Share Dialog
Farcaster is not just a social media platform - that's just one thing you can do on this protocol.
At its core, Farcaster is a decentralized*, censorship-resistant identity layer.
And because of that it's a platform disruptor!
Instead of Airbnb storing your data and getting 15% of owner/guest fees, Farcaster can be the trustless layer where owner/guest reputation is stored (and done in a way that's much harder to manipulate). The Farcaster-based platform can then provide the same service (connecting owners & guests) but without the middleman fee.
Anyone can then build additional services on this open source platform to help connect owners and guests (or provide additional functionality to either), thus completely transforming the industry and giving power back to its users.
Farcaster can do the same to connect Uber or Lyft driver/riders, Amazon buyers/sellers, Spotify creators/listeners, etc.
Since a key benefit of these centralized platforms is the (reputation) data they store on users, the Farcaster open graph can provide this reputation data and may be more credible and transparent at doing so (it can even provide the data while maintaining user privacy, with the help of zk-proofs).
All these centralized platforms (and many others) can therefore be disrupted and (potentially) built as transparent, open source platforms on top of the Farcaster open graph.
For now Farcaster is mostly focused on trying to disrupt social media. It is not terribly successful at that because it mostly clones the interface elements, and algos of X (all the way down to the verified checkmark design).
Unfortunately, this focus on social media is also undermining Farcaster's growth and adoption.
Instead of expanding our Total Addressable Market we're shrinking it.
Instead of the network surfacing apps, tools and platforms that expand the ecosystem's capabilities, we're forcing contributors to play by the algo rules of engagement-based social media.
This makes about as much sense as making the same contributors play by the algo rules of hosts/guests on Airbnb; "You built something that massively benefits the network? Great. We'll help surface your contribution to the network if you stay at a few more Airbnb homes and get more positive reviews from them."
How is this an effective growth strategy for the network?
Conflating Farcaster 'the protocol' with Farcaster 'the social media platform built on top of the protocol' limits people's perspective on what can be built on Farcaster.
Surfacing user contributions to the network based on engagement disincentivizes builders from developing open source apps and products that benefit the whole network, and drive them to build engagement-based apps and products that extract value from it.
Instead of Farcaster disrupting other platforms, Farcaster is now mostly disrupting its own growth potential.
We need to reverse this trend!
Ask a friend if they’ve ever used RSS: “𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵”. Ask if they’ve listened to a podcast before: “𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦”. Ask a friend if they’ve ever used SMTP: “𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵”. Ask if they’ve sent an email before: “𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦”. Farcaster and TBA will not grow via the protocol. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗳𝗮𝗿 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗼. We’re still figuring this out. And that’s ok.
Maybe the real problem is that protocol needs an acronym?
FSP Farcaster Social Protocol
Highlights the important of a clear name seperate from protocol too Gmail not Gsmtp 🤣
For sure. That’s the problem of whoever builds on top of the protocols.
If they’re 45-59, they’ll know. Cuz they had to. And ftp
Facts
I aggregated all the top crypto (projects) Blogs and Forums via rss. That was an amazing Feed without Noise - until Most of the DeFi projects stopped blogging/updating
and the tech only matters in so far it has a generic popular name that people recognize
yup, and we need to expand what it lets us do. we've been overindexed on the social media component. need to branch out.. https://paragraph.com/@abundance/farcaster-the-platform-disruptor
nobody cares about protocols, they care about the experience
I don't find the content on the Uber App to be interesting.. like, at all but I (and millions of other users) keep coming back to it "More interesting content" may be necessary if you're trying to grow a social media platform, but why should that be the sole focus for the Farcaster Protocol? There are so many use cases for Farcaster (including one day competing with Uber, perhaps). Why only focus on social media?
Very rarely use Uber. Didn't know that they are serving content. How weird.
I mean, they don't have content in the social media sense, but when you go to the app it's not a blank page — it has "content" ..which is not terribly interesting, but that doesn't stop them from being successful
Why would Farcaster be competition for Uber?
Farcaster has the potential to expand its total addressable market (TAM) and disrupt multiple platforms and industries — but are we too busy disrupting (and distracting) ourselves instead? https://paragraph.com/@abundance/farcaster-the-platform-disruptor
Gonna read this one later fasho!
Aren’t mini apps kind of a step towards what you describe here?
in a way yes, though maybe its also step back, because there's less development of more substantial projects, like alt clients
Maybe it’s an idea that will come in due time but we’ve had the decentralized identity primitive for quite a while in crypto and there haven’t been any decentralized uber/airbnb’s yet because the actual execution required is insanely difficult. Seems like the limiting factor is executing on the quality control, dispute resolution, customer experience etc. Though I still am a believer that it’s possible, just incredibly difficult
yea you're right that decentralized identity is not a new primitive. what's new with Farcaster imo is that you have an open graph where users are interacting - so you have rich data that can be used for reputation. Reputation is the component you actually need to make these platforms work of course there are other challenges involved for Uber/Airbnb etc - I just don't think that's what stopping newcomers from succeeding. having to bootstrap a network is the harder problem, and FC solves this
yeah for sure, farcaster seems to be the first real well-executed decentralized id/open social graph where these applications seem more realistic
I like the ideas here, though I'm no expert here and don't understand how to solve. Do you have any proposals? Would rewarding mini app creaters be an example? How about rewarding mini app devs who create the most value by user interaction? And how to make sure not only the mega casino gets rewarded? I'm ignorant, but I like your ambition for this space.
I have a suggestion or two.. it's probably more to start thinking in the direction of rewarding contributions over just engagement and I'm sure we'll be able so iterate and solve the issues as they come https://farcaster.xyz/abundance/0x70329efc
Much agree. The sharing volumes could certainly increase, in almost every available aspect, with monetary invitations. It’s the ‘weeding out’ the ‘invasive species’ in growth sections and the beneficial unanticipated correlations that can become quite interesting. Meaning this in farm/garden, metaphorically.
yes
Valid points in your feature Mike The question remains though … how can we build a system that makes distinction between a simple gesture (like a like, share …) and a more meaningful engagement Had the same issue when was digital magazine publisher in late 90’s. A professional feature costed, involving a journalist, a photographer, a corrector etc… and when bloggers appeared (like influencers today), they reshuffled the whole media industry
by adding Extended Reactions to the protocol :) https://paragraph.com/@abundance/extended-reactions
To embrace will require shooting for higher than just above the towering powerhouses. Will require shooting for higher than the intended aim.