Subscribe to Zatodohas
ZatodohasThe expert predicted lawsuits against Twitter after its rebranding to X
The recent announcement of social platform X (formerly Twitter) regarding its rebranding and plans to change its name and logo to "X" has raised concerns about potential legal challenges and trademark infringement issues. Lawyer Josh Gerben has predicted that the company could face lawsuits that may cost up to $100 million in the coming years. Within a few weeks of the rebranding announcement, it is expected that lawsuits related to trademark infringement could be filed against the company, p...
ZatodohasThe IMF questioned the need to ban cryptocurrencies
In a departure from traditional skepticism, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has raised intriguing questions about the necessity of implementing an all-encompassing ban on cryptocurrencies. This shift in perspective showcases the evolving landscape of digital assets and regulatory bodies' willingness to embrace a more nuanced approach. During a recent panel discussion, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva introduced a captivating notion, expressing reservations about the effic...
ZatodohasOKX is interested in the Indian market
Cryptocurrency exchange OKX is actively exploring opportunities to enter the Indian market as part of its expansion strategy. The company's marketing director, Haider Rafik, has mentioned that they currently have 200,000 users of the platform's wallet in India, which represents only 5% of the participants in the local Web3 sector. While OKX does not currently have plans to open an office in India, the exchange is seeking to engage with the local community and explore where they can ...
<100 subscribers
ZatodohasThe expert predicted lawsuits against Twitter after its rebranding to X
The recent announcement of social platform X (formerly Twitter) regarding its rebranding and plans to change its name and logo to "X" has raised concerns about potential legal challenges and trademark infringement issues. Lawyer Josh Gerben has predicted that the company could face lawsuits that may cost up to $100 million in the coming years. Within a few weeks of the rebranding announcement, it is expected that lawsuits related to trademark infringement could be filed against the company, p...
ZatodohasThe IMF questioned the need to ban cryptocurrencies
In a departure from traditional skepticism, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has raised intriguing questions about the necessity of implementing an all-encompassing ban on cryptocurrencies. This shift in perspective showcases the evolving landscape of digital assets and regulatory bodies' willingness to embrace a more nuanced approach. During a recent panel discussion, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva introduced a captivating notion, expressing reservations about the effic...
ZatodohasOKX is interested in the Indian market
Cryptocurrency exchange OKX is actively exploring opportunities to enter the Indian market as part of its expansion strategy. The company's marketing director, Haider Rafik, has mentioned that they currently have 200,000 users of the platform's wallet in India, which represents only 5% of the participants in the local Web3 sector. While OKX does not currently have plans to open an office in India, the exchange is seeking to engage with the local community and explore where they can ...
Subscribe to Zatodohas
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
The tranquil facade of stablecoins may belie an undercurrent of potential instability, or so warns a comprehensive study conducted by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and New York. In a financial landscape increasingly shaped by these digital assets, experts have sounded a clarion call, deeming stablecoins a latent threat to the very stability of the financial system itself.
The study casts a discerning eye on two of the most prominent figures in this arena, USDT and USDC, and dares to draw parallels with the behavior of traditional money market funds. The findings reveal eerie similarities in the actions of stablecoin holders and those of mutual fund investors under the ominous cloud of a bank run scenario. These eerie resemblances and an array of identified vulnerabilities raise the specter of potential instability lurking beneath the seemingly placid surface of stablecoins.
In prophetic tones, the report posits that if these "stable coins" forge deeper connections with the bedrock of key financial markets, their integration could transform them from benign assets to agents of turbulence that have the potential to send shockwaves through the entire financial system. The phrase "too big to fail" takes on a new twist as stablecoins find themselves under scrutiny, as their very presence in the interconnected financial web threatens to destabilize the delicate equilibrium.
The tranquil facade of stablecoins may belie an undercurrent of potential instability, or so warns a comprehensive study conducted by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and New York. In a financial landscape increasingly shaped by these digital assets, experts have sounded a clarion call, deeming stablecoins a latent threat to the very stability of the financial system itself.
The study casts a discerning eye on two of the most prominent figures in this arena, USDT and USDC, and dares to draw parallels with the behavior of traditional money market funds. The findings reveal eerie similarities in the actions of stablecoin holders and those of mutual fund investors under the ominous cloud of a bank run scenario. These eerie resemblances and an array of identified vulnerabilities raise the specter of potential instability lurking beneath the seemingly placid surface of stablecoins.
In prophetic tones, the report posits that if these "stable coins" forge deeper connections with the bedrock of key financial markets, their integration could transform them from benign assets to agents of turbulence that have the potential to send shockwaves through the entire financial system. The phrase "too big to fail" takes on a new twist as stablecoins find themselves under scrutiny, as their very presence in the interconnected financial web threatens to destabilize the delicate equilibrium.
No comments yet