"Don’t let people live rent-free in your head."
If there’s a single headline for 2025’s internet, it’s this: audiences—not platform gatekeepers—finally control whose stories win. It took a decade for Kevin Kelly’s 1,000 True Fans to come true, but now that the rails have shifted, creator independence is not a fantasy. It is possible today.
In July 2025, everything shifted in public: Gary Vaynerchuk, Jesse Pollak, and the entire “A New Day One” stage at Base’s live event made it clear—distribution, payments, and audience are programmable. Platform lock-in is a business model, not a law of nature.
We have been taught to believe: If you’re good enough, the platforms will reward you. The reality? The platforms only reward you until you threaten their margin. YouTubers built media empires—until demonetization, algorithm pivots, and changes to Partner Program “safe zones” swept the rug out. SoundCloud musicians? Monetization came long after the audience escaped to Spotify. Sorry Fred.
Fans, not platforms, are the new kingmakers. You can take your creative energy where it’s respected, compensated, and compounding—when the distribution is portable, the payments are instant, and the rules are coded, not hidden. I think this is the biggest economic shift for creators since YouTube itself.
How often have you clicked “Accept Terms” and wondered what you just gave away? (Hint: almost everything). Doc Searls coined the term “contracts of adhesion”: one-sided, non-negotiable, take-it-or-leave-it agreements you can’t edit or challenge. Every major platform does it. Why? Because by default, a creator must click away rights to forever use, monetize, train on, and copy-paste your content and data—even after you deactivate your account.
Want a flavor?
Instagram’s terms change let your photos train its new AI models (full story, Scientific American).
YouTube can “monetize” content and keep revenue, even from creators not in the Partner Program.
Almost every social giant reserves the right to change the terms unilaterally.
Contracts of adhesion are designed for the platform’s future, not yours. What Web3 offers—through programmable rights, onchain enforcement, and user-defined permissions—is a way to slice out only the rights and access you are truly willing to give, per-project, per-customer, per-month. It’s the difference between owning a keycard to your house… and letting a locksmith sell unlimited copies to your ex, your neighbor, and the local paper.
We’ve been living on digital plantations. For years, the more you create, the more the platforms earn—even as your share shrinks. This is the algorithmic sharecropping era. You do the labor of community-building, content-sculpting, and audience-wrangling—but the land, the market, and the bank are all owned by Facebook, Google, or ByteDance.
Here’s the kicker: as you produce more valuable crops (content), the platforms quietly change the rules of who can buy, what price to expect, and what part of your field is “algorithmically accessible.” Google’s “Helpful Content” update or Facebook’s “pivot to video”? All code for “resetting the rules in our favor.”
This works because platforms hold distribution hostage. They bank on you needing their network; in return, you get payouts only if you meet their latest thresholds—which, like YouTube’s Partner Program, often move just as you’re starting to win.
Web3 shifts this: distribution can be portable, open, and programmable. You can own your list, your following, your subscription logic. The new “land owners” are creators who set the boundaries of their own audience, payments, and promotion.
“Your photo becomes a training sample. Your podcast, a transcript. Your lyrics, the next AI’s style transfer layer.” If you think “free” platforms wouldn’t dream of monetizing your work thrice over…think again. Today, your creative output is the invisible substrate for training artificial intelligence.
First, it generates ad clicks. Second, it trains machine learning models—models which monetize, automate, and eventually compete with you (detailed writeup). Third, platforms then sell AI-driven products to brands and consumers, offering new creation at zero marginal cost—without you in the loop.
In this triple extraction, platforms eat all the upside. Web3 “smart contracts” can flip the script, letting you specify: “Train on this? Pay a fee. Use this as AI input? Cite me. Commercialize my voice? Share profits.” Instead of an all-you-can-eat buffet… it’s an a la carte menu, with pricing set by you.
Why do gas stations charge less for cash? Because cards eat a fee—sometimes north of $0.50 on a $10 sale (NerdWallet deep dive). That “cash price” logic hits everything: shops, restaurants, SaaS sales, international business. Until 2025, digital creators had no way to break out of this—everything defaulted to expensive rails.
Enter stablecoins, Shopify, and Stripe. In June 2025, with stablecoin payments on Shopify × Stripe × USDC, merchants worldwide can accept instant, sub-penny transactions. USDC isn’t just “coin nerds on Discord” anymore—it’s powering discounts on coffee, services, and creator subscriptions. If you’re a creator, every extra percentage point in payment margin can go (a) to you, (b) to your fans, or (c) to the network. With the middlemen shrinking, you can finally tip the scales.
Platforms used to defend high fees as a byproduct of “security, scale, and compliance.” The real reason? Control and habit. In 2025, Stripe—the titan of digital payments—bought Bridge for $1.1B and Privy for wallet UX (Stripe news). The logic: if payment processors don’t own programmable, low-fee rails, someone else will kill them.
Now, Stripe offers merchants the best of both worlds: fiat or USDC, domestic or global, with settlement and wallet control baked into one stack. Volume in stablecoins has surpassed even optimistic projections. What Stripe knows (and legacy gatekeepers fear) is this: it’s better to disrupt yourself than to let creators and fans do it without you.
Kevin Kelly outlined one, but Web3 unlocks at least four:
Distribution Equity: Where you control your audience and how to contact them (see Farcaster’s multi-client user graph).
IP Equity: Where each remix, resale, or creative derivative is traceable and programmable in fees (see Zora).
Token Equity: Where fans don’t just pay, but participate in networks (see Hypersub subscriptions).
Network Equity: Where your true believers own upside, and network effects no longer belong to Silicon Valley’s spreadsheets.
