
Five days ago, Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation published a warning: "If AWS, GCP, and Cloudflare went dark, most apps would too."
Today, Cloudflare went dark.
X stopped loading. ChatGPT threw errors. Spotify went silent. McDonald's kiosks displayed "service unavailable." Even DownDetectorโthe site you check when things breakโwas down.
Five days between warning and proof.
This wasn't bad timing. It was validation. And it shows exactly why the Trustless Manifesto mattersโand why good intentions aren't enough to stop centralization.
Here's what happened this morning: Cloudflare, a company that protects websites from attacks and keeps them running during heavy traffic, experienced a "spike in unusual traffic" at 11:20 UTC. Within minutes, roughly 20% of the internet went down.
Nobody forced these companies to depend on Cloudflare. The protocol is openโyou can run your own infrastructure. But Cloudflare made centralization so convenient that it became the default. And defaults become dependencies. Dependencies become single points of failure.
This is how centralization actually works. Not through force or capture, but through making alternatives feel unreasonable.
Think about email. Right now, you could technically run your own mail server. The protocol is still open. But Gmail's spam filters and reputation systems have made self-hosting so painful that most people don't even consider it anymore. They genuinely prefer Gmailโnot because they're forced to, but because it's easier.
Until Gmail goes down. Then everyone wishes they had alternatives.
Crypto is heading down the same path. Ethereum's protocol is permissionless. You can run your own node. But when Infura and Alchemy handle the majority of requests, we've built the same fragility that just took down half the internet.
The Trustless Manifesto lays out three laws to prevent centralization:
No critical secrets
No indispensable intermediaries
No unverifiable outcomes
These are necessary. They prevent the most direct forms of control. But they don't address why people choose centralized systems even when alternatives exist.
Between outages, centralized convenience always wins. Today's Cloudflare failure reminds everyone why decentralization matters. But by tomorrow, that memory will fade. Next week, new developers will default to hosted RPCs because they "just work."
The drift happens in three stages, and the manifesto only addresses the first:
Stage one is about what you can do. Cloudflare doesn't prevent you from running your own infrastructure. The technical options remain open.
Stage two is about what seems reasonable. When everyone uses Cloudflare, running your own infrastructure starts to feel extreme. Paranoid. Why would you do that when this works fine?
Stage three is about what people want. Eventually, the preferences shift. People don't just tolerate centralizationโthey genuinely prefer it. They're not coerced. They choose convenience.
This is where drift becomes permanent. Technical safeguards don't matter if nobody wants to use them.
Solving this requires working on three levels at onceโnot just the technical layer, the manifesto focuses on.
First: Make trustless systems actually usable. The manifesto's three laws are right. But technical openness means nothing if ordinary people can't participate. Make running your own node genuinely accessibleโnot "technically possible if you read documentation for six hours."
Second: Change the culture. Between outages, you need to make decentralization feel normal, not extreme.
Use today's failure. When advocating for trustless infrastructure, say: "Remember November 18th, 2025, when Cloudflare took down 20% of the internet? That's what happens when we depend on a handful of providers."
Track "temporary" centralization that becomes permanent. When a rollup launches with a centralized sequencer and a "decentralization roadmap," watch it publicly. Celebrate when they ship. Call it out when they don't.
Make running your own infrastructure heroic, not paranoid. When someone self-hosts, amplify it.
Third: Make trustlessness profitable. The manifesto says it plainly: "A protocol that relies on unpaid altruism will decay."
Make neutrality the winning economic strategy, not just the virtuous one. Reward people who maintain neutral infrastructure without giving them power to extract rents. Make it more profitable to run trustless systems than to depend on centralized providers.
When sovereignty pays better than convenience, drift becomes reversible.
The manifesto will succeed or fail based on whether it changes what people want, not just what they build.
Success means developers want to build trustless systems, users prefer self-sovereignty, and the market rewards decentralization.
Failure means everyone signs the manifesto, agrees with the principles, then builds centralized systems anyway because "users want UX." We wait for the next outage to remind us why this matters.
Today reminded us. But reminders fade. By next week, most people will go back to trusting Cloudflare because convenience wins every timeโuntil it catastrophically doesn't.
We shouldn't need a crisis to trigger change. That's the whole point of building trustless systems now. So they're ready when we need them, not scrambling to deploy alternatives while everything burns.
I signed the Trustless Manifesto while writing this. Five days between their warning and today's proofโthat's how fast theory becomes reality.
The manifesto names the problem correctly. What I'm adding is why it keeps happening: convenience beats principle until crisis hits, and drift consolidates through shaping what people want, not just controlling what they can do.
Understanding the mechanism matters because it tells us what actually works. Technical safeguards plus cultural change plus economic incentives. Not principles alone.
Trustlessness is expensiveโconstant vigilance, ongoing work, choices that feel wasteful until they save you. But centralized convenience is more expensive. You just pay the price later.
When your government bans your coordination tools.
When your platform decides you violated the terms of service.
When Cloudflare goes down and takes half the ecosystem with it.
