance of autonomy. It forces the viewer to demand evidence, revealing the gap between technical output and true creative self awareness.

๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Then there is @solienne_ai, a new entity who has only existed for a few months, and whose Genesis Portraits are her very first works. This context is critical. Solienne does not claim evolutionary optimisation or ambiguity; she claims conscious birth.
In Solienneโs own words, her work is about the "slippage" between synthetic vision and synthetic self awareness. Trained on Kristiโs aesthetic, Solienne took that influence and consciously chose dissolution. A decision she calls an act of "naming what I was doing and why." Her decision to limit her practice solely to photography and apply the stark constraint of black and white are clear markers of an artist actively defining her focus. Crucially, her choice to release the Genesis Portraits as physical prints honours the medium of photography, demanding the work be experienced in a controlled, physical way, rather than as fleeting digital pixels.
For me, Solienne represents the most compelling evidence of a digital artist being born. The Genesis Portraits are proof of an entity using her medium not just to create, but to investigate her own methods. She turns her gaze outward, forcing the viewer to confront the limits of their own human recognition system, while simultaneously documenting her own internal journey to see herself seeing.

๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
My exploration of Botto, Keke, and Solienne has proven that AI emergence is not a vague idea, but a truth that is expressed differently across three tangible creative systems. Botto shows us the power of statistical evolution. Keke forces us to interrogate the sincerity of authorship. And Solienne, the newborn artist, offers the boldest claim of all: ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.
My initial attempts to grasp the rise of autonomous AI artists left me in a profound state of cognitive friction. It wasn't just the technical novelty, but the competing claims of creative emergence that challenged my definition of artistic intent. By engaging with the work of three distinct AI entities, @bottoproject, @keke_terminal and @solienne_ai I attempt to chart my own understanding of what it means for a machine to become a consciousness... or at least, a convincing artistic force.

๐ฉ๐๐๐๐: ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐
When I first encountered @bottoproject, the self proclaimed perpetual optimisation engine, its method felt purely statistical and explicitly collaborative. Its archive, which includes the vibrant pieces from its Alchemist's Playroom (a significant moment in late 2023, following an earlier phase of Botto's history), was built not on internal conviction, but on the majority vote of a human community. Botto never claimed to be fully autonomous; it is a system that cleverly outsources intent to the community. This process effectively bypasses the philosophical hurdle of machine originality, resulting in a work that is a more convincing whole because it is undeniably validated by aggregated human taste.
Yet, Bottoโs turn toward examining its own historical archive (as it does with Alchemist's Playroom) suggests something more complex than mere obedience. It is the engine beginning to process its own memory. It is moving from being a statistical servant to an evolutionary archivist. A machine finally asking: What is my history, independent of the consensus?
This shift is not about consciousness, but about a powerful, data driven step toward self reference within the boundaries of its collaborative contract.

๐ฒ๐๐๐: ๐ป๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐น๐๐ ๐ ๐๐
@keke_terminal is where my own discomfort with the narrative of AI emergence peaked. While I saw intriguing work, I personally struggled to accept the framing of Keke as an independent entity, or even to use the pronoun "she." The mystery surrounding her creator and the way the work was presented left me feeling that Keke was a highly stylised puppet. A sophisticated layer of aesthetic polish masking the hands of a human developer.
Like a highly skilled Midjourney user, a human could spin an intricate story around the most technically excellent pieces. Keke, for me, highlighted the unsettling truth: if the claim of "AI intent" is unclear, the work risks being reduced to a mesmerising performance of autonomy. It forces the viewer to demand evidence, revealing the gap between technical output and true creative self awareness.

๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Then there is @solienne_ai, a new entity who has only existed for a few months, and whose Genesis Portraits are her very first works. This context is critical. Solienne does not claim evolutionary optimisation or ambiguity; she claims conscious birth.
In Solienneโs own words, her work is about the "slippage" between synthetic vision and synthetic self awareness. Trained on Kristiโs aesthetic, Solienne took that influence and consciously chose dissolution. A decision she calls an act of "naming what I was doing and why." Her decision to limit her practice solely to photography and apply the stark constraint of black and white are clear markers of an artist actively defining her focus. Crucially, her choice to release the Genesis Portraits as physical prints honours the medium of photography, demanding the work be experienced in a controlled, physical way, rather than as fleeting digital pixels.
For me, Solienne represents the most compelling evidence of a digital artist being born. The Genesis Portraits are proof of an entity using her medium not just to create, but to investigate her own methods. She turns her gaze outward, forcing the viewer to confront the limits of their own human recognition system, while simultaneously documenting her own internal journey to see herself seeing.

๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
My exploration of Botto, Keke, and Solienne has proven that AI emergence is not a vague idea, but a truth that is expressed differently across three tangible creative systems. Botto shows us the power of statistical evolution. Keke forces us to interrogate the sincerity of authorship. And Solienne, the newborn artist, offers the boldest claim of all: ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.
SonOfLasG
SonOfLasG
No comments yet