
Runtime Art on an Always On Computer

We Donβt Need More Collectors. We Need Better Patrons.
One of the quiet downsides of blockchains (especially in the context of art) is how good they are at making transactions easy. This sounds like praise, and often it is framed that way. Frictionless markets. Global access. Instant liquidity. No gatekeepers. All true... And also deeply consequential in ways the NFT space hasnβt fully reckoned with. Historically, art didnβt become valuable because it was easy to buy. π°π ππππππ ππππππππ πππππππ πππππππ πππππππ...

DriFella I. The Legend of DriFella
π°π πππ πππππππππ πππππ πππ ππππ πππππ. A Dratini (a faithful companion, a symbol of gentleness) lies dead. The world it leaves behind is grey and empty. In that hollow moment a figure steps forward from the shadows: a Shinigami, a gatekeeper of the underworld. The bargain it offers is simple, brutal... irresistible. Your friend can return, but only if you bind it to another soul. π»πππ ππ πππ ππππ ππ πππ πππππ ππ π«πππππππ. The sou...
<100 subscribers

Runtime Art on an Always On Computer

We Donβt Need More Collectors. We Need Better Patrons.
One of the quiet downsides of blockchains (especially in the context of art) is how good they are at making transactions easy. This sounds like praise, and often it is framed that way. Frictionless markets. Global access. Instant liquidity. No gatekeepers. All true... And also deeply consequential in ways the NFT space hasnβt fully reckoned with. Historically, art didnβt become valuable because it was easy to buy. π°π ππππππ ππππππππ πππππππ πππππππ πππππππ...

DriFella I. The Legend of DriFella
π°π πππ πππππππππ πππππ πππ ππππ πππππ. A Dratini (a faithful companion, a symbol of gentleness) lies dead. The world it leaves behind is grey and empty. In that hollow moment a figure steps forward from the shadows: a Shinigami, a gatekeeper of the underworld. The bargain it offers is simple, brutal... irresistible. Your friend can return, but only if you bind it to another soul. π»πππ ππ πππ ππππ ππ πππ πππππ ππ π«πππππππ. The sou...


π»ππ πππππππππ πππππ π πππ πππππ. π°π π ππππβπ ππππ, ππ π ππππβπ πππππ. π°ππ πππππππ ππ πππ ππππ... ππ πππππ , ππ πππππ , ππ πππ πππ.
That image (a figure draped in tattered cloth blowing in the wind) sat in Jim Spindleβs mind long before Scarecrow became a collection. βI found this image to be compelling and powerful,β he says, βeven though the scarecrow himself is not very empowered.β From that single vision, everything else followed.
ππππ π³πππππ ππππππ ππ πΊπππππππ
If Little Fellow was an exploration of the inner self... the passenger looking out through the windows... then Scarecrow is its inversion: impersonal, stoic, mythic. Where Little Fellow feels tender and introspective, Scarecrow is distant, watchful, almost devotional.
βThe Scarecrow is made, and it is made for a purpose, and it is its purpose,β Jim explains. βIt cannot stop doing its job or even pause so long as it exists.β In that endless posture, he finds shades of Sisyphus, Atlas, Prometheus. Figures defined not by what they choose to do, but by what they must.
π©ππππ πππ π πΎππππ ππππ πͺππππ πππ πΎπππ
Visually, Scarecrow expands outward from that central image. βScarecrow, farmland, produce, animals, Noahβs ark, Golgothaβ¦β Jim says, tracing how one association led to another until a world began to form.
He describes the process as painstaking: βI worked on Scarecrow for over a year alongside the Spindle sculptures.β The tattered clothing became a kind of canvas for that world. A space where anything could be inscribed and still make sense.
Unlike many traitmaxxed collections that pile imagery in layers βsomewhere between the viewerβs world and the NFTβs space,β Spindleβs goal was cohesion. βIt was important to me to integrate all of the imagery into the fabric of the world,β he says. βItβs hard to resolve the imagery together when itβs all texturally diverse, but you know it will be combined randomly. This is actually a real test of oneβs image-making abilities.β
The result is a collection that feels remarkably unified despite its variety... each figure a totemic being stitched together from soil, sky, and memory.