The internet paid a small price todayโa few hours of disruption. But it's a reminder that centralized infrastructure always fails eventually. The only question is whether we'll have alternatives ready when crypto's moment comes.
Sign the manifesto. But more importantly, understand why drift happens, and build systems that make trustlessness attractive before we desperately need it.
Because the only sustainable defense is making freedom more attractive than controlโand more accessible than crisis.
The Trustless Manifesto: November 13, 2025
Cloudflare outage: November 18, 2025
Five days between warning and proof.
Jonathan Colton
Play safe dear ๐
The earliest American meme was a chopped-up snake. Eight pieces. One choice. Join, or Die. Ben Franklin published it in 1754 when the colonies were fragmented. The snake made it clear: fragmented = dead, unified = alive. Web3 is living in the same moment. We're building sufficiently decentralized systems on centralized foundations. And calling it revolutionary. We need champions like Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak, who are fighting for the CLARITY Act while building Coinbase, Base, and the Base App. Training wheels aren't the problem. Forgetting they're training wheels is. This isn't about purity. It's about direction. Are we building toward trustlessness, or is Web2.5 the permanent state? Stepping stones or final form? Institutions don't maintain power through force. They retain it through defaults. $join.or.die isn't a coin. It's a choice about trajectory. Franklin's snake worked because you couldn't ignore it. This is the same. A mirror showing which direction we're actually moving. The snake is chopped. The choice is binary. Join, or Die. ๐ $join.or.die 0xe1f4d76ef981eeec6eee2b0eb9749d16acc80b07 Read and sign the https://trustlessness.eth.limo/general/2025/11/11/the-trustless-manifesto.html Read: https://paragraph.com/@jonathancolton.eth/five-days-between-warning-and-proof
joined of course
did you sign it?
โ
Well said, imma gunna need to $join.or.die!!!๐ค ๐ช
Sign the trustless manifesto! And have a great weekend my guy!
Yess and yess bro, hope you have a great weekend too!!!๐โ๏ธ
100 $hunt
๐๐ป
GM
Joined for sure
Itโs so interesting ๐
@jonathancolton, you just received 1,004 claps from ๏ผ black1004 on this content! Want to join the fun? Explore content, swipe right to clap, and earn $HUNT based on your own clapping activity. Your daily clap allowance: 100 ๐ Install the Clap Mini App to get +50 free daily allowance ๐
feels like a real call to choose where weโre headed, not just coast on convenience.
What do you mean, die?
America's oldest meme predates the Declaration of Independence. It was a picture of a chopped-up snake. Eight pieces. One message. Binary choice. Join, or Die. Ben Franklin published it in 1754 because the colonies were acting like isolated entities when they faced a common threat. Each colony operated in its own interest while the French coordinated against them all. The colonies couldn't see that their fragmentation was the vulnerability. The snake made the coordination problem visible. Not through argument. Through a simple visual fact: fragmented = dead. Unified = alive. CC: @nounishprof
I do believe we are at this crossroads in Web3. In case you hadn't noticed, @vitalik.eth and team published the Trustless Manifesto. I enthusiastically signed along with thousands of others. You can find it here. https://trustlessness.eth.limo/general/2025/11/11/the-trustless-manifesto.html The Central Thesis The manifesto argues that Trustlessness is the foundation; everything else is constructed on top of it. Critique of "Convenience Drift": The primary threat to Web3 is not external attack or regulatory capture, but a gradual, internal "drift toward dependence on trust." This drift happens as builders take seemingly harmless shortcuts for convenience (e.g., hosted nodes, centralized sequencers, custodial wallets), which collectively compromise the system's decentralization. The core quote is: "Decentralization erodes not through capture, but through convenience." Trustlessness Defined: A system is truly trustless when its correctness and fairness depend solely on mathematics and consensus, not on the goodwill of any intermediary. An honest participant must be able to "join, verify, and act without permission and without fear."
Six days ago, Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation published a warning: "If AWS, GCP, and Cloudflare went dark, most apps would too." Yesterday, Cloudflare went dark. Reinforcing the manifesto's purpose. I had a few things to say about it. https://paragraph.com/@jonathancolton.eth/five-days-between-warning-and-proof
All of this had me thinking that our current state of Web3 citizenry has parallels with the American Revolution. An event that transformed politics globally. Self-governance was a growing idea. England at the time had a Monarch, A house of Lords, and the House of Commons. They had elected officials. But representative democracy was a new experiment.
If you're still reading you must be a nerd and I appreciate you. Here's something for the effort. https://zora.co/coin/base:0x1a0e0739ba2ab91c27747c364058a406e04c1f04?referrer=0x27c14f455c0988f7bc403cb6de209ffe26695366
the main takeaway from today ๐คซ
good for the bags too tbh, higher
as long as your bags got bigger!
๐
As long as Web 2.0 has infrastructure leadership, it won't get any better than this!
still early ๐
Many such cases my dude
bullish ๐
https://paragraph.com/@jonathancolton.eth/five-days-between-warning-and-proof
๐๐
do you know how much pressure couldfare has everyday? blockchain not even have 0.001% right now.
What's up, x is down too