Don’t just read about them—use them. The stack works wherever your fans do.
Ask yourself: Would you let a platform have access to your entire digital life, forever, for one $2.99 deposit? That’s what happens when you click “accept” today.
Self-sovereignty isn’t just about “owning everything you make.” It’s about defining who can do what, where, how long, and for what price. With programmable, selective permissions (explained here), creators can say: You can use my work to display, but not to train your next AI. You can resell this, but royalties stay with me.
Want an exclusive preview? That’s a higher fee, a shorter window, and enforced automatically. No more all-you-can-eat. Every contract is a chef’s choice menu—curated, revocable, and enforceable.
The real “mid-market” secret? Pricing. With portable payments and programmable economics, you can serve $3/month “hobbyists,” $9/month “all-in supporters,” or $18/month “superfans.” The famous Kelly math works when you (a) keep more of every dollar, and (b) stack low-risk yield and token rewards on top (Vitalik’s low-risk DeFi essay). Partial commitments, bonus access, split fees—everything you can encode, you can offer. For the first time, creators have both the margin and the tools to test, price, and perfect their business model as they go.
What changes when you host, rather than attend? Everything.
– Media-led: Build your list, your email, your podcast like Blockworks did—and use it as leverage for every new venture.
– Community-led: Reward your earliest supporters, like Farcaster did, with equity, access, or governance, not just clout.
– Founder-led: Make your brand liquid, responsive, and modular… as a set of tokens, memberships, and experiences anyone can remix (Hypersub).
No more hoping for guest-list inclusion. The real club is the one you build. It's not the Viper Lounge.
Last decade: Experiment in public, get buried by the algorithm. One wrong move and you're out.
Now: Experiment, test, iterate, and never lose your audience or data. Farcaster and open protocols mean identity is portable, revenue streams parallel, and curiosity is rewarded with compounding insight—not existential risk.
Your best product is discovered, not designed in advance. Every experiment is a save point.
Try. Die. Retry. Respawn—better, richer, and closer to a perfect fit.
You don’t need to wait for platforms, media buyers, or curators. The rails exist: payments settle in pennies and seconds; identities are yours, not Google’s; code can enforce your contracts (not just theirs). Shopify and Stripe have already shipped cross-border stablecoins (detail), and platforms like Farcaster and Zora put programmable distribution and rights in your hands.
Start with curiosity, continue with permission, and scale with ownership. The future’s playbooks belong to those who build, not those who rent.
Get ready for the full series and collect this post. You'll thank me later.
Are you ready for your New Day One?
Share Dialog
Zach Harris
Support dialog
A New Day One and Base Camp strengthened my conviction that there’s never been a better time to be a builder, artist or creator onchain. Been thinking a lot about the possibilities crypto can unlock for the attention economy, creator economy, knowledge sharing economy, social economy and self sovereignty game. Have started to explore these in a miniseries where I dive deep into a range of topics. Here is the foreword. They’re all based on the topic of 1000 true fans, but revisited in 2025. https://paragraph.com/@zachharris/1000-fans-revisited?referrer=0x3402AcA642DdB9C322872Dd84a3d4e2F1C17eFF2
@joanwestenberg.eth your beautiful, articulate, and thoughtful post inspired me to begin writing again. Would be curious to hear your hot take, if you'd be open to sharing!
This is a great piece. So many of the same thoughts I’ve been mulling over / struggling with. My biggest problem with the 1,000 true fans theory is the conversion rate. Even a 5% conversion rate from casual consumer to true fan means you need an audience of minimum 20,000 to make that work. And to give you numbers - I have 10,000 email subscribers, 28,000 threads subscribers, 26,000 YouTube subscribers, 25,000 mastodon followers and 20,000 Farcaster followers and so far that’s converted to around 500 “true fans.” The numbers are really tough.
Yes, I think to build that organic flywheel organically, it definitely takes substantial time and effort. Check out Justin Welsh. He developed some hacks for increasing throughput for armies of one. Might be a cool way to think about stacking your revenue and product pricing and fractionalized your time.
True fans also assumes some homogeneity within that set of fans, across niches, etc and that’s rarely the case. Means you struggle with creating products that satisfy a broad range of people and monetize less for yourself or ignore most of your audience in favor of your whales that can pay up for something high ticket Creator economy is still hard
Wow. Thank you for sharing your numbers. I think AI does skew the 1k true fans theory… it’s been somewhat 100xed.
@horsefacts.eth this is that foreword to the mini series icymi
I’m still optimistic about the promise of the internet to free us from middlemen and constraints on sharing data instantly and freely across the globe I always felt that ethereum was going to be one of those rails, and it’s exciting to see all these successful dapps and protocols being being built on top of truly open rails But, Sometimes it makes me think that I’m eternally saying next year is the year of the Linux desktop, 😂
My heart always has space for little red hats 🫡
Mike asked me one time if I wore a fedora Seen
PS. Stay optimistic dood https://tortoise.studio/song/op-op-i-o-u-op
All very salient points. Following along 🫡
@procoin curate FARCAST
This cast has been curated to FARCAST on the Feeds miniapp @zachharris.eth you have been issued FARCAST shares Feed Market Cap: $321.04
Here's a sneak peek into some of the stuff I'm writing about. Would welcome any and all feedback public or private. Wrong answers only. 🫡
Read and subscribed sir Have lots of thoughts on it all, but you’re mostly preaching to the choir. I think web3 can push 1% of creators who do it full time to 10% since there’s less middlemen taking cuts The clearest example of this is patreon in web2. Great work sir. Let me know if you’re looking for specific feedback