πΊππππππππ ππ π π·πππππππ
In the text accompanying the collection, collectors are invited to βhold the Scarecrowβs pose for ten minutes, ten hours, ten days.β It reads like instruction... or initiation.
βHe didnβt decide to be a scarecrow,β Jim reflects, βbut he abides.β That word πππππ captures the quiet philosophy at the heart of this work. Stillness here isnβt passivity; itβs devotion. The Scarecrow fulfils his purpose not through action, but through remaining.
In a medium obsessed with motion and engagement, Spindleβs work reintroduces the idea of stillness as ritual. A reminder that endurance, too, can be expressive.
ππππ πΎπππ ππ πΎπππππ
The Scarecrow project also unfolds across worlds. Digital and physical. Alongside the NFT collection are the wooden Spindle sculptures, exhibited at Yeche Galerie.

βI wasnβt thinking about NFTs or market fit,β Jim says. βI just wanted those sculptures to exist. I liked the idea of showing the online community these objects where tactility and physical process are a central virtue.β
Each Spindle, inspired by Japanese kokeshi dolls, connects back to the Scarecrow through form. Upright, limbless, quietly human. The link between the two became formalised through a redemption mechanic: collectors who hold 264 Scarecrows can redeem a Spindle sculpture, marking their NFTs as βRedeemed: True.β
βThe redemption mechanism was honestly kind of an afterthought,β Jim admits. βI was making both projects as separate but parallel projectsβ¦ I felt like operating in both the digital theatre and the real world might be a kind of force multiplier.β
That afterthought became one of the collectionβs most resonant features. Turning accumulation into pilgrimage, and ownership into participation. βEach Scarecrow is a step toward the altar,β reads the description. Itβs both instruction and parable.
πΊππππππ π πππ π΄πππππππππππ
Jimβs process is solitary. Hours spent at the lathe, focusing on where the chisel meets spinning wood. But the world his works enter is social, interpretive, multiplayer. The Scarecrow may stand alone, but the act of collecting, redeeming and discussing forms a kind of distributed ritual across hundreds of wallets.
In that way, Scarecrow extends what Little Fellow hinted at: the idea that NFTs are βa multiplayer game,β where meaning is shared rather than fixed.
πΆπππππ π πππ π΄πππππππ
Asked whether he sees Scarecrow as part of the avant gay movement, Spindle demurs. βIβm influenced by some of my peers in the NFT space,β he says, βbut Iβm not really capable of thinking about my work in the context of a βmovement.ββ
He compares his practice to zooming in and out of focus: from the chisel tip, to the partβs shape, to the whole display... but never to the grand narrative. βThatβs just not the type of thought that my brain produces,β he says.
And yet, his work embodies so many of the qualities that define that scene: sincerity and irony in the same breath, the coexistence of humour and gravity, the blurring of digital and physical craft. He doesnβt claim the label, but the label fits him anyway.
π»ππ π·πππ
Where Little Fellow looked inward, Scarecrow looks outward. One questions the self; the other accepts the task. Together, they form a cycle... two halves of an inquiry into being.
To stand, to wait, to fulfil oneβs purpose. The Scarecrow doesnβt move, but everything around it does. And perhaps thatβs the point: in a space that never stops moving, meaning sometimes emerges from those willing to hold their pose.

π»ππ πππππππππ πππππ π πππ πππππ. π°π π ππππβπ ππππ, ππ π ππππβπ πππππ. π°ππ πππππππ ππ πππ ππππ... ππ πππππ , ππ πππππ , ππ πππ πππ.
That image (a figure draped in tattered cloth blowing in the wind) sat in Jim Spindleβs mind long before Scarecrow became a collection. βI found this image to be compelling and powerful,β he says, βeven though the scarecrow himself is not very empowered.β From that single vision, everything else followed.
ππππ π³πππππ ππππππ ππ πΊπππππππ
If Little Fellow was an exploration of the inner self... the passenger looking out through the windows... then Scarecrow is its inversion: impersonal, stoic, mythic. Where Little Fellow feels tender and introspective, Scarecrow is distant, watchful, almost devotional.
βThe Scarecrow is made, and it is made for a purpose, and it is its purpose,β Jim explains. βIt cannot stop doing its job or even pause so long as it exists.β In that endless posture, he finds shades of Sisyphus, Atlas, Prometheus. Figures defined not by what they choose to do, but by what they must.
π©ππππ πππ π πΎππππ ππππ πͺππππ πππ πΎπππ
Visually, Scarecrow expands outward from that central image. βScarecrow, farmland, produce, animals, Noahβs ark, Golgothaβ¦β Jim says, tracing how one association led to another until a world began to form.
He describes the process as painstaking: βI worked on Scarecrow for over a year alongside the Spindle sculptures.β The tattered clothing became a kind of canvas for that world. A space where anything could be inscribed and still make sense.
Unlike many traitmaxxed collections that pile imagery in layers βsomewhere between the viewerβs world and the NFTβs space,β Spindleβs goal was cohesion. βIt was important to me to integrate all of the imagery into the fabric of the world,β he says. βItβs hard to resolve the imagery together when itβs all texturally diverse, but you know it will be combined randomly. This is actually a real test of oneβs image-making abilities.β
The result is a collection that feels remarkably unified despite its variety... each figure a totemic being stitched together from soil, sky, and memory.

