Football is about achieving a simple objective: winning games (and by extension, trophies). You can further divide that objective into two sub-objectives: scoring goals and not conceding goals. That's how you win games after all, by scoring more goals than you concede.
At this point, footballing philosophies and tactics splinter and diverge in a thousand different directions. Some managers prefer to play with the ball, some prefer to play without the ball. Some managers favour a back 3, others a back 4, others a back 5. Some managers like to play with 1 striker, others with 2 strikers, and so on. But regardless of the system, every manager is trying to set up his or her team in the best possible way to achieve the objectives outlined above.
Oliver Glasner sets up his team very well.
Crystal Palace typically set up in a very sensible 3-4-3, which plays to the strengths of all the players in their starting 11. This is how I know a manager is really good: instead of dying on the sword of a particular formation or style, they look at the 11 players they have and try to figure out how to put them in the best system to bring out the best in them collectively.
Against Nottingham Forest, they lined up like this.
The idea is quite simple: Richards, Lacroix and Guehi are reasonably capable defenders who can defend space and win duels both aerially and on the ground; together, they make a solid back 3.
Wharton and Kamada are all-action central midfielders; they are both capable of receiving the ball under pressure and either progressing it or circulating it by passing to teammates in space. They are also capable of covering space, tackling, winning duels and making recovery runs to protect the defensive unit behind them. Adam Wharton, in particular, can play a mean pass and split the Nottingham Forest block open more than once in this game with one of those threaded through balls.
Tyrick Mitchell and Daniel Munoz make for some really pleasant viewing if you are a fan of wingbacks, as I am. Any system that deploys wingbacks typically needs them to be able to do two things at a very high level: get forward offensively to support attacks, and get back defensively to cover the space left by your offensive forays when the team is defending. Too often, I see fullbacks who offer great defensive cover but little offensive threat, leading to lopsided teams and subpar attacks (Mazraoui at United is a good example).
Mitchell and Munoz have the energy to get forward and go backwards when they need to throughout the game. But, more importantly, they are effective at going forward. Munoz, in particular, was Crystal Palace's most frequent outlet in the first half, typically receiving the ball from one of the defenders, then turning to drive at Forest's defence before putting a cross into the box. As it turns out, deliveries into the box were Palace's preferred route to goal in this game, and Munoz and Mitchell proved themselves more than capable by delivering some excellent crosses into the box. According to data from Opta, Munoz put 8 crosses into the box, more than any other player on the pitch. In fact, Munoz nearly scored from a Mitchell delivery into the box, as you can see in the highlight below.
It is worth noting that Crystal Palace's only goal in the game came as a result of Eze scoring a penalty won by Tyrick Mitchell. Not a bad day's work for the wingback.
On the wings, Palace have Eberechi Eze and Ismailla Sarr. Sarr is a very traditional winger, strong and pacy, and he can take on his man and cross or strike the ball. Eze can do all of that, but we already know that he has a wider range of tools in his locker, particularly in the ball carrying and ball striking department. Very often in this game, Eze and Sarr would end up attacking the box with Mateta as crosses came in from the wingbacks.
But, sometimes the wingbacks would attack the box while the wingers peeled wide to provide width. This is especially the case with Eze and Mitchell on the left. And understandably so, Eze's deliveries are better than Mitchell's, and Mitchell is taller and stronger, so perhaps better suited to attacking the box than Eze. If you take a snapshot of the Palace goal, you can see this in effect. Sarr delivers into the box from the right, Munoz is ahead of him, attacking the box. On the left, Mitchell is already in the box where he receives Sarr's delivery, and Eze is behind him, just arriving in the box from a wider position.
Up top, Palace have, of course, Jean Philippe Mateta. He's strong, he's tall, he can hold up play, and he can shoot. He's basically the kind of striker you want to play with if a big part of your strategy is crossing into the box.
So there you have it, 11 players set up in the best possible way by their managers. Individually, these players are not the best in the world in their respective positions, perhaps. But Oliver Glasner puts them together so well in a system that elevates the group as a whole.
It's worth noting that football can be a game of moments. And so, no matter how good your system is, you really need players who can make something happen out of nothing. Eberechi Eze brings that magical spice for this Palace team. His 88th-minute strike came out of nowhere, and he almost scored with it. A few minutes later, Matz Sels had to make another brilliant save to keep him out.
I reckon that with a few signings, this Palace team will be in the European places mix next season.
this is one of the reasons i don't rate managers like ruben amorim very highly. the need to fit the players you have into a vision in your head, even if it ends up being square pegs in round holes. much more sensible (and better) to play to the strengths of the players you do have. https://paragraph.com/@thefalsenine/tactical-spotlight-oliver-glasner
also why even sign up for the job if you know it’s not gonna be a fit lol
money. prestige. career visibility. lots of opportunities for an ex-man u manager even if they end on a sour note (see: ten hag for example).
He’ll end up getting the sack and tbh it’s Manchester United board again… they rushed him into the job, and didn’t really think about the consequences of it. He has slightly unusual formation (for prem at least) that is the only one he uses, but Manchester United have never had the players to play it. They went into the transfer market buying the wrong people, at the wrong prices. They still don’t have an actual RWB for me. Dumfries was €25 and one of the worlds best RWB, would have been a no brainier for me. So many serie A strikers flop in premier league, zirkzee & rasmus were exciting but massive gambles. They could have just spent that money on the likes of Cunha etc, Guirassy had a release clause, there was lots of better options. De ligt hasn’t performed for many seasons, did they do the research, because Bayern fans knew he wasn’t good enough. I wonder how up to date their transfer/statistical analysis was at the time.
oh yeah, all the blame of the last few years really lies at the feet of the board. and just when i thought maybe things would change they went and sacked dan ashworth. i think things won't change until the people at the top change.
From what I’ve seen of your new owner, I’m actually quite impressed. But the people and facilities have stagnated over the last decade and will take a few years to sort.
Amorim will get it right but the pressure on a club like United is just too much, if he was in Palace, no one would care about criticizing his 343 because it's palace.
picking a system that suits the players you have has nothing to do with pressure really. mazraoui shouldn't be a wingback, pressure or no pressure.
fair enough, he doesn't get it right w substitutions too
Exactly A manager forcing a rigid system often stifles talent square pegs in round holes rarely shine. The smarter approach? Adapt the strategy to the players’ strengths and let them play naturally. Results + chemistry almost always follow.
precisely.
Yea fam
slowly becoming my favourite midtable manager, sorry marco silva. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNNdXtRNC60/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
I knew I wasn't the only one thinking about what Oliver Glasner has achieved with palace. They beat my team on Sunday but can see brilliant coaching and passion to play for the coach all over the pitch. It will be a surprise if bigger teams aren't moving close to him in the coming days
i wrote a tactical spotlight on him last season for /thefalsenine his tactical simplicity is really refreshing in a world of ever convoluted tactical ideas. https://paragraph.com/@thefalsenine/tactical-spotlight-oliver-glasner
We've just launched a new @thefalsenine section. Tactical Spotlight will provide bite sized tactical overviews of players, coaches, and team setups, typically focusing on one player, team, coach, or game at a time. For our first tactical spotlight, we look at how Oliver Glasner set up his Crystal Palace team in the game against Nottingham Forest yesterday night. https://paragraph.com/@thefalsenine/tactical-spotlight-oliver-glasner?referrer=0x0a61E9065219A1B84A9fa1B67482C485C39c51De
5000 $degen
in a new section for @thefalsenine i look at oliver glasner's team setup against nottingham forest yesterday. crystal palace have a special manager on their hands, and they might end up being what we expected brighton to be all this while. https://paragraph.com/@thefalsenine/tactical-spotlight-oliver-glasner
i am having trouble finding something i published on paragraph. cc: @reidtandy https://paragraph.com/@thefalsenine/tactical-spotlight-oliver-glasner
@chukwukaosakwe this is now fixed. For some reason the post was showing as 'archived'. Did you happen to archive it? I'm unsure how the post got into this state.
i did not. i just hit publish and then i couldn't find it. thanks for the fix!
Sorry about that, looking into it & hope to have it working shortly!