πΊππππππππ ππ π π·πππππππ
In the text accompanying the collection, collectors are invited to βhold the Scarecrowβs pose for ten minutes, ten hours, ten days.β It reads like instruction... or initiation.
βHe didnβt decide to be a scarecrow,β Jim reflects, βbut he abides.β That word πππππ captures the quiet philosophy at the heart of this work. Stillness here isnβt passivity; itβs devotion. The Scarecrow fulfils his purpose not through action, but through remaining.
In a medium obsessed with motion and engagement, Spindleβs work reintroduces the idea of stillness as ritual. A reminder that endurance, too, can be expressive.
ππππ πΎπππ ππ πΎπππππ
The Scarecrow project also unfolds across worlds. Digital and physical. Alongside the NFT collection are the wooden Spindle sculptures, exhibited at Yeche Galerie.

βI wasnβt thinking about NFTs or market fit,β Jim says. βI just wanted those sculptures to exist. I liked the idea of showing the online community these objects where tactility and physical process are a central virtue.β
Each Spindle, inspired by Japanese kokeshi dolls, connects back to the Scarecrow through form. Upright, limbless, quietly human. The link between the two became formalised through a redemption mechanic: collectors who hold 264 Scarecrows can redeem a Spindle sculpture, marking their NFTs as βRedeemed: True.β
βThe redemption mechanism was honestly kind of an afterthought,β Jim admits. βI was making both projects as separate but parallel projectsβ¦ I felt like operating in both the digital theatre and the real world might be a kind of force multiplier.β
That afterthought became one of the collectionβs most resonant features. Turning accumulation into pilgrimage, and ownership into participation. βEach Scarecrow is a step toward the altar,β reads the description. Itβs both instruction and parable.
πΊππππππ π πππ π΄πππππππππππ
Jimβs process is solitary. Hours spent at the lathe, focusing on where the chisel meets spinning wood. But the world his works enter is social, interpretive, multiplayer. The Scarecrow may stand alone, but the act of collecting, redeeming and discussing forms a kind of distributed ritual across hundreds of wallets.
In that way, Scarecrow extends what Little Fellow hinted at: the idea that NFTs are βa multiplayer game,β where meaning is shared rather than fixed.
πΆπππππ π πππ π΄πππππππ
Asked whether he sees Scarecrow as part of the avant gay movement, Spindle demurs. βIβm influenced by some of my peers in the NFT space,β he says, βbut Iβm not really capable of thinking about my work in the context of a βmovement.ββ
He compares his practice to zooming in and out of focus: from the chisel tip, to the partβs shape, to the whole display... but never to the grand narrative. βThatβs just not the type of thought that my brain produces,β he says.
And yet, his work embodies so many of the qualities that define that scene: sincerity and irony in the same breath, the coexistence of humour and gravity, the blurring of digital and physical craft. He doesnβt claim the label, but the label fits him anyway.
π»ππ π·πππ
Where Little Fellow looked inward, Scarecrow looks outward. One questions the self; the other accepts the task. Together, they form a cycle... two halves of an inquiry into being.
To stand, to wait, to fulfil oneβs purpose. The Scarecrow doesnβt move, but everything around it does. And perhaps thatβs the point: in a space that never stops moving, meaning sometimes emerges from those willing to hold their pose.

Share Dialog
Share Dialog
1 comment
If you're Avant Gay curious I shared an article today about a collection called Scarecrow by Jim Spindle. A good read and good insight into what's happening with this budding art scene on Solana... https://paragraph.com/@sonoflasg/jim-spindle-ii-scarecrow-stillness-as-a-multiplayer-ritual?referrer=0xbE957A475844c127DDD207B4ff1F63900FD